Abstract
Elms represent a valuable and diverse woody plant resource for traditional forest products as well as urban landscape use. Yet despite their obvious importance to urban and rural populations, we know relatively little about the extent and patterning of genetic variation in elms. Efficient utilization of genetic variation in future breeding programs, as well as integration of biotechnology with conventional plant improvement practices, requires a more complete and systematic assessment of genetic variation. Recent advances in molecular biology, especially the development of new sets of genetic markers (e.g. RFLP, RAPD, isozymes), hold great promise for enhancing our understanding of systematic affinities and the evolution of elms, as well as permitting the construction of detailed genetic maps for use in breeding and other forms of genome manipulation. Our evidence from chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA restriction site analysis reveals that elms are rich in molecular variation, having a large number of mutations amenable to restriction site analysis. Examples of the utility of such data to clarify taxonomic problems are provided, as well as suggestions for future applications of molecular markers in breeding programs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burnham, R. 1986. Foliar morphological analysis of the Ulmoideae (Ulmaceae) from the early Tertiary of western North America. Palaeontographica Abt. B. 201:135–167.
Clegg, M., and G. Zurawski. 1992. Chloroplast DNA and the study of plant phylogeny: present status and future prospects. Pages 1–13 in: Molecular Systematics of Plants. P. Soltis, D. Soltis, and J. Doyle, eds. Chapman and Hall, New York.
Dudley, J., M. Saghai Maroof, and G. Rufener. 1992. Molecular marker information and selection of parents in corn breeding programs. Crop Sci. 32:301–304.
Fu, L. K. 1980. [A study of the genus Ulmus in China.] Journ. of North-eastern Forestry Inst. (Beijing). No. 3 (Sept.):26. [In Chinese].
Gianassi, D. 1978. Generic relationships in the Ulmaceae based on flavonoid chemistry. Taxon 27(4):331–342.
Grudzinskaya, I. 1974. [On taxonomic position and area of the section Chaetoptelea, genus Ulmus.] Bot. Zhurn. (Leningrad) 59:61–66. [In Russian].
Guries, R., and E. B. Smalley. 1986. Elms for today and tomorrow. Pages 214–218 in: Proc. 3rd Nat. Urban For. Conf. A. Philips and D. Gangloff, comps. Orlando, Florida.
Hamby, R., and E. Zimmer. 1992. Ribosomal RNA as a phylogenetic tool in plant systematics. Pages 50–91 in: Molecular Systematics of Plants. P. Soltis, D. Soltis, and J. Doyle, eds. Chapman and Hall, New York.
Hardin, J. 1975. Hybridization and introgression in Quercus alba. J. Arnold Arbor. 56:336–363.
Helentjaris, T., M. Slocum, S. Wright, A. Schaefer, and J. Nienhuis. 1986. Construction of genetic linkage maps in maize and tomato using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Theor. Appl. Genet. 72:761–769.
Heybroek, H. 1976. [Classification and nomenclature in the genus Ulmus.] Groen 32(8):237–240 (In Dutch with English summary.]
Heybroek, H. 1983. Resistant elms for Europe. Pages 108–113 in: Research on Dutch Elm disease in Europe. D. A. Burdekin, ed. Forestry Comm. Bull. #60, London.
Lander, E., and D. Botstein. 1989. Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121:185–199.
Michelmore, R., I. Paran, and R. Kesseli. 1991. Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: A rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 88:9828–9832.
O’Malley, D.1992. Personal communication.
Palmer, J., R. Jansen, H. Michaels, M. Chase, and J. Manhart. 1988. Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast DNA variation. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 75: 1180–1218.
Paterson, A., E. Lander, J. Hewitt, S. Peterson, S. Lincoln, and S. Tanksley. 1988. Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature 335:721–726.
Richens, R. 1983. Elm. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Rieseberg, L., and S. Brunsfeld. 1992. Molecular evidence and plant introgression. Pages 151–176 in: Molecular Systematics of Plants. P. Soltis, D. Soltis, and J. Doyle. Chapman and Hall, New York.
Schneider, C. 1916. [Guide to knowledge of the genus Ulmus. I. Division of the genus and survey of the species] Oster. Bot. Zeitschr. 66:21–34. [In German].
Sherman, S., and D. Gianassi. 1988. Foliar flavonoids of Ulmus in eastern North America. Biochem. System. Ecol. 16:51–56.
Smith, R. and K. Sytsma. 1990. Evolution of Populus nigra (section Aigeiros): Interspecific hybridization and the chloroplast contribution of Populus alba (section Populus). Amer. J. Bot. 77:1176–1187.
Soltis, D., P. Soltis, and B. Milligan. 1992. Intraspecific chloroplast DNA variation: systematic and phylogenetic implications. Pages 117–150 in: Molecular Systematics of Plants. P. Soltis, D. Soltis, and J. Doyle, eds. Chapman and Hall, New York.
Song, K., J. Suzuki, M. Slocum, P. Williams, and T. Osborn. 1991. A linkage map of Brassica rapa (syn. campestris) based on restriction fragment length polymorphism loci. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82:296–304.
Sticklen, M., M. Bolyard, R. Hajela, and L. Duchesne. 1991. Molecular and cellular aspects of Dutch elm disease. Phytoprotect.72:1–13.
Stuber, C., M. Edwards, and J. Wendel. 1987. Molecular marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize. II Factors influencing yield and its component traits. Crop. Sci. 27:639–648.
Swofford, D. 1991. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. vers. 3.0r. Illinois Nat. Hist. Surv., Champaign, IL.
Tanksley, S., N. Young, A. Paterson, and M. Bonierbale. 1989. RFLP mapping in plant science; New tools for an old science. Bio/Technology 7:257–264.
Townsend, A. M, L. Schreiber, W. Masters, and S. Bentz. 1991. “Frontier” elm. Hortsci. 26:80–81.
Wiegrefe, S. J. 1992. Molecular Genetic Variation in the Ulmaceae: Phylogenetic Implications. Ph. D. Dissertation, Univ. Wisconsin-Madison., 166 pp.
Wang, X.-R., A. Szmidt, A. Lewandowski, and Z.-R. Wang. 1990. Evolutionary analysis of Pinus densata Masters, a putative Tertiary hybrid. I. Allozyme variation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:635–640.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wiegrefe, S.J., Guries, R.P., Smalley, E.B., Sytsma, K.J. (1993). Genetic Diversity in Elms: What Molecular Data Tell Us. In: Sticklen, M.B., Sherald, J.L. (eds) Dutch Elm Disease Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6872-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6872-8_19
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-6874-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6872-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive