Skip to main content

Abstract

Pest management using pesticides has been an usual way to control insect pests by farmers all around the world in the past several years. This is primarily because pesticides gave quick and obvious results. Nobody bothered whether a chemical treatment is absolutely necessary or not. Soon the harmful effects of pesticides began to show. Chronic and cumulative poisoning began to appear. Secondary pest out-breaks and pest resurgence became common phenomena. Thus it has become imperative to all concerned to seek alternate methods of pest management. Parasitic Hymenoptera are good alternatives for chemical pest control. They form an important component in biological control programmes of several insect pests. Among the natural enemies used in biological control of insect pests, the parasitic Hymenoptera has been the most successful (Clausen, 1978; Noyes,1985). According to Greathead (1986) out of 393 species of parasitoids which have been established in classical biological control programmes, 344 (87%) are parasitic Hymenoptera. The parasitic Hymenoptera were responsible for 279 cases of effective biological control, as opposed to 3 cases of Aculeate Hymenoptera and 40 cases of Diptera.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Agricola, U., Agounke, D., Fisher, H.V. and Moore, D. 1989, The control of Rastrococcus invadens Williams (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Togo by the introduction of Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes(Hymenoptera: Encyritidae), Bull. Entomol Res. 79: 671 - 678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucek, Z. 1979, Description of a new eupelmid parasite (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of cockroaches in India, Bull. Entomol. Res. 69: 93 - 96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucek, Z. 1988, Australasian Chalcidoidea, CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucek, Z. and Narendran, T.C. 1981, Indian Chalcid wasps (Hymenoptera) of the genus Dirhinus parasitic on Synanthropic and other Diptera, Syst. Entomol. 6: 229 - 251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chacko, M.J. 1987, Biological Control with exotic as well as indigenous natural enemies, J. Coffee Res. 17:109– 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherian, M.C. and Margabandhu, V. 1943, Preliminary trials with Trichogramma parasites for control of Cotton boll worms, Madras Agri. J. 31(4): 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, C.P. 1978, Introduced parasites and predators of arthropod pests and weeds: a review, In:Agricultural Hand Book, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, H. and Easwaramoorthy, S. 1985, Recent advances in biological control of sugarcane pests, In:Advances in Biological Control Research in India, eds. K.J.Joseph and U.C.Abdurahiman, Proceedings of National Seminar on Entomophagous Insects, Calicut, India, pp. 200–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bach, P. 1959, New species and strains of Aphytis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) parasitic on the California red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Mask) in the Orient, Ann. Entomol. Soc. Ame. 52(4): 354–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bach, P. (ed.) 1964, Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bach, P. and Rosen, D. 1991, Biological Control by Natural Enemies, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 255–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggleton, P. and Belshaw, R. 1992, Insect parasitoids; an evolutionary over view, Philo. Trans. Royal Soc.Series B, 337: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greathead, D.J. 1986, Parasitoids in classical biological control, In: Insect Parasitoids, eds. J.K.Waage and D.J. Greathead, Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, V.K. 1988, Parasitic Hymenoptera Research and Education, Adv. Paras. Hymenoptera Res. pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayat, M. and Subba Rao, B.R. 1986, Family Trichogrammatidae, Oriental Insects 20: 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffaker, C.B. and Gutierrez, A.P. 1990, Natural enemies and prey population, In: Armoured Scale Insects:Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, ed. D. Rosen, Volume B., Elsevier, Germany, pp.185 -195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamoorthy, A. and Singh, S.P. 1987, Biological control of citrus mealy bug, Planococcus citri with an introduced parasite Leptomastix dactlylopì in India, Entomophaga 32: 143 -148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunhikannan, K. 1931, The mass rearing of egg parasites of sugarcane moth borer in Mysore (Preliminary experiments), J. Mysore Agric. Exper. 12: 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K.B. and Singh, R.N. 1945, Control of Woolly aphis by Coccinella septem- punctata Linn, Indian Farm 6(1): 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Salle, J. and Gauld, I.D. 1991, Parasitic Hymenoptera and biodiversity crisis, Redia 74 : 315–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Salle, J. 1993, Parasitic Hymenoptera, biological control and biodiversity, In: Hymenoptera and Biodiversity eds. J. La Salle and I.D. Gauld, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 197–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.S. and Chiu, C.H. 1961, Preliminary observation both on ecology and morphology of the egg parasite of top-borer in sugarcane, Rep. Taiwan Sugarcane Exper. Sta. 23: 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K.S. 1988, The Eucoilidae from Taiwan, I, (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea), J. Taiwan Mus. 41(2) : 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani, M.S. 1989, From the Editor, Hexapoda 1(1 & 2) : iii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani, M.S. and Sharma, S.K. 1982, Proctorupoidea (Hymenoptera) from India, A review, Oriental Insects 16: 135–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R.M. and Hassell, M.P. 1988, Population dynamics and biological control, Philoso. Trans. Roy. Soc.London, B 318: 129–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, K.S.S. 1996, A new species of Sympiesis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) parasitic on teak defoliator Hyblaeae puera (Lepidoptera: Hyblaedae), Bull. Entomol Res. 86: 73 - 76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, M.R.G.K. 1986, Insects and mites of crops in India, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narendran, T.C., Anil, K. and Surekha, K. 1992, On some important and beneficial chalcids (Hymenoptera:Chalcidoidea) associated with sericulture industry in India, Bioved 3(1) : 1 - 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narendran, T.C. 1984a, Key to Indian genera of the family Chalcididae (Hym. Chalcidoidea), Entomophaga 29(4): 431–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narendran, T.C. 1984b, Chalcids and Sawflies associated with plant galls, In: Biol. Gall Insects, ed. T.N.Ananthakrishnan, Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narendran, T.C. 1987, Studies on Indian Chalcididae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea), Department of Zoology,University of Calicut publication, Calicut, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narendran, T.C. 1989, Oriental Chalcididae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea), Zoological Monograph,Department of Zoology, University of Calicut publication. Calicut, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narendran, T.C. 1994, Torymidae and Eurytomidae of Indian subcontinent, Zoological Monograph,Department of Zoology, University of Calicut publication, Calicut, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narendran, T.C. 1996, Systematics and its Relevance, In : Second Refresher Course in Zoology (Abs.), eds.D. Ray Chaudhuri and S. Banergee, Department of Zoology, University of Calcutta publication,Calcutta, India, pp. 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narendran, T.C. 1998, Parasitic Hymenoptera, Interline Publishers, Bangalore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narasimham, A.V. and Sankaran, T. 1982, Ecological specificity of a new oothecal parasite Neostylopyga rhombifolia (Stoll), In : Proc. Symposium on Ecology of Animal Populations, Zoological Survey of India, 3: 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuencschwander, P. 1989, Biocontrol of Mango mealybug, IITA Res. Briefs 9: 5 - 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikam, P.K. and Gaikward, A.M. 1989, Role of hyperparasitoids in the biological control of Heliothis armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera : Noctuidae) with special reference to Campoletis chlorideae Uchida(Hymenoptera : Ichneumonidae) in India, J. Entomol. Res. 13 (1): 6 - 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyes, J.S. 1985, Chalcidoids and biological control, Chalcid Forum 5: 5 - 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyes, J.S. and Hayat, M. 1994, Oriental Mealybug Parasitoids of Anagyrini (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae),CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillai, G. B. and Nair, K. R. 1982, Mating behaviour and biology of Elasmus nephantidis Rohwer(Hymenoptera:Elasmidae) a parasitoid of Nephantis serinopa Meyrick, J. Plant. Crops, 10(1) : 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillai, G.B. and Nair, K.R. 1983, Xanthopimpla nana nana Schulz. (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) a new pupal parasitoid of Opisina arenosella walker on coconut, J. Plant. Crops 11(1) : 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran, B. and Gopalan, M. 1997, Pediobius foveolatus Crawford (Eulophidae: Hymenoptera) a potential parasitoid on the grubs of egg plant spotted beetle Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata Fabr. Entomo.22 (2) : 147–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajmohana, K. and Narendran, T.C. 1998, Biodiversity of diapriid wasps (Hymenoptera) of Kerala and their potential as biocontrol agents, In : Proc. Tenth Kerala Science Congress, pp. 137 140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh, P.K. 1987, Observations on crop loss in robusta Coffee due to mealybug and shot-hole borer, J.Coffee Res. 17: 94 -95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V.P. and Nagarkatti, S. 1971, Can sugarcane borers in India be controlled by indigenous parasites? Indian Sugarcane 21: 219 -223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V.P., Ghani, M.A., Sankaran, T. and Mathur, K.C. 1971, A review of biological control of insects and other pests in South East Asia and Pacefic Region, CAB Tech. Commu. No. 6: 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, W.V. and Miller, K.R. 1989, Keeping Options Alive : The Scientific Basis for Conserving by Biodiversity, World Research Institute, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds, F.J. 1967, Biological control of pests of veterinary importance, In : Veterinary Bulletin,Weybridge, 37: 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sithanantham, S. and Solayappan, A.R. (eds.) 1980, Biological Control of Sugarcane Pests in India, The Tamil Nadu Co-operative Sugar Federation Ltd., Madras, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudheendrakumar, V.V. 1986, Studies on the natural enemies of the teak pests Hyblaea puera and Eutectona machaeralis, Research Report of Kerala Forest Research Institute 38: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudheendrakumar, V.V. 1987, Studies on the parasites of Hyblaea puera in teak plantations in Nilambur,In: Advance in Biological Control Research in India, eds. K.J.Joseph and U.C. Abdurahiman, Proc.National Seminar on Entomophagous Insects, Calicut, India, pp. 116–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surekha, K., La Salle, J., Sudheendrakumar, V.V. and Murphy, S. T. 1996, A new species of Sympiesis(Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) parasitic on teak defoliator Hyblaea puera (Lepidoptera: Hyblaeidae) in India, Bull. Entomol. Res. 86: 73–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sureshan, P. M. and Narendran, T. C. 1997, Studies on Sphegigaster Spinola (Hymenoptera : Chalcidoidea:Pteromalidae) from India, Entomon 22: 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swezey, O. H. 1940, A survey of the insect pest of cultivated plants in Guam., Hawaii Planters Records 44(3): 151–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. R. 1955, A catalogue of the parasites and predators of insect pests, 3(3) Hosts of Hymenoptera, pp. 191–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thontadarya, T. S. and Rao, K. J. 1985, Egg parasitoid as one of the components in integrated management of cotton pests, In : Advances in Biological Control Research in India, eds. K. J. Joseph and U. C.Abdurahiman, Proc. National Seminar on Entomophagous Insects, Calicut, India, pp. 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velayudhan, R. 1987, Host selection and parasitic potential of Anastatus ramakrishnae (Mani)(Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae), In: Advances in Biological Control Research in India, eds. K. J. Joseph and U. C. Abdurahiman, Proc. National Seminar on Entomophagous Insects, Calicut, India, pp. 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeranna, G. and Jyothi, H. K. 1994, Life-Table Studies on Pachycrepoideus veerannai Narendran and Anil, a Chalcid (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) parasitoid of Exorista sorbillans Weid (Diptera:Tachinidae), Entomon 19: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Narendran, T.C. (2001). Parasitic Hymenoptera and Biological Control. In: Upadhyay, R.K., Mukerji, K.G., Chamola, B.P. (eds) Biocontrol Potential and its Exploitation in Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1377-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1377-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5523-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1377-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics