Skip to main content

The Effects of Remanent Magnetization on Magnetic Flux Leakage Signals

  • Chapter
Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation

Abstract

The Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL)Technique is the most commonly used technique to inspect large diameter transmission pipelines [1–5]. A typical MFL inspection system uses permanent magnets to apply an axially oriented magnetic field to the ferromagnetic pipe material. The magnetic field is perturbed by a metal-loss region (usually caused by corrosion) to produce flux leakage outside the pipe, which can be measured by field sensors. The magnetization system in an MFL inspection system should ideally produce a magnetic field that is

  • strong enough to cause a measurable amount of magnetic flux to leak from the pipe material at metal-loss regions,

  • uniform from inside to the outside surface of the wall thickness so that the measured signal is more linearly related to metal-loss depth, and

  • consistent in magnitude along the length of a pipe so that flux leakage measurements can be compared at different locations during an inspection run.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. A. Bubenik and J. B. Nestleroth, “Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) Technology for Natural Gas Pipeline Inspection,” GRI Report 91/0367, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Bal, “The Latest Developments in Magnetic Flux Pigs,” Pipes & Pipelines International. September-October 1991, pp 24-26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. L. Atherton, “Magnetic Inspection is Key to Ensuring Safe Pipelines,” Oil and Gas Journal. August 7, 1989, pp 52-61.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. W. E. Shannon and L. Jackson, “Flux Leakage Testing Applied to Operational Pipelines,” Materials Evaluation. Vol. 46, No. 12, November 1988, pp 1516–1524.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Teitsma, P. Porter, H. A. French and D. L. Atherton, “Recent Developments in Corrosion Detection,” Proc. Int. Conference on Pipeline Inspection, June 1983, pp 445-471.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.J. Eiber, et. al., “GRI Nondestructive Evaluation Program: Pipeline Simulation Facility Development”, Gas Research Institute Annual Report, GRI-92/0141, December 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nestleroth, J.B., Davis, R.J. (1995). The Effects of Remanent Magnetization on Magnetic Flux Leakage Signals. In: Thompson, D.O., Chimenti, D.E. (eds) Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1987-4_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1987-4_58

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5819-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1987-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics