Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Oocyte Donation: Legal Aspects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Third-Party Reproduction

  • 873 Accesses

Abstract

In vitro fertilization (IVF) with donor egg is a widely practiced treatment option for various types of infertility issues. Legal protections for donors and the recipients of donor eggs are not uniform across the states, and, in most places, there are no laws that mandate parentage or other rights of the parties. The sperm donor paradigm affords basic structure to the management of egg donation, but significant differences between egg and sperm donation strain the application. Professional association guidelines, established procedures, and contracts among the parties provide strategies for best practice in this area. Scientific advancements, notably egg freezing, offer new potential, but carry with them the added responsibility of increased diligence in informed consent discussions, record keeping, and adherence to guidelines and applicable laws.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    At the time of this writing, states that have statutes are CO LA, ND, OK, OR, TX, UT, VA, WA, WY, CA, NY, and FL.

References

  1. Center for Disease Control [Internet], cited October 27, 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/art/NationalSummaryReport.aspx.

  2. Blakeslee S. Infertile woman has baby through embryo transfer. New York Times. February 4, 1984. http://nytimes.com/1984/02/04/us.

  3. The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law Assisted reproductive technologies: analysis and recommendations for public policy. New York: 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spur D. The baby business: elite eggs, designer genes, and the thriving commerce of conception. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Financial compensation of oocyte donors Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2007Aug [cited 2012 Sept 28]; 305:[about 4pp]. http://www.asrm.org;uploadedFiles/ASRM_Content/News_and_Publications/Ethics_Committee_Reports_and_Statements/financial_incentives/pdf; Informing offspring of their conception by gamete donation. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2004 March [cited 2012 Sept 28]: 22:[about 5 pp]. http://www.asrm.org;uploadedFiles/ASRM_Content/News_and_Publications/Ethics_Committee_Reports_and_Statements/informaing_offspring_donation.pdf; Interests, obligations and rights of the donor in gamete donation. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2009 January [cited 2012 Sept 28]: [about 4 pp]. http://www.asrm.org;uploadedFiles/ASRM_Content/News_and_Publications/Ethics_Committee_Reports_and_Statements/iinterests_obligations__rights_of_donors.pdf; Oocyte donation to post-menopausal women. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2004 Sept [cited 2012 Sept 28]: S254:[about 2 pp]. http://www.asrm.org;uploadedFiles/ASRM_Content/News_and_Publications/Ethics_Committee_Reports_and_Statements/ipostmenon.pdf; Using family members as gamete donors and surrogates. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2012 Oct [cited 2012 Sept 28]: 797:[about 6pp]. http://www.asrm.org;uploadedFiles/ASRM_Content/News_and_Publications/Ethics_Committee_Reports_and_Statements/ifamily_members.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  6. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Repetitive oocyte donation, Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2008 Nov [cited 2012 Sept 27];S194:[about 2pp]. http://www.asrm.org;uploadedFiles/ASRM_Content/News_and_Publications/Practice_Committee_Opinions/Repetitive_oocyte(1)pdf, and Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation, Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2012 Oct [cited 2012 Nov 1]; article in press FNS27810_proof. http://www.asrm.org;uploadedFiles/ASRM_Content/News_and_Publications/Practice_Guidelines/Guidelines_and_Minimum_Standards/2012_Guidelines_for_gamete(1).pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McDonald v. McDonald, 608 N.Y.S.2d 477 (2d Dep’t. 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ezzone v. Ezzone, Lake City Dom. Rels. Ct. (Ohio Oct. 24, 1997); In re C.K.G., No. M2003–01320-COA-R3-JV (Tenn.App. 06/22/2004).

    Google Scholar 

  9. K.M. v. E.G., 117 P.3d 673 (Cal 2005); at 685.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rice v. Flynn, 2005 WL 2140575 (Ohio App., 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Flynn v. Bimber, 70 Pa.D&C.4th 261 (2005); Belsito v. Clark, 67 Ohio Misc.2d 54, 644 N.E.2d 760 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paretta v. Med. Offices for Human Reproduction, 760 N.Y.S.2d 639 (N.Y. Misc. 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robert B. v. Susan B. 109 CalApp.4th 1109, 135 Cal.Rptr.2d 785 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  14. James S. ABC News [Internet]. NY: ABC News: Sept. 28, 2009 [cited 2012 Sept. 21]. www.abcnews.go.com/Health/MindMoodNew/unintended-surrogate-mom-wrong-embryo-faces-heartbrak-birth/story?id=8675885#.

  15. Paxman L. Mail Online {Internet]. 2011 Nov. 17; cited 2012 Dec. 3]. www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2062679/Couple-miracle-twins-IVF-mix-forced-couples-bably.html.

  16. Options Nat. Fertility Registry v. Dr. Allon (Jud. Dis. 190th, Harris Cty. TX,1/10/2005), referenced in Crockin SL, Jones HW. Legal conceptions: the evolving law and policy of assisted reproductive technologies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jaycee B. v. Superior Court of Orange County, 49 Cal. Rptr. 2d 694 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996); In re Marriage Buzzanca, 72 Cal. Rptr. 2d. 280 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998), review denied, No. S069696, 1998 Cal. LEXIS 3830 (Cal 6/10/98).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. [Internet] Birmingham, AL. 1996–2012 [cited 2012 Nov. 30]. http://www.sart.org.

  19. Kamakhi v. American Society for Reproductive Medicine et al., No. 11 CV 1781, complaint filed (N.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2012 Sept. 28 [cited 2012 Oct. 27];1:[about 7pp]; article in press. http://www.asrm.org;uploadedFiles/ASRM_Content/News_and_Publications/Practice_Committee_Opinions/ROvarian_tissue-and-oocyte(1)pdf

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kalfogulou AL, Geller G. A follow-up study with oocyte donors, exploring their experiences, knowledge, and attitudes about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation. Fertil Steril 2004: 82:S304; Jensen C, Zweifel J, Davidson M, et al. Comparative assessment of pre and post-donation attitudes with respect to potential oocyte and embryo disposition among ovum donors in an egg program. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: S304.Golombok S, Readings J, Blake L, Casey P, Mellish, Larks A, Vasanti J. Children conceived by gamete donation: psychological adjustment and mother-child relationships at age 7. JFP. 2011 25.2: 230–239.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Washington State: RCW 26.26.750.

    Google Scholar 

  23. http://www.donorsiblingregistry.com

  24. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion, Fertil Steril [Internet]. Oct. 2012(article in press) [cited 2012 Dec. 3]; 1:[about 17 pp]. http://www.asrm.org;uploadedFiles/ASRM_Content/News_and_Publications/Practice_Guidelines/Guidelines_and_Minimum_Standards/2008_Guidelines_for_gamete(1).pdf, and Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for informed consent: a committee opinion, Fertil Steril 2006 Nov; 86 Suppl.4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Swain M. A brief history of informed consent: how evolving concepts play out in ART cases. Fam Adv. 2011;34(2):18–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Law Office of Margaret E. Swain, Towson, MD, 21204, USA

    Margaret E. Swain R.N., J.D.

Authors
  1. Margaret E. Swain R.N., J.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret E. Swain R.N., J.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University Hospitals of Cleveland Case Western Reserve University, Director of Fertility Services and In Vitro Fertilization, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

    James M. Goldfarb

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Swain, M.E. (2014). Oocyte Donation: Legal Aspects. In: Goldfarb, J. (eds) Third-Party Reproduction. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7169-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7169-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7168-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7169-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation