Abstract
Design review is a procedure, like zoning, used by cities and towns to control the aesthetics and design of development projects. Although it is a new phenomena, its adoption by local jurisdictions is growing at a rate that compares to the rapid adoption of zoning in the 1930s. I have recently completed a national survey of planning agencies in more than 370 cities and towns on the topic of their design review processes; 83 percent of the towns surveyed had some form of design review. My initial assumption—that aesthetic review was primarily restricted to historic districts and structures—proved to be wrong. Only twelve respondents reserved design review exclusively for historic structures or districts. Therefore, we can conclude that more than 85 percent of the cities and towns in this country have moved into the arena of design review of ordinary, nonhistoric development projects. This widespread use of design review is also new: 60 percent of the respondents with design review have introduced it in the last twelve years, 10 percent in the last two years.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Costonis, John. 1982. “Law and Aesthetic Regulation: A Critique and a Reformation of the Dilemma.” Michigan Law Review 80:355.
Costonis, John. 1989. Icons and Aliens: Law, Aesthetics and Environmental Change. Champaign: University of Illinois.
Gordon, Doug. 1992. “Guiding Light or Backseat Driver” AIA Memo, December, p. 28.
Poole, Samuel, III. 1987. “Architectural Appearance Review Regulations and the First Amendment: The Good, the Bad and the Consensus Ugly.” Urban Lawyer 19 (Winter): 287–344.
Russell, Francis. 1992. “Battery Park City: An American Dream of Urbanism.” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Design Review, p. 315.
Scheer, David. 1992. “Design Performance.” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Design Review, p. 133.
Williams, Stephen. 1977. “Subjectivity, Expression, and Privacy: Problems of Aesthetic Regulation.” Minnesota Law Review 62 (November): 1–58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scheer, B.C. (1994). Introduction: The Debate on Design Review. In: Scheer, B.C., Preiser, W.F.E. (eds) Design Review. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2658-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2658-2_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-412-99161-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2658-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive