Skip to main content

The Economic Availability of Woody Biomass Feedstocks in the Northeast

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 710 Accesses

Abstract

The viability of bioenergy projects and policies depends in part on the economic availability (supplies and prices) of biomass feedstocks. The Northeast USA is poised with significant woody biomass resources, largely available from forest lands and urban wood waste. Further, the Northeast has great potential to augment feedstock supplies with short-rotation woody crops. Based on the results from a national agricultural simulation model, by the year 2030, the Northeast USA could potentially provide between 4.3 and 25.5 million dry Mg year−1 at farmgate prices of $22 and $88 dry Mg−1, respectively. These supplies represent between 9 and 14 % of total woody biomass supplies that might be available in the lower 48 states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Forestland is defined as land at least 120 ft wide and 1 ac in size, with at least 10 % cover (or equivalent stocking) by live trees of any size, including land that formerly had such tree cover and that will be naturally or artificially regenerated (Smith et al. 2009). Forestland is further defined as timberland and other forestland. Timberland is defined as forestland that is producing, or is capable of producing, in excess of 20 cubic feet per acre per year of industrial wood and not withdrawn from timber utilization by statute or administrative regulation. Other forestland is defined as forestland other than timberland and productive reserved forestland. It includes available forestland, which is incapable of annually producing 20 cubic feet per acre per year. Reserved forestland is administratively removed from production.

  2. 2.

    Unutilized wood volume from cut, or otherwise killed, growing stock from cultural operations, such as precommercial thinnings or from timberland clearing. Does not include volume removed from inventory through reclassification of timber land to productive reserved forest land (Smith et al. 2009).

  3. 3.

    All prices are at the farmgate. These projections are derived from the base-case scenario.

References

  • Aliston JM, Norton G, Pardey PG (1995) Science under scarcity: principles and practice for agricultural research evaluation and priority setting. Cornell University Press, Ithinca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Torre UD, Ray DE (2000) Biomass and bioenergy applications of the POLYSYS modeling framework. Biomass Bioenerg 18(4):291–308, <Go to ISI>://000086604500005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English B, De la Torre Ugarte D, Hellwinckel C, Jensen K, Menard RJ, West TO, Clark C (2010) Implications of energy and carbon policies for the agriculture and forestry sectors. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Institute of Agriculture, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna M, Chen X, Huang H, Önal H (2011) Supply of cellulosic biofuel feedstocks and regional production pattern. Am J Agric Econ 93(2):7

    Google Scholar 

  • Langholtz M, Graham RC, Eaton L, Perlack R, Hellwinckel C, De la Torre Ugarte D (2012) Price projections of feedstocks for biofuels and biopower in the U.S. Energy Policy, 41, 9. http://authors.elsevier.com/offprints/JEPO5395/7d6eee227fc4c5e6a2e78127a7590e62

  • Lin W, Westcott PC, Skinner R, Sanford S, De la Torre UD (2000) Supply response under the 1996 Farm Act and implications for the U.S. field crops sector. Market and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlack R, Wright L, Turhollow AF, Graham RL, Stokes B, Erback D (2005) Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, pp 1–78, http://feedstockreview.ornl.gov/pdf/billion_ton_vision.pdf#search=’Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billionton annual supply’

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piggot RR (1992) Some old truths revisited. Aust J Agric Econ 26(2):117–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray D, De la Torre UD, Dicks MR, Tiller K (1998) The POLYSYS modeling framework: a documentation. Agricultural Policy Analysis Center, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, www.agpolicy.org/polysys.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith W, Miles P, Perry CH, Pugh S (2009) Forest resources of the United States, 2007, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energy (2009). High-yield scenario workshop series (No. INL/EXT-10-20074). p 125

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energy (2011) U.S. billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, pp 1–227, http://feedstockreview.ornl.gov/pdf/billion_ton_vision.pdf#search=’Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billionton annual supply’

    Google Scholar 

  • USDOE (2012) Biomass multi-year program plan, November 2012. USDOE, Washington, DC, p 187

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker T, Cardellichio P, Colnes A, Gunn J, Kittler B, Perschel B, Recchia C, Saah D (2010). Biomass sustainability and carbon policy study (No. NCI-2010-03). Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts. http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/doer/renewables/biomass/manomet-biomass-report-full-hirez.pdf

  • Wojnar Z (2012) Renewable fuels roadmap and sustainable biomass feedstock supply for New York, vol 2. NYSDERA, Albany, NY, p 24, http://www.nyserda.ny.gov/Publications/Research-and-Development-Technical-Reports/Biomass-Reports/Renewable-Fuels-Roadmap.aspx

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Langholtz Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Langholtz, M., Jacobson, M. (2013). The Economic Availability of Woody Biomass Feedstocks in the Northeast. In: Jacobson, M., Ciolkosz, D. (eds) Wood-Based Energy in the Northern Forests. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9478-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9478-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9477-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9478-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics