Skip to main content

GSM Cellular Phones Interference with Implantable Ventricular Defibrillators

  • Chapter
Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine

Abstract

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are automatic arrhythmia management devices designed to detect ventricular tachycardia (VT), fast ventricular tachycardia (FVT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and, upon detection, deliver the programmed pacing cardioversion or defibrillation therapies. In addition these devices provide bradycardia pacing therapy. An ICD constantly monitors the cardiac rhythm for adequate short-term therapy delivery by means of one lead in the right ventricle and, only in dual chamber ICDs, another lead in the right atrium. When an event occurs, the ICD measures its amplitude. The sensitivity is automatically adjusted on the basis of the measured amplitude until a new event is sensed at the end of the absolute refractory period. Heart rhythm detection is usually based on the classification of R-R intervals into three classes: slow rhythm (SR), ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. The ICD makes this classification by measuring the R-R interval and comparing it to programmable boundaries: VT and VF cycle length. Ventricular tachycardia detection occurs when the corresponding R-R interval is longer than the VF cycle length and shorter than or equal to the VT cycle length, and the cumulative number of VT detections are equal to a programmed parameter (NVT). Ventricular fibrillation detection occurs when the corresponding R-R interval is shorter than or equal to the VF cycle length and the cumulative number of VF detections are equal to a programmed parameter (NVF). Sinus rhythm detection occurs when the corresponding R-R interval is longer than the VT and VF cycle lengths. The treatment to apply in case of an SR detection or VF detection is unambiguous. However, a VT detection can indeed be: sinus tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia (atrial fibrillation, flutter or atrial tachycardia) or ventricular tachycardia. In order to distinguish between them, single chamber ICDs adopt dedicated algorithms. If tachycardia is detected ICD delivers pulse burst or ramp for antitachycardia stimulation or cardioversion therapy via the combined pacing/sensing/shock electrode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schmitt C., Bracmann J., Waldecker B.et al, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator: possible hazards of electromagnetic interference. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 14: 6, 982–4 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Seifert T., Block M., Breithardt G., Erroneous discharge of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator caused by an electric razor Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 18: 8, 1592–4 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Madrid A., Sànchez A., Bosch E.et al., Dysfunction of implantable defibrillators caused by slot machine. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 20: 1 Pt2, 212–214 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McIvor M.E., Environmental electromagnetic interference from electronic article surveillance devices: interaction with an ICD. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 18: 2229–2230 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fetter J.G., Rpee, Benditt D.G. et al., Electromagnetic interference from welding and motors on implantable cardioverter defibrillator as tested in the electrically hostile work site. JACC. 28: 2, 423–427 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Man K. C., Davidson R., Langberg J.J. et al., Interferences from a hand held radio frequency remote control causing discharge of an implantable defibrillator. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 16: 1756–1758 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hayes D.L., Carrillo R.G., Findlay G.F., Embrey M., State of the science: pacemaker and defibrillator interference from wireless communication devices. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 19: 1419–30 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bassen H. I., Moore H. J., Ruggera P. S., Cellular phone interference testing of implantable defibrillators, in-vitro. Circulation. 92, 8: 738 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bostrom U., Interference from mobile telephone a challenge for clinical engineers. Clinical Engineering Update. 10: 1–2 (1991).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barbaro V., Bartolini P., Donato A. et al. Electromagnetic interference of analog cellular telephones with pacemaker. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 19: 1410–1418 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barbaro, V. et al. (1999). GSM Cellular Phones Interference with Implantable Ventricular Defibrillators. In: Bersani, F. (eds) Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4867-6_177

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4867-6_177

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7208-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4867-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics