Abstract
A growing interest in families and family policy has led to significant new policies in Italy in recent years. Since the fall of 2008, in fact, international financial and economic turmoil has profoundly shaped and impacted the course of reform processes around the world. Considerable differences have emerged in terms of economic performance and the ability of individual states to respond to the crisis with appropriate social measures. Not all welfare regimes, in fact, have adapted to the changing society and labor market. In Italy, the process of welfare reconstructing has developed slowly, moving in the direction of a liberal work-family system that in reality is increasing inequalities (Riva, 2012). The deeply rooted cultural and political resistance to change, together with current budget constraints (Kazepov & Genova), conservative gender-specific division of labor within the family, and a familialism ideology (the male breadwinner being the primarily responsible for the well-being of all family members), has made welfare state reforms hard to implement. However, due to the European Union political and normative initiatives, recently interesting changes especially in work-family policies have taken place in the country. One of the major problems facing Italy today is tension over whether to allocate more resources to job development or to the expansion of social protection, which adds up to the pressures of globalization and the Europeant Monetary Unit, the lack of infractructures, the need for institutional reforms, the issue of federalism, the discrepacy between the north and the south, the major problems of povery, housing, education and social exclusion, the integration of immigrants and a pattern of income distribution that ia smong the most unequal in the OECD countries. There is tension over whether to allocate more resources to job development or to the expansion of social protection. The chapter overviews the latest updates in family policies and practices and critically discusses their implications and their consequences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antonucci, L. (2012). European social policy in defense of the welfare state: The British and the Italian manifesto. Poston inequalities. Retrieved from http://inequalitiesblog.wordpress.com/2012/02/02/national-epistemic-communities-and-european-welfare-cuts-welfare-defense-manifestos-in-the-uk-and-in-italy/
Barrazzetti, D., Garreffa, F., & Marsico, R. (2007). Daphne project “proposing new indicators: Measuring violence’s effects.” Gvei (Gender Violence Effect Indicator). National Report Italia. University of Calabria, Women’s Studies.
Bergamini, P. (2012). Portrait of the family. Traces,1. Retrieved from www.traces-cl.com/2012/01/portraitofthefamily.html
Boeri, T. (2000). Structural change, welfare systems and labor reallocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boeri, T., & Ferrera, M. (2001). EU social policies: Challenges and opportunities for Italy. The International Spectator, 36(3), 77–89.
CEDAW. (2005). Report of the committee on the elimination of discrimination against women, A/60/38. United Nations economic and social council (EC OSOC ). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/docs/ecosoc/
Daly, M. (2003). Governance and social policy. Journal of Social Policy, 32(1), 113–128.
Deidda, A., & Tedeschi, G. (2012). Labor ministry publishes new 2012 notional remuneration tables. Flash international executive alert, 058. Retrieved from http://www.kpmg.com/US/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/flash-international-executive-alert/Documents/flash-international-executive-alert-2012-058-mar.pdf
Department for Family Policies. (2012). Prime Minister’s office. European year for active ageing and solidarity between generations national work program. For active, lively, dignified ageing in a supportive society. Retrieved from europa.eu/ey2012/ajax/BlobServlet?docId = 7432&langId = en
Department of Social Affairs. (1996). Report on the condition of children in Italy. President of the Council of Ministers.
European Commission. (2011a). New analysis shows employment and social policies key to Europe’s job-rich recovery. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp
European Commission. (2011b). Statistical portraits of the social situation 2010. Eurostat Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
European Commission. (2012a). The EU contribution to active ageing and solidarity between generations . Retrieves from http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp
European Commission. (2012b). Employment and social developments in Europe 2011. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, Directorate A.
Fargion, S. (2012). Synergies and tensions in child protection and parent support: Policy lines and practitioners cultures. Child & Family Social Work. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.
Ferrera, M. (1996). The ‘Southern Model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal Of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.
Ferrera, M. (1997). General introduction. In MIRE (Ed.), Comparing social welfare systems in Southern Europe (Vol. 3, Florence Conference) (pp. 13–24). Paris: Mission Recherche Et Expérimentation (Mire).
Ferrera, M. (2000). Targeting welfare in a ‘Soft’ state: Italy’s winding road to selectivity. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Targeting social benefits. International perspectives and trends (pp. 157–186). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Ferrera, M. (2005). Welfare states and social safety nets in Southern Europe. In M. Ferrera (Ed.), Welfare state reform in southern Europe. Fighting poverty and social exclusion in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece (pp. 1–32). Oxon: Routledge.
Ferrera, M., & Hemerijck, A. (2003). Recalibrating the welfare state. In J. Zeitlin & D. M. Trubek (Eds.), Governing work and welfare in a new economy (pp. 88–127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gianesini, G. (2000). A multivariate approach to the dynamic of violence within intimate relationships: An application of theory of coercive power in exchange. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.
Girard, P. (1995). Why Canada has no family policy: Lessons from France and Italy. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 32(3), 580–611.
Gori, C. (Ed.). (2011). What is the future of welfare? Social policies and development prospective. A data analysis. [Quale Futuro Per Il Welfare? Le Politiche Sociali Tra Delega Assistenziale E Prospettive Di Sviluppo Un’analisi A Partire Dai Dati].
Grrrl, O. (2010). Rebel Grrrls; Italian women’s resistance strategies to domestic violence. Retrieved from http://olivegrrl.wordpress.com/2010/06/26/rebel-grrrls
Henneck, R. (2003). Family policy in the US, Japan, Germany, Italy and France: Parental leave, child benefits, family allowance, child care, marriage/cohabitation and divorce. Retrieved from www.contemporaryfamilies.org/work-family/fampolicy.html
International Reform Monitor. (2012). Social policy, labor market policy, industrial relations. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/llp/national_en.html
ISFOL. (2010). Le misure regionali di contrasto alla crisi occupazionale connesse con l’ Accordo Stato [Regional Measures against unemployment linked to State Agreements] Regioni del Febbraio 2009, ISFOL, Roma.
ISTAT. (2012). Italy in figures. Italian National Statistical Institute.
Italian Department for Family Policies (2012). National Work programme. European year for Active Ageing and Solidariety between generations. retrieved online at: europa.eu/ey2012/ajax/BlobServlet?docId=7432&langId=en.
Kamerman, S. B., & KahnA, J. (2000). Child and family policies in an era of social policy retrenchment and restructuring. In K. Vleminckx & T. M. Smeeding (Eds.), Child well-being, child poverty and child policy in modern nations (pp. 501–525). Bristol: The Policy Press.
Kazepov, Y. (Ed.). (2004). Cities of Europe. Changing contexts, local arrangements and the challenge of urban cohesions. Oxford: Blackwell.
Knijn, T., & Saraceno, C. (2009). Family law and family policy reforms in Italy and the Netherlands: Different timings, increasingly different focuses. Paper presented at the 7th ESPAnet Conference 2009 Session: nr. 21- Explaining Recent Shifts in Family Policy.
Krause, E. L., & Marchesi, M. (2007). Fertility politics as “social Viagra”: Reproducing boundaries, social cohesion and modernity in Italy. American Anthropologist, 109(2), 350–362.
Luck, D. (2006). The impact of gender role attitudes on women’s life courses. In H. P. Blossfld & H. Hofmeister (Eds.), Globalization, uncertainty and women’s career. An international comparison. Cheltenham: Edwards Elgar.
Micheli, G. A. (2005). Critical aspect and exemplifications of the strong family model. Italian Journal of Social Policies. Retrieved from http://ediesseonline.it/riviste/rps/english/families-and-welfare-states
Mental Health Europe (MHE). (2012). The Mental Health Europe Annual Report 2010. European Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity (2007–2013). Retrieved online at: http://www.mhe-sme.org/http://www.civitas.org.uk/
Morgan, P. (2006). Family policies, family changes: Sweden, Italy and Britain compared. London: The Institute for the Study of Civil Society. Retrieved from www.civitas.org.uk
Ministero dell’Interno (2002). Legge 30 luglio 2002, n. 189 (Legge Bossi-Fini). Retrieved at:_http://www.interno.gov.it/mininterno/site/it/sezioni/servizi/legislazione/immigrazione/legislazione_424.htmlhttp://www.civitas.org.uk/
OECD. (2011). Doing better for families. Paris: Author.
Plantenga, J., & Remery, C. (2005). Reconciliation of work and private life. A comparative review of thirty European Countries. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Plantenga, J., & Remery, C. (2009). The provision of childcare services. A comparative review of 30 European countries. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Raimondi, F. (2005). Centri di Permanenza Temporanea (CTP). Administrative detention centers the new borders of exploitation. Nolager.org. Retrieved from http://www.noborder.org/nolager/more/display.php?id=14
Regini M., & Colombo, S. (2008, May 9–10). Italy: The un easy co-existence of different social models. Paper presented at the Conference The Nordic Model: Solutions for Continental Europe’s problems? Center for European Studies, Harvard University. Retrieved from http://www.forumterzosettore.it/multimedia/allegati/FORUM%20Il%20Welfare%20di%20domani%20(file%20per%20il%20web).pdf
Riva, E. (2012, June 14–16). The emergence of a political discourse on work-family policies in Italy and the risk of new inequalities. Paper presented at the Inaugural meeting of the new Work and Family Researchers Network New York City.
Ronfani, P. (2001). Children, law and social policy in Italy. International Journal of Law Policy and Family, 15(2), 276–289. doi:10.1093/lawfam/15.2.276.
Rossi, G. (2012, September 13–15). Sociology of families and intimate lives. Paper presented at the European Sociological Association (ESA), Milan (Italy).
Sabatinelli, S. (2009) Measures of social assistance. [Le misure di assistenza sociale]. In Y. Kazepov (Ed.) The territorial dimension of social policies in Italy [“La dimensione territoriale delle politiche sociali in Italia”], Carocci.
Sabatinelli, S. (2010). Activation and rescaling: Interrelated questions in social policy? In Y. Kazepov (Ed.), Rescaling social policies towards multilevel governance in Europe. Avebury: Ashgate.
Saraceno, C. (1998). Family changes and social policies in Italy. [Mutamenti della famiglia e politiche sociali in Italia]. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Sgritta, G. (2002). The situation of families in Italy-2001. European observatory on the social situation, demography, and family. Retrieved from http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/eoss/index_en.html
Sundstrom, E. (2003). Gender regimes, family policies and attitudes to female employment: A comparison of Germany, Italy, and Sweden. Doctoral dissertation in Sociology at the Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå University.
The Clearinghouse of International Developments (2012). Section 1: Comparative Child, Youth and Family Policies and Programs: Benefits and Services.
The Clearinghouse on International Developments in Child, Youth and Family Policies at Columbia University. (2001). Section 1: Comparative Child, Youth and Family Policies and Programs: Benefits and Services. Retrieved from Http://Www.Childpolicyintl.Org/Countries/Italy02.Html
The Manifesto for the welfare of the XXI century (2010). Italian Journal of Social Policies, Retrieved at: http://www.ediesseonline.it/files/eventi/presentazioni/Manifesto%20Welfare%20XXI%20secolo_Rps.pdf.
Tosi, A. (2003). European observatory on homelessness. Italy National Report On Homelessness Policy.
Trifiletti, R. (1995). Family obligations in Italy. In J. Millar & W. Andrea (Eds.), Defining family obligations in Europe (Social policy papers, Vol. 23). The International Sociological Association’s Research Committee on Poverty, Social Welfare and Social Policy (RC19). August 20–22, 2009. University of Montreal, Canada.
Trifiletti, R. (1998). Identification processes and policy making. Life Stories in Florence. [Processi identitari e costruzione delle politiche. Storie di vita a Firenze]. In F. Bimbi (Ed.), Lonely mothers. Processes of social inclusion and exclusion. [Le madri sole. Processi di inclusione ed esclusione sociale.].
Trifiletti, R. (2003). Giving a gender to the flexible man. Measures of women’s employment in the post-Ford era. [Dare un genere all’uomo flessibile. Le misurazioni del lavoro femminile nel post-fordismo]. In F. Bimbi (Ed.), Difference and inequalities. Prospectives for gender studies in Italy [Differenze e diseguaglianze. Prospettive per gli studi di genere in Italia] (pp. 101–159). Bologna, Il Mulino.
Trifiletti, R. (2009). Local social policies, family policies, models of service systems and their chances to converge or diverge in Italy after 2000. The International Sociological Association’s Research Committee on Poverty, Social Welfare and Social Policy (RC19). August 20–22, 2009. University of Montreal, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.cccg.umontreal.ca/RC19/PDF/Trifiletti-R_Rc192009.pdf
Villa, P. (2005). Reconciliation of work and private life in Italy 2005. EWERC, The University of Manchester.
Y.Kazepov, M.Arlotti, E.Barberis, B daRoit, S.Sabatinelli (2006). Rescaling Social Welfare Policies in Italy. National report by European Centre for social welfare policy and resarch. Retrieved at:http://www.euro.centre.org/detail.php?xml_id=89
Zanatta, A. L. (1998). Special report: Children issues in Italy, in European observatory on national family policies. Developments in National Family Policies 1996, The European Commission, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gianesini, G. (2014). Family Patterns of Change in Italy: Challenges, Conflicts, Policies, and Practices. In: Robila, M. (eds) Handbook of Family Policies Across the Globe. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6771-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6771-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6770-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6771-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)