Skip to main content

Forensic Linguistics

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 4,350.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 4,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading and References

  • Austin JL (1692) How to do things with words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen RH, van Halteren H, Neijt A, Tweedie F (2002) An experiment in authorshihp attribution. In: Proceedings of JADT 2002, Université de Rennes, St. Malo, pp 29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch B (1948) A set of postulates for phonemic analysis. Language 24:3–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher A (2008) Linguistic aspects of Australian Aboriginal English. Clin Linguist Phonet 22:625–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambier-Langeveld T (2007) Current methods in forensic speaker identification. Int J Speech Lang Law 14(2):223–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard M (2004) Author identification, idiolect, and linguistic uniqueness. Appl Linguist 25(4):431–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard M, Johnson A (2007) An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Criminal Code, R.S. c. C-46 (1985) Retrieved from http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-46/index.html. Accessed 11 June 2013, 11:14 PST

  • Drew P, Heritage J (eds) (1992). Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings (Studies in interaction sociolinguistics, 3 edn). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadden L (2012) Forensic discourse analysis. In Chapelle C (ed) The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadden L, LaFrance J (2010) Advancing aboriginal English. Can J Native Education 32

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In Jaworski A, Coupland N (eds) The discourse reader. Routledge, New York, pp 76–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning A (1989) Markedness – The first 150 years. In Tomic O (ed), Markedness in synchrony and diachrony. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 11–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday M, Hasan R (1976) Cohesion in English. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Joula P, Baayen H (2005) A controlled-corpus experiment in authorship Identification by cross-entropy. Lit Linguist Comput 20(Suppl 1):59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Juola P, Sofko J, Brennan P (2006) A prototype for authorship attribution Software. Lit Linguist Comput 21:169–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersta L (1962) Voiceprint identification. Nature 196:1253–12857

    Google Scholar 

  • Keselj V, Cercone N (2004) CNG method with weighted voting. Ad-Hoc Authorship Attribution Contest ACH/ALLC. Gothenburg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiman J, Sidtis D (2011) Foundations of voice studies. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov W (1966) The linguistic variable as a structural unit. Washington Linguist Rev 3:4–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov W, Ash S, Boberg C (2005) Atlas of North American English. de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged P (1982) A course in phonetics. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged P (1984) Review: the phonetic bases of speaker recognition by F.J. Nolan. J Phonet 12:85–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged P, Disner S (2012) Vowels and consonants. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • McGehee F (1937) The reliability of the identification of the human voice. J Gen Psychol 17:249

    Google Scholar 

  • McMenamin G (2002) Forensic linguistics: advances in forensic stylistics. CRC Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison G (2010) Forensic voice comparison. In Freckelton I, Selby H (eds), Expert evidence (Ch. 99). Thomson Reuters, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison G (2009) Forensic voice comparison and the paradigm shift. Sci Just 49:298–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson J (2004) Forensic linguistics: an introduction to language, crime, and the law. Continuum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Prideaux G (2011) Linguistic contributions to the analysis of hate language. Int J Law Lang Discourse 1(1):27–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks H, Schegloff, Jefferson G (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4):696–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon R, Scollon S (1979) An ethnography of speaking at Fort Chippewyan, Alberta. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle J (1969) Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of lanaguage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuy R (1967) Discovering American dialects. National Counsel of Teachers of English, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuy R (2002) Linguistic battles in trademark disputes. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuy R (2005) Creating language crimes: how law enforcement uses (and misuses) language. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Solan L (2011) Ethics and method in forensic linguistics. In Tomblin S, MacLeod N, Sousa-Silva R, Coulthard M (eds), Proceedings of the international association of forensic linguists’ 10th biennial conference. Centre for Forensic Linguistics, Aston

    Google Scholar 

  • Svartvik J (1968) The Evans Statements: a case for forensic linguistics. University of Gothenburg Press, Gothenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman R, Kessler B, Bick S (2002) Context sensitivity in the spelling of English vowels. J Mem Language 47:448–468

    Google Scholar 

  • van Halteren H, Baayen RH, Tweedie F, Haverkort M, Neijt A (2005) New machine learning methods demonstrate the existence of a human stylome. J Quant Linguist 12(1):65–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardhaugh R (1986) Introduction to sociolinguistics, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorna Fadden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Fadden, L., Disner, S.F. (2014). Forensic Linguistics. In: Bruinsma, G., Weisburd, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_534

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_534

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5689-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5690-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics