Skip to main content

Ethics in Geriatric Trauma

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geriatric Trauma and Critical Care

Abstract

Ethical principles that underlie contemporary surgical care of the elderly are founded on principles of medicine originating with the Hippocratic Oath: non-maleficence, beneficence, autonomy, and justice. Caring for the geriatric trauma patient may be particularly challenging as this is a vulnerable and sometimes frail patient population often with limited decision-making capacity. This chapter explores the ethical principles that form the cornerstones of geriatric trauma care, outlines the consent process and determination of decision-making capacity, and discusses the concept of DNR and medical futility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Percival T. Medical ethics; or a code of institutes and precepts adapted to the professional conduct of physicians and surgeons. 3rd ed. London: John Churchill 1849. p. 27–66.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Medical Association. Code of medical ethics of the American Medical Association council on ethical and judicial affairs. American Medical Association; Chicago 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Doyal L. Surgical ethics. In: Williams NS, Bullstrode CJK, O’Connell PR, editors. Bailey and love’s short practice of surgery. London: Hodder Arnold. 2008. p. 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grossman MD, Miller D, Scaff DW, Arcona S. When is an elder old? Effect of preexisting conditions on mortality in geriatric trauma. J Trauma. 2002;52(2):242–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilmoria KY, Raval MV, Clifford YK, Nathens AB, et al. Comparison of 30-day outcomes after emergency general surgery procedures: potential for targeted improvement. Surgery. 2010;148(2):217–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, Syin D, Bandeen-Roche K, Patel P, et al. Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(6):901–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacobs DG, Plaisier BR, Barie PS, Hammond JS, Holevar MR, Sinclair KE, et al. Triage of geriatric trauma. J Trauma. 2003;54(2):391–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. American Hospital Association. A patient’s bill of rights. Chicago: American Hospital Association; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990, sections 4206 and 4751 of Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1990. Public Law 101–508. 5 Nov 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holmes HM. Quality of life and ethical concerns in the elderly thoracic surgery patient. Thorac Surg Clin. 2009;19(3):401–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Madan AK, Cooper L, Gratzer A, Beech DJ. Ageism in breast cancer surgical options by medical students. Tenn Med. 2006;99(5):37–8, 41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Madan AK, Aliabadi-Wahale S, Beech DJ. Ageism in medical students’ treatment recommendations: the example of breast-conserving procedures. Acad Med. 2001;76(3):282–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Beuchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leclerq WKG, Keulers BJ, Scheltinga MRM, Spauwen PHM, van der Wilt G. A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions. World J Surg. 2010;34:1406–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. National Research Act. Public Law 93–348. 12 July 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murphy T. Ethics in Clerkships; Surrogate Decision Making. University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine. [cited 27 Dec 2012]. Available from: http://www.uic.edu/depts/mcam/ethics/surrogate.htm.

  17. In re Quinlan, 355 A2d 647 (JN), 429 US 922. 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health 497 US 261. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Diem SJ, Lantos JD, Tulsky JA. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on television; miracles and misinformation. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1578–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kasman DL. When is medical treatment futile? J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:1053–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Trotter G. Mediating disputes about medical futility. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1999;8:527–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne C. Mosenthal MD, FACS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kunac, A., Mosenthal, A.C. (2014). Ethics in Geriatric Trauma. In: Yelon, J., Luchette, F. (eds) Geriatric Trauma and Critical Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8501-8_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8501-8_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8500-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8501-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics