Skip to main content

Deriving Design Alternatives Based on Quality Factors

  • Chapter
Software Architectures and Component Technology

Abstract

Software is rarely designed for ultimate adaptability or performance but rather it is a compromise of multiple considerations. At almost every stage of the software development lifecycle, software engineers have to cope with various design alternatives. Current object-oriented design practices, however, rely mainly on the intrinsic quality factors of the object-oriented abstractions rather than considering quality factors as explicit design concerns. It is considered important to support software engineers in identifying, comparing and selecting the alternatives using quality factors such as adaptability and performance. This chapter introduces a new technique to depict, compare and select among the design alternatives, based on their adaptability and time performance factors. This technique is formally specified and implemented by a number of tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Akşit, Separation and Composition of Concerns. ACM Computing Surveys 28A(4), December, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Akşit, B. Tekinerdoğan, F. Marcelloni, & L. Bergmans. Deriving Object-Oriented Frameworks from Domain Knowledge. In Building Application Frameworks: Object-Oriented Foundations of Framework Design, Fayad et al. (eds), Wiley, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Arrango. Domain Analysis Methods. In Software Reusability, Schäfer, R. Prieto-Díaz, and M. Matsumoto (Eds.), Ellis Horwood, New York, New York, pp. 17–49, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S.R. Chidamber, & C. F. Kemerer. A Metrics Suite for Object-Oriented Design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 20(6): 476–93, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Date. An Introduction to Database Systems. Addison-Wesley, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. Jacobson et al. Software Reuse. ACM Press, NewYork, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G.Kiczales, J. Lamping, A. Mendhekar, C. Maeda, C. Lopes, J.-M. Loingtier & J. Irwin, Aspect-Oriented Programming. ECOOP ′97 Conference Proceedings, LNCS 1241,, pp. 220–242, Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. M. Law & W. D. Kelton. Simulation Modeling & Analysis. Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C-L. Lee, G. Iyengar & S. Kota. Automated Configuration Design of Hydraulic Systems. In: Artificial Intelligence in Design′92, (Ed) J. S. Gero, pp. 61–82, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K.J. Lieberherr. Adaptive Object-Oriented Software: The Demeter Method with Propagation Patterns. PWS Publishing Company, Boston, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. F. Opdyke. Refactoring Object-Oriented Frameworks. University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W.H. Press, B.P. Flannery, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling. Numerical Recipes. Cambridge University Press 1986, pp. 191–199, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Rumbaugh, M. Blaha, W. Premerlani, F. Eddy, & W. Lorensen. Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice Hall, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Sedgewick. Algorithms. Addison-Wesley, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. U. Smith. Performance Engineering of Software Systems. Addison-Wesley, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Steyaert, C. Lucas, K. Mens, & T. D’Hondt. Reuse Contracts: Managing the Evolution of Reusable Assets. OOPSLA ′96 Proceedings, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, pages 268–285, ACM Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Tekinerdoğan. Synthesis-Based Software Architecture Design. PhD Thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Twente, March 23, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Tekinerdoğan & M. Akşit. Adaptability in object-oriented software development: Workshop report, In M. Muhlhauser (ed), Special issues in Object-Oriented Programming, Dpunkt, Heidelberg, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Tong & D. Sriram. Introduction. In: Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design, Vol. 1, (Eds) C. Tong & D. Sriram, pp. 1–53, Academic Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Akşit, M., Tekinerdoğan, B. (2002). Deriving Design Alternatives Based on Quality Factors. In: Akşit, M. (eds) Software Architectures and Component Technology. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 648. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0883-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0883-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5286-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0883-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics