Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Challenges in Choosing the Mix of Public and Private Standards for Food Quality Assurance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
US Programs Affecting Food and Agricultural Marketing

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 38))

Abstract

Several federal agencies have mandates to regulate and/or oversee and support the provision of agricultural and food quality in the USA. Federal policy and regulatory choices determine the resulting mix of public and private responsibility for quality assurance. This chapter presents a framework for analyzing and evaluating federal programs based on the quality attributes they target, their policy rationales, and the policy instruments (mandatory and voluntary) they use, including types of labeling. This framework is applied to survey the quality assurance programs of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Department of Agriculture in the areas of food safety, nutrition, sensory/organoleptic, value/function, and process attributes. The federal government faces several challenges in adjusting its policies and regulations in order to develop a more effective mix of activities targeted at agricultural and food quality assurance. These challenges include scrutinizing rationales for marketing policies across agricultural and food quality attributes and evaluating the mix of mandatory regulatory versus voluntary market oversight/support approaches used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akerlof G (1970) The market for ‘lemons’: Qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84:488-500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Leafy Green Product Handler Marketing Agreement. 2011. http://www.caleafygreens.ca.gov/ . Accessed 9 May 2011.

  • Carriquiry MA, Babcock BA (2007) Reputations, market structure and the choice of quality assurance systems in the food industry. Am J Agr Econ 89(1):12-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell JA (2006) Quality Assurance, information tracking, and consumer labeling. Marine Pollution Bulletin 53(10-12):650-656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell JA, Anders SM (2011) Private versus third party versus. government labeling. In: Lusk J, Rosen J, Shogren J. (ed) The handbook of the economics of food consumption and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell JA, Mojduszka EM (1996) Using informational labeling to influence the market for ­quality in food products. Am J Agr Econ 78(5):1248-1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell JA, Noelke CM, Mojduszka EM (2002) Unifying two frameworks for analyzing quality and quality assurance for food products. In: Krissoff B, Bohman M, Caswell JA (ed) Global food trade and consumer demand for quality. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby MR, Karni E (1973) Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics 16: 67-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register (2007) Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, 7 CFR Part 246, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC): Revisions in the WIC Food Packages; Interim Rule 72 (234): 68966-69032. http://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/regspublished/wicfoodpkginterimrulepdf.pdf

  • Fulponi L (2006) Private voluntary standards in the food system: The perspective of major food retailers in OECD countries. Food Policy 31:1-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Martinez M, Fearne A, Caswell JA, Henson S (2007) Co-regulation as a possible model for food safety governance: Opportunities for public-private partnerships. Food Policy 32(3):299-314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner B (2003). U.S. food quality standards: Fix for market failure or costly anachronism? Am J Agr Econ 85(3):725-730.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLOBALG.A.P. (2011) http://www.globalgap.org/cms/front_content.php?idcat=9 . Accessed 9 May 2011.

  • Golan E, Kuchler F, Mitchell, L (2001). Economics of food labeling. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Economic Report No. 793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henson SJ (2008) The role of public and private standards in regulating international food markets. Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development 4(1):63-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • SQF Institute (2011) http://www.sqfi.com/. Accessed 9 May 2011.

  • Klein B, Leffler KB (1981) The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. Journal of Political Economy 89 (4):615-641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academies, National Research Council (2005) WIC food packages: Time for a change. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academies, National Research Council. (2008) Nutrition standards and meal requirements for National School Lunch and Breakfast Programs: Phase I. Proposed approach for recommending revisions. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academies, National Research Council (2010) School meals: Building blocks for healthy children. The Nation (2010) Enhancing food safety: The role of the Food and Drug Administration. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson P (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy 78:311-329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson P (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy 81:729-754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JP, Hill LD, Nelson KE (1983) Food and agricultural commodity grading. In: Armbruster WJ, Henderson DR, Knutson RD (ed) Federal marketing programs in agriculture: Issues and options.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollinger M, Mueller V (2003). Managing for safer food: The economics of sanitation and process controls in meat and poultry plants. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Agricultural Economic Report No. (AER817).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollinger M, Moore D, Chandran R (2004) Meat and poultry plants’ food safety investments: Survey findings. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Technical Bulletin No. (TB-1911). http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/TB1911/

  • Federal Register (2012) Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, 7 CFR Parts 210 and 220, Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs 77 (17):4088-4167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruzante JM, Davidson VJ, Caswell JA, Fazil A, Cranfield JAL, Henson SJ, Anders SM, Schmidt C, Farber JM (2010) A multifactorial risk prioritization framework for foodborne pathogens. Risk Analysis 30 (5):724-742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service (2011a) (Various sites accessed on 9 May 2011.). http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/Grading. http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/Standards. http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateA&navID=GradingCertificationandVerfication&leftNav=GradingCertificationandVerfication&page=GradingCertificationAndVerification&acct=AMSPW. http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/processverified

  • United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service (2011b) Proposed Marketing Agreement for Leafy Greens. (Accessed 9 May 2011). http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/leafygreensagreement

  • U.S. General Accounting Office (2001) Food safety and security—Fundamental changes needed to ensure safe food. GAO-02-47 T, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Massachusetts Amherst, 80 Campus Center Way, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA

    Julie A. Caswell

Authors
  1. Julie A. Caswell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie A. Caswell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Farm Foundation, Darien Club Drive 1709, Darien, 60561, Connecticut, USA

    Walter J. Armbruster

  2. Texas A&M University, Rose Circle 1011, College Station, 77840, Texas, USA

    Ronald D. Knutson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Caswell, J.A. (2013). Challenges in Choosing the Mix of Public and Private Standards for Food Quality Assurance. In: Armbruster, W., Knutson, R. (eds) US Programs Affecting Food and Agricultural Marketing. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 38. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4930-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4930-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4929-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4930-0

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation