Skip to main content

Introduction: The Debate on Design Review

  • Chapter
Design Review

Abstract

Design review is a procedure, like zoning, used by cities and towns to control the aesthetics and design of development projects. Although it is a new phenomena, its adoption by local jurisdictions is growing at a rate that compares to the rapid adoption of zoning in the 1930s. I have recently completed a national survey of planning agencies in more than 370 cities and towns on the topic of their design review processes; 83 percent of the towns surveyed had some form of design review. My initial assumption—that aesthetic review was primarily restricted to historic districts and structures—proved to be wrong. Only twelve respondents reserved design review exclusively for historic structures or districts. Therefore, we can conclude that more than 85 percent of the cities and towns in this country have moved into the arena of design review of ordinary, nonhistoric development projects. This widespread use of design review is also new: 60 percent of the respondents with design review have introduced it in the last twelve years, 10 percent in the last two years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Costonis, John. 1982. “Law and Aesthetic Regulation: A Critique and a Reformation of the Dilemma.” Michigan Law Review 80:355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costonis, John. 1989. Icons and Aliens: Law, Aesthetics and Environmental Change. Champaign: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Doug. 1992. “Guiding Light or Backseat Driver” AIA Memo, December, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, Samuel, III. 1987. “Architectural Appearance Review Regulations and the First Amendment: The Good, the Bad and the Consensus Ugly.” Urban Lawyer 19 (Winter): 287–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Francis. 1992. “Battery Park City: An American Dream of Urbanism.” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Design Review, p. 315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, David. 1992. “Design Performance.” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Design Review, p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Stephen. 1977. “Subjectivity, Expression, and Privacy: Problems of Aesthetic Regulation.” Minnesota Law Review 62 (November): 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Brenda Case Scheer Wolfgang F. E. Preiser

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scheer, B.C. (1994). Introduction: The Debate on Design Review. In: Scheer, B.C., Preiser, W.F.E. (eds) Design Review. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2658-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2658-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-99161-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2658-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics