Skip to main content

Biofeedback and Differential Conditioning of Response Patterns in the Skeletal Motor System

  • Chapter
Biofeedback and Behavior

Part of the book series: NATO Conference Series ((HF,volume 2))

Abstract

While biofeedback techniques are being extensively applied in operantly conditioning an impressive variety of central and autonomic nervous system responses, our ignorance of the neural mechanisms underlying operant learning remains virtually complete. Indeed, we still have the most elementary and speculative conception of how the nervous system initiates a simple voluntary motor response, no less how the occurrence of such a response can be modified by reinforcement. Our understanding of neural mechanisms underlying operant responding will probably advance soonest in the skeletal motor system, for several reasons. A basic understanding of the neural pathways converging onto spinal motoneurons has emerged from a century of anatomical and electrophysiological studies. More recently developed experimental techniques now make it possible to study activity of identified neurons in awake animals trained to perform relevant motor responses. In such experiments, biofeedback techniques could prove particularly useful in investigating functional relations between elements of the skeletal motor system. We will first review some relevant facts concerning the functional organization of the final elements in the skeletal motor system and then consider past and potential applications of biofeedback techniques to investigate this system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basmajian, J. V. Muscles alive. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. T., Ruch, T. C., & Ward, A. A., Jr. Topographical representation of muscles in motor cortex of monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1947, 10, 39–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evarts, E. V. Representation of movements and muscles by pyramidal tract neurons of the precentral motor cortex. In M. D. Yahr & D. P. Purpura (Eds.), Neurophysiological basis of normal and abnormal motor control. Hewlett, New York: Raven Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evarts, E. V. Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1968, 31, 1427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetz, E. E. Operant conditioning of cortical unit activity. Science, 1969, 163, 955–957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fetz, E. E. Operant control of single unit activity and correlated motor responses. In M. Chase (Ed.), Operant control of brain activity. Los Angeles: UCLA Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetz, E. E., Cheney, P. D., & German, D. C. Corticomotoneuronal connections of precentral cells detected by post-spike averages of EMG activity in behaving monkeys. Brain Research, 1976, 114, 505–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fetz, E. E., & Baker, M. A. Operantly conditioned patterns of precentral unit activity and correlated responses in adjacent cells and contralateral muscles. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1973, 36, 179–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fetz, E. E., & Finnochio, D. V. Operant conditioning of specific patterns of neural and muscular activity. Science, 1971, 174, 431–435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fetz, E. E., & Finocchio, D. V. Correlations between activity of motor cortex cells and arm muscles during operantly conditioned response patterns. Experimental Brain Research, 1975, 23, 217–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetz, E. E., & Wyler, A. R. Operantly conditioned firing patterns of epileptic neurons in motor cortex of chronic monkey. Experimental Neurology, 1973, 40, 586–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanerz, J. Discharge properties of motor units in relation to recruitment order in voluntary contraction. Acta Physiol. Scand., 1974, 91, 374–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, V. F., & Mortensen, O. A. Identification and voluntary control of single motor unit activity in the tibialis anterior muscle. Anatomical Record, 1962, 144, 109–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henneman, E., Shahani, B. T., & Young, R. R. The extent of voluntary control of human motor units. In M. Shahani (Ed.), The motor system: Neurophysiology and muscle mechanisms. New York: Elsevier, 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henneman, E., Somjen, G., & Carpenter, D. O. Functional significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1965, 28, 599–620.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, D. R., Schmidt, D. M., & Thompson, W. D. Predicting measures of motor performance from multiple cortical spike trains. Science, 1970, 170, 758–762.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuypers, H. G. J. M. Central cortical connections to the motor and somatosensory cell groups. An experimental study in the rhesus monkey. Brain, 1960, 83, 161–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luschei, E. S., Garthwaite, C. R., & Armstrong, M. E. Relationship of firing patterns of units in face area of monkey precentral cortex to conditioned jaw movements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1971, 34, 552–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendell, L. M., & Henneman, E. Terminals of single Ia. fibers: Location, density and distribution within a pool of 300 homonymous motoneurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1971, 34, 171–187.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olds, J. Operant conditioning of single unit responses. Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress of Physiological Science, 1965, 372–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C. G., & Porter, R. The pyramidal projection to motoneurons of some muscle groups of the baboon’s forelimb. Progress in Brain Research, 1964, 12, 222–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R. Early facilitation at corticomotoneuronal synapses. Journal of Physiology, London, 1970, 207, 733–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R., & Hore, J. Time course of minimal corticomotoneuronal excitatory postsynaptic potentials in lumbar motoneurones of the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1969, 32, 443–451.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, J. B., & Whitlock, D. G. Intracellular potentials recorded from motoneurons following precentral gyrus stimulation in primates. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1961, 24, 91–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fetz, E.E. (1977). Biofeedback and Differential Conditioning of Response Patterns in the Skeletal Motor System. In: Beatty, J., Legewie, H. (eds) Biofeedback and Behavior. NATO Conference Series, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2526-0_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2526-0_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2528-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2526-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics