Abstract
Modern packaging has given the public what it was demanding, quicker shopping, less frequent shopping, more choice, lower prices, better hygiene; modern supermarkets could not function without the sophistication of packaging today. This has led to the ‘throw away’ society where the majority of packaging has become one trip and then thrown away. However, there is now a change taking place, governments in both developed and developing countries are introducing legislation which requires used packaging to be collected and reused or recycled. A growing concern about the amount of household waste being generated in the United States in the 1980s led to a vigorous spread of mandatory recycling laws covering producers and users of all packaged goods. The waste disposal problem and shortage of landfill sites for disposal of rubbish was highlighted when the mayor of New York arranged for a load of the city’s garbage to be taken to the Caribbean and back. Whilst New York has a shortage of landfill sites, this is not generally the case elsewhere in the United States. In Europe, there are problems in the Netherlands and countries where the geology is unsuitable, but again many countries have more than adequate suitable landfill sites and so could continue present methods of disposal. Used packaging is perceived as one of the principal constituents of waste mainly because of its high profile. People are very aware of the high level of used packaging in their garbage bins but in reality, used packaging only represents approximately 1–1.5% of the total tonnage of waste produced in Europe each year. Used packaging accounts for a quarter by weight of household waste and a similar amount by volume of landfilled waste. Even if all packaging were removed, there would still be a waste problem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aluminium Association (1990) Aluminium Recycling. Aluminium Association, Washington DC, p. 6.
Anon (1988) Dutch bottle bank 10 years old. Voedingsmiddelentechnologie 21(13), 11.
Anon (1989a) Farewell to Swiss glass recycling. Verpackung (Zurich) 44(5), 22–25.
Anon (1989b) Increased in recycled glass. Brauwelt 129(16), 631.
Anon (1992a) The Can Makers, Update No. 8, p. 8.
Anon (1992b) The Can Makers, Update No. 8, p. 1.
Anon (1993) Packaging Week 18 February.
Cooper, J. (1992) Packaging and the Environment, Pira International, p. 54.
Cornaz, J.D. (1989) The practical repercussions of the beverage regulation for glass.Verpackung (Zurich) 44(5), 20–22.
EC (1990) EC Directive No. 90/128/EEC Plastics in contact with foodstuffs.
EC (1992) Proposal for a Council Directive on Packaging and Packaging Waste 92/C263/01.Off. J. Eur. Commun. 12 October.
Ichiko, T. (1988) Recycling of glass bottles. JPI 26(12), 12–22.
PCOMI (1992) Plastics in municipal incineration, W. Freiesleben, European Centre for Plastics in the Environment, Brussels.
Price, B. (1990) Hazardous Waste Management, Financial Times Management Report.
Ogilvie, S.M. (1992) Glass cullet recycling offers opportunities for significant energy savings of up to 25% and reduced emissions as a result of fuel savings compared with manufacture from virgin materials. A Review on the Environmental Impact of Recycling. DTI, Warren Spring.
US Government Advisory Association (1989) Resource Recovery Yearbook. Government Advisory Association, New York.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
White, R. (1994). Disposal Of Used Packaging. In: Dalzell, J.M. (eds) Food Industry and the Environment. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2097-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2097-9_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5872-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2097-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive