Skip to main content

Complexity versus Complex Systems: A New Approach to Scientific Discovery

  • Chapter
Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery

Abstract

Extraction of quantitative features from observations via measuring devices M means that the words of science are coded as numbers, and the syntaxis is a set of mathematical rules, thus all consequences should be worked in a purely deductive way. This characteristic of science displays two orders of drawbacks, namely, undecidability of deductive procedures, and intractability of complex situations. The way out of such a crisis consists in a frequent readjustment of M suggested by the observed events. This adaptive strategy differs from the adaptivity of a learning machine, which — inputted by a data stream — readjusts itself over a class of theoretical explanations in order to select the optimal choice. On the contrary, the scientist not only modifies the explanations for a fixed data set, but also explores different data sets by modifying M, that is, by selecting a different point of view. This M-adjustment is a pre-linguistic operation, not expressible by a formal language. Hence, the scientific endeavor can not be reduced to a machine task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abarbanel, H.D.J., Brown, R., Sidorowich, J.J., and Tsinuing, L.S., 1993, The analysis of observed chaotic data in physical systems, Rev. Mod. Phys 65:1331–1365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P.W., 1972, More is different, Science 177:393–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arecchi, F.T., Basti, G.F., Boccaletti, S., and Perrone, A., 1994, Adaptive recognition of a chaotic dynamics, Europhys. Lett. 26:327–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arecchi, F.T., and Farini, A., 1996, Lexicon of Complexity, Studio Editoriale Fiorentino, Firenze.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arecchi, F.T., and Boccaletti, S., 1997, Adaptive strategies for recognition, noise filtering, control, synchronization and targeting of chaos, Chaos 7:621–634.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Atmanspacher, H., 1994, Complexity and meaning as a bridge across the Cartesian cut, J. of Consciousness Studies 1:168–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badii, R., and Politi, A., 1997, Complexity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C.H., 1987, Dissipation, information, computational complexity and the definition of organization, in Emerging Syntheses in Science, D. Pines, ed., Addison Wesley, Redwood City, Ca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boccaletti, S., and Arecchi, F.T., 1995, Adaptive control of chaos, Europhys. Lett. 31:127–131.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chaitin, G.J., 1966, On the length of programs for computing binary sequences, J. Assoc. Comp. Math. 13:547–560.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Crutchfield, J.P., 1992, Semantics and thermodynamics, in Nonlinear Modeling and Fore-casting, M. Casdagli and S. Eubank, eds., Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutchfield, J.P., and Young, K., 1989, Inferring statistical complexity, Phys Rev. Leu. 63:105–108.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • D’ Alessandro, G., and Politi, A., 1990, Hierarchical approach to complexity with applications to dynamic systems, Phys Rev. Lett. 64:1609–1612.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, G., 1932, Letter to M. Weiser “On the sun spots”, 1 December 1612, Italian original in: Opere di G. Galilei, Firenze, Vol. V, pp. 187–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann, M., 1994, The Quark and the Jaguar, Freeman, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grassberger, P., 1986, Toward a quantitative theory of self-generated complexity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 25:907–919.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grassberger, P., Schreiber, T., and Schaffrath, C., 1991, Nonlinear time sequences analysis, Int. J. Bif. Chaos 1:521–534.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hoperoft, J.E., and Ullman, J.D., 1979, Introduction to Automata Theory,Languages and Computation, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogorov, A.N., 1965, Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information, Problems of Information Trasmission 1:4–20.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, W., Köppers, G., and Nowotny, H., 1990, Selforganization, Portrait of a Scientific Revolution, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S., 1931, Collected Papers, 1–6, C. Harshome and P. Weiss, eds, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA; 7–8, A.W. Burks, ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M., 1958, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R., 1981, Strange attractors, chaotic behavior, and information flow, Z Naturforsch, 36a:80–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H., 1982, The architecture of complexity, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106:467–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Franz, M.L., 1988, Psyche und Materie, Einsiedeln, CH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A., 1987, Fuzzy Sets and Applications (selected papers), J. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arecchi, F.T. (1999). Complexity versus Complex Systems: A New Approach to Scientific Discovery. In: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J., Thagard, P. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7181-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4813-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics