Skip to main content

Some nodulin and Nod proteins show similarity to specific animal proteins

  • Chapter
Nitrogen Fixation

Abstract

During the development of a legume root nodule several genes encoding nodule-specific plant proteins (nodulins) are specifically activated (18). The nodulins can be divided into early and late nodulins. Early nodulins are primarily involved in development and progression of the infection (30,35), while the late nodulins are involved in nodule function. The functions of some of the late nodulins like leghemoglobin (1), uricase (4,24), nodule-specific glutamine synthase (3,7) and sucrose synthase (21,33) are known. However the function of the majority of the nodulins are at present unknown. The bacterial symbiotic partner encodes several proteins (Nod proteins) that are important for the formation of a functional nodule and for host specificity, but the biochemical functions of the Nod proteins are not known. Leghemoglobin is related to animal globins, and soybean uricase shows similarity to animal uricases (14,22). An indication of the function of some of the nodulin and Nod proteins can be found by searching the databases for similar proteins. In this paper we demonstrate similarity between nodulin 26 and several specific proteins. In addition we report a surprising similarity between the Rhizobium NodC protein and the Xenopus DG42 protein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Appleby, C.A. 1984 Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35:443–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, M.E. & Saier, M.H. 1990 Cell 60:185–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett, M J., Lightfoot, D.A. & Culiimore, J.V. 1989 Plant Mol. Biol. 12:553–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergmann H., Preddie E. & Verma DP.S. 1983 EMBO Jour. 2:2333–2339

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bok, D., Dockstader, J. & Horwitz, J. 1982 J. Cell Biol. 92:213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deveraux, J., Haeberli, P. & Smithies, O.1984 Nucl. Acids Res. 12:387–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Forde, B.G., Day, H.M., Turton, J.F., Wenjun, S., Culiimore, J.V. & Oliver, J.E. 1989 The Plant Cell 1:391–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fortin, M.G, Morrison, N.A. & Verma, D.P.S. 1987 Nucl. Acids Res. 15:813–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gooden, M., Rintoul, D., Takehana, M. & Takemoto, L. 1985 Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 128:993–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gorin, M.B., Yancey, S.B., Cline, J., Revel, J.P. & Horwitz, J. 1984 Cell 39:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gruijters, W.T.M. 1989 Jour. Cell Sci. 93:509–513

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heller, K.B., Lin, E.C.C. & Wilson, H. 1980 Jour. Bact. 144:274–278

    Google Scholar 

  13. Horwitz, J. & Bok, D. 1987 Biochemistry 26:8092–8098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ito, M., Suzuki, M. & Yasuyuki, T. 1988 Eur. J. Biochem. 173:459–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. John, M., Schmidt, J., Wieneke, U., Kriissmann, H.-D. & Schell, J. 1988 EMBO Jour. 7:583–588

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson, K.R., Lampe, P.D., Hur, K.C., Louis, C.F. & Johnson, R.G. 1986 Jour. Cell Biol. 102:1334–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kyte, J. & Doolittle, R.J. 1982 Jour. Mol. Biol. 157:105–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Legocki, R.P. & Verma, D.P.S. 1980 Cell 20:153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lerouge, P., Roche, P., Faucher, C., Maillet, F., Truchet, G., Promé, J.C. & Denarie, J. Nature 344:781–784

    Google Scholar 

  20. Menko, A. S. & Boettiger, D. 1988 Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:1414–1420

    Google Scholar 

  21. Morell, M. & Copeland, L. 1985 Plant Phys. 78:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Motojima, K., Kanaya, S. & Goto, S. 1988 Jour. Biol. Chem. 263:16677–16681

    Google Scholar 

  23. Muramatsu, S. & Mizuno, T. 1989 Nucl. Acids Res. 17:4378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nguyen, T., Zelechowska, M., Foster, V., Bergmann, H. & Verma, D.P.S. 1985 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:5040–5044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rao, Y., Jan, L.Y. & Jan, Y.N. 1990 Nature 345:163–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosa, F., Sargent, T.D., Rebbert, M., Michaels, M.L., Jamrich, M., Grunz, H., Jonas, E., Winkler, J.A. & Dawid, I.B. 1988 Dev. Biol. 129:114–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rossen, L., Johnston, A.W.B. & Downie, J.A. 1984 Nucl. Acids Res. 12:9497–9508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sandal, N.N. & Marcker, K.A. 1988 Nucl. Acids Res. 16:9347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sas, D.F., Sas, M.J., Johnson, K.R., Menko, A. S. & Johnson, R.G. 1985 Jour. Cell Biol. 100:216–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Scheres, B., Horvath, B., Van de Wiel, C., Zalensky, A., Horvath, B., Spaink, H., Van Eck, H., Zwartkruis, F., Wolters, A.-M., Gloudemans, T., Van Kammen, A. & Bisseling, T. 1990 Cell 60:281–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith, C.P. & Chater, K.F. 1988 J. Mol. Biol. 204:569–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Swenson, K.I., Jordan, J.R., Beyer, E.C. & Paul, D.L. 1989 Cell 57:145–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Thummler, F. & Verma, D.P.S. 1987 Jour. Biol. Chem. 262:14730–14736

    Google Scholar 

  34. Török, I., Kondorosi, E., Sicpkowski, T., Pósfai, J. & Kondorosi, A. 1984 Nucl. Acids Res. 12:9509–9524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Van de Wiel, C., Scheres, B., Franssen, H., Van Lierop, M.-J., Van Lammeren, A., Van Kammen, A. & Bisseling, T. 1990 EMBO Jour. 9:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yamamoto, Y.T., Acedo, G.N. & Conkling, M.A. 1989 Jour. Cell. Biochem. Suppl. 13D:313

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yancey, S.B., Koh, K., Chung, J. & Revel, J.P. 1988 Jour. Cell Biol. 106:105–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zampighi, G.A., Hall, J.E., Ehring, G.R. & Simon, S.A. 1989 Jour. Cell Biol. 108:2255–2275

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Peter M. Gresshoff L. Evans Roth Gary Stacey William E. Newton

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Routledge, Chapman & Hall, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sandal, N.N., Marcker, K.A. (1990). Some nodulin and Nod proteins show similarity to specific animal proteins. In: Gresshoff, P.M., Roth, L.E., Stacey, G., Newton, W.E. (eds) Nitrogen Fixation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6432-0_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6432-0_58

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-6434-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-6432-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics