Abstract
One of the most basic skills of a proficient language user is the ability to combine smaller units (e.g., words) into larger units (e.g., phrases). Therefore, a mechanism that combines such “syntactic” objects is a good candidate for a basic component of the human computational system. Chomsky (1995) defines a mechanism called Merge that concatenates two and only two syntactic objects (e.g., morphemes, words) in each application. This paper presents evidence from children’s earliest productions that Merge operates on three levels in child grammar. First, Merge operates on the word-level, fusing two words into single lexical items. Merge also operates on the sub-word level providing a straightforward account of the so-called “mixed” productions of bilingual children. In addition, Merge combines words into phrases. The fact that this mechanism only concatenates two units in any single application yields an elegant account of the observed initial period in language development in which only two-word combinations are attested (Bowerman, 1990; Brown, 1973). Language acquisition data thus reveal a simple concatenation operation like Merge to be one of the most basic mechanisms of language production.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bloom, L., Lightbown, P., & Hood, L. (1975). Structure and variation in child language. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 160, 40–42.
Bowerman, M. (1973). Early syntactic development: A crosslinguistic study with special reference to Finnish. London: Cambridge University Press.
Bowerman, M. (1990). Mapping thematic roles onto syntactic functions: Are children helped by innate linking rules? Linguistics, 28, 6, 1253–1289.
Bradley, D. C., Garrett, M., & Zurif, E. B. (1980). Syntactic deficits in Broca’s Aphasia. In D. Caplan (Ed.), Biological Studies of Mental Processes (pp. 269–287). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Braine, M. (1963). The ontogeny of English phrase structure: The first phase. Language, 39, 1–13.
Braine, M. (1976). Children’s first word combinations. With commentary by Melissa Bowerman. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 41, 1–97.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Epstein, S. D., Thráinsson, H., & Zwart, C. J-W. (1996). Introduction. In W. Abraham, S. Epstein, H. Thráinsson, & C. J-W Zwart (Eds.), Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in the minimalist framework (pp. 1–66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Guilfoyle, E., & Noonan, M. (1992). Functional categories and language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 37, 2, 241–272.
Hamburger, H. (1980). A deletion ahead of its time. Cognition, 8, 389–416.
Hoekstra, T., & Jordens, P. (1994). From adjunct to head. In T. Hoekstra, & B. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 119–149). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Keyser, S. J., & Roeper, T. (1992). Re: The abstract clitic hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 89–125.
Köppe, R. (1996). Language differentiation in bilingual children: The development of grammatical and pragmatic competence. Linguistics, 34, 927–954.
Lebeaux, D. (1988). Language acquisition and the form of the grammar. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Miller, W., & Ervin, S. W. (1964). The development of grammar in child language. In U. Bellugi, & R. Brown (Eds.), The acquisition of language (pp. 9–34). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Peters, A. (2001). From prosody to grammar in English: The differentiation of catenatives, modals, and auxiliaries from a single protomorpheme, In J. Weissenborn, & B. Höhle (Eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, lexical, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition. Language acquisition and language disorders (pp. 23) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Powers, S..M. (1998a). Children’s innovative instrument nominals. In E. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the guage research forum (pp. 201–210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Powers, S. M. (1998b). Binarity and singularity in child grammar. In B. Hollebrandse (Ed.), New perspectives on language acquisition. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 22, (pp. 1–14). University of Massachusetts: GLSA.
Powers, S. M. (1996). The growth of the phrase marker: Evidence from subjects. Doctoral Dissertation, Linguistics Department, University of Maryland College Park.
Powers, S. M. (2001). Children’s semi-lexical heads. In N. Corver, & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Semi-lexical categories: The function of content words and the content of function words. Studies in generative grammar 59 (pp. 97–126). Mouton de Gruyter.
Powers, S. M., & Musolino, J. (1997). Precursor relative clauses in the acquisition of English. In A. Sorace, C. Heycock, & R. Shillcock (Eds.), Proceedings of the GALA ’97 conference on language acquisition (pp. 126–131). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax: The nature of early child grammars of English. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Roeper, T. (1996). Merger theory and formal features in acquisition. In H. Clahsen (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition (pp. 415–450). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Roeper, T. (1997). Children’s minimalist representations: Merge and formal features. Paper presented at New Perspectives on Language Acquisition: Minimalism and Pragmatics, Linguistics Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Stern, C., & Stern, W. (1928). Die Kindersprache. Leipzig: Barth.
Tracy, R. (1998). Zwei Sprachen und ein Kopf: Was für noise it makes. Paper presented at the Linguistics Department, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Powers, S.M. (2002). Merge as a Basic Mechanism of Language: Evidence from Language Acquisition. In: Witruk, E., Friederici, A.D., Lachmann, T. (eds) Basic Functions of Language, Reading and Reading Disability. Neuropsychology and Cognition, vol 20. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1011-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1011-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5350-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1011-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive