Skip to main content

Environmental Enforcement Networks: Their Role in Climate Change Enforcement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change from a Criminological Perspective

Abstract

Climate change regulation, like all forms of regulation, requires allegations of non-compliance to be investigated. Enforcing climate change law and regulations is already sufficiently challenging given a myriad of social, economic and environmental issues. However, climate change regulation is further complicated due to cross-jurisdictional issues, transnational factors and its intersection with traditional and crossover crimes such as fraud and money laundering. It is anticipated that both non-compliant entities and organised criminal enterprises will challenge and frustrate the efforts of government regulators as they attempt to enforce climate change legislation. Therefore climate change regulators have much to learn from the experiences of other enforcement and regulatory agencies that have cooperated and worked collaboratively through various Environmental Enforcement Networks to advance and maximise their enforcement effort. This chapter considers the opportunities for cooperation, it recommends the establishment of a Climate Change Enforcement Network, and provides information for consideration if such a network was established.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Asian Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Network (AECEN). (2010). Nepal and Malaysia Finalize Twinning Partnership Work Program. Website – News release, 5 May 2010. Retrieved 2011, July 18 from http://www.aecen.org/nepal-and-malaysia-finalize-twinning-partnership-work-program.

  • Association of Southeast Asian Nations Wildlife Enforcement Network (ASEAN-WEN). (n.d). Wildlife Enforcement Network: Action Update July-September 2010. Retrieved 2011, July 18 from http://www.asean-wen.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=  45&Itemid  =  96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, P. (2005). Developing transformational leadership capability in the public service. Public Administration Today, 3, 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australasian Environmental Law Enforcement and Regulators neTwork (AELERT). (2011a). Background. Retrieved 2011, January 06 from http://www.aelert.com.au/?page_id=5.

  • Australasian Environmental Law Enforcement and Regulators neTwork (AELERT). (2011b). Australian-Vietnamese Twinning Program—Phase 2. Website – News Release, 24 March 2011. Retrieved 2011, July 18 from http://www.aelert.com.au/?p=1274.

  • Australian Public Service Commission. (2007). Tackling wicked problems—A policy perspective. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartel, R. (2008, April). The formal and informal orders in land clearance regulation in Australia. Paper presented in International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement (INECE), 8th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Proceedings. Cape Town, South Africa (pp. 435–443). London: Cameron May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, G. (2006). Environmental law in Australia (6th ed.). Chatswood, New South Wales: LexisNexis Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, V. (2006). Ten things you need to know about regulation but never wanted to ask. [Occasional Paper 10] Regulatory Institutions Network, Canberra: Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricknell, S. (2010). Environmental crime in Australia. In AIC Reports: Research and public policy series 109. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, L. (2006). Project management and organisational change, speech delivered at the Australian New Zealand School of Government - Prime Minister and Cabinet conference, 21 February 2006. Retrieved 2008, October 1 from http://www.apsc.gov.au/media/briggs210206.htm.

  • Carnegie Mellon University. (2011). Capability maturity model: Integration. Retrieved 2011, March 14 from http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/.

  • Du Rées, H. (2009). Can criminal law protect the environment? In R. White (Ed.), Environmental crime: A reader (pp. 638–655). Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. (1998). State and local environmental enforcement. In M. Clifford (Ed.), Environmental crime: enforcement, policy and social responsibility. Maryland: Aspen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, A. (2007). Handbook of environmental protection and enforcement: Principles and practice. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J., & Wood, J. D. (Eds.). (2006). Fighting crime together: The challenges of policing and security networks. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerardu, J. J. A., & Zaelke, D. (2005). The importance of international environmental enforcement networks. Environmental Law Network International, 2, 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Victoria. (2007). Victorian approaches to joined up government: An overview. Melbourne: Government of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiss, R., Ruessink, H., Isarin, N., Koparova, M., & Grabiel, D. (2011). International hazardous waste inspection project at seaports: results and recommendations. In INECE 9th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, Conference Proceedings, 20–24 June 2011, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada (pp. 192–203). Washington: International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelman, A. T. (2001). On coalition and the transformation of power relationships: Collaborative betterment and collaborative empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelman, A. T. (2002). Collaboration for a change: Definitions, decision-making models, roles, and collaboration process guide. Minneapolis: Himmelman Consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2004). Doing things collaboratively: realizing the advantage or succumbing to inertia? Organizational Dynamics, 33(3), 190–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Law (IMPEL). (2009). Enforcement of EU Waste Shipment Regulation: “Learning by doing”. Interim Project Report, 12 October 2009. Retrieved 2011, January 18 from http://www.vrominspectie.nl/Images/Interim%20%20Report%20IMPEL%20TFS_tcm293-273297.pdf.

  • International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL). (2009a). Environmental crime. Retrieved 2011, September 14 from http://www.interpol.int/content/download/793/6403/version/14/file/PST03.pdf [Fact Sheet].

  • International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL). (2009b). Electronic waste and organised crime assessing the links: Phase II report for the Interpol pollution crimes working group. France: Interpol.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL). (2010). INTERPOL co-ordinated operation targeting illegal trade in endangered reptiles leads to arrests and seizures worldwide Retrieved 2011, December 14 from http://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/Photos [Media Release].

  • International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL). (n.d.). The INTERPOL global complex for innovation. Retrieved 2011, December 6 from http://www.interpol.int/About-INTERPOL/The-INTERPOL-Global-Complex-for-Innovation.

  • International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement (INECE). (n.d.). Raising awareness, developing networks, strengthening capacity. [Brochure].

    Google Scholar 

  • International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement—Seaport Environmental Security Network (INECE-SESN). (2010). International hazardous waste inspection project at seaports: results and recommendations. Retrieved 2011, June 18 from http://www.inece.org/seaport/exercise/INECE_SeaportInspectionProjectOutcomes_22dec.pdf.

  • Jones, D. (2002). Summary of plenary session #9: Reports of regional meetings and workshops. In INECE 6th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, April 15–19, 2002 San Jose, Costa Rica, Proceedings Volume 2. (pp. 457–465). Washington: International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement (INECE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehane, J., & Pink, G. (2011). Evolution of a regional environmental enforcement network: The Australasian Environmental Law Enforcement and Regulators neTwork (AELERT). In INECE 9th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, Conference Proceedings, 20–24 June 2011, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada (pp. 765–778). Washington: International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macken, K. (2011). Strengthening credibility in the EU ETS following security and fraud related incidents. In INECE 9th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, Conference Proceedings, 20–24 June 2011, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada (pp. 284–289). Washington: International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. (2012). State and local environmental enforcement. In M. Clifford & T. D. Edwards (Eds.), Environmental crime (2nd ed., pp. 183–214). Louisville: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Attorneys General & United States Department of Justice—environment and natural resources division. (2003). Guidelines for joint state/federal civil environmental enforcement litigation. Retrieved 2011, August 22 from http://www.justice.gov/enrd/ENRD_Assets/Guidelines-for-joint-state-federal-civil-environmental-enforcement-litigation.pdf.

  • O’Flynn, J. (2008). Elusive appeal or aspirational ideal? The rhetoric and reality of the ‘collaborative turn’ in public policy. In J. O’Flynn & J. Wanna (Eds.), Collaborative governance: A new era of public policy in Australia (pp. 181–195). Canberra: The Australian National University, ANU E-Press, Australia and New Zealand School of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, G., & Lynott, D. (2011). The effective use of environmental enforcement network in Ireland. In INECE 9th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, Conference Proceedings, 20–24 June 2011, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada (pp. 756–764). Washington: International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2005). Funding environmental compliance assurance: Lessons learned from international experience. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, G. (2008). Building regulatory capacity in environmental agencies: Through tailored training. In INECE 8th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement: 5–11 April 2008, Cape Town, South Africa, Proceedings (pp. 225–233). London: Cameron May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, G. (2010a). Government co-ordination to enforce environmental laws: The experiences of an Australian environmental regulator. Canberra: Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Compliance and Enforcement Branch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, G. (2010b). Environmental enforcement networks: A qualitative analysis. (December 7, 2010). Available at Social Science Research Network. Retrieved 2011, April 14 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1803179.

  • Pink, G. (2011). Assessing the utility of environmental enforcement networks: Maximising benefits to members. In INECE 9th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, Conference Proceedings, 20–24 June 2011, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada (pp. 797–804). Washington: International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, G., & Lehane, J. (2011). Environmental enforcement networks: Development of a network evaluation matrix. In INECE 9th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, Conference Proceedings, 20–24 June 2011, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada (pp. 805–821). Washington: International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, R. (2002). Policing international trade in endangered species: The CITES treaty and compliance. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (2006). The sour laws of network governance. In J. Fleming & J. D. Wood (Eds.), Fighting crime together: The challenges of policing and security networks (pp. 15–34). Sydney: UNSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 413–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Institute of International Affairs. (2008). The growth and control of international environmental crime: Chatham House workshop, 10–11 December 2007. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, J. (2010). Speech delivered to be 79th Interpol General Assembly, 8 November, Doha, Qatar. Retrieved 2011, June 22 from http://www.cites.org/eng/news/SG/2010/SG_statement_interpol_doha.shtml.

  • Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Socioeconomic Data Application Center (SEDAC). (n.d). Environmental Treaties and Resources Indicators (ENTRI) Website. Retrieved 2011, August 22 from http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/entri/.

  • Sparrow, M. K. (2008). The character of harms: Operational challenges in control. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speth, J. G., & Haas, P. M. (2006). Global environmental governance. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, A. (2007). Foreword. In United Nations Environment Programme. Networking Counts: Combating illegal trade in ozone depleting substances. Paris: UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suggett, D., & Goodsir, B. (2002). Triple bottom line measurement and reporting in Australia: Making it Tangible. Melbourne, Victoria: The Allen Consulting Group. Retrieved 2011, August 22 from http://www.environment.gov.au/sustainability/industry/publications/triple-bottom/index.html.

  • Taschereau, S., & Bolger, J. (2006). Networks and capacity. Maastricht: European Centre for Development Policy Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Harvard Project on Climate Agreements. (2010). Institutions for international climate governance. Policy Brief 2010-1. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Project on Climate Agreements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiernan, A., & Althaus, C. (2005). Managing out: The public sector in the community. PSM Program 2006. Canberra: Australian Public Service Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, K. (2009). Police, law enforcement and the environment. In Environmental Crime: a reader (pp. 515–527). Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2007). Networking counts: Combating illegal trade in ozone depleting substances. Paris: UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2008a). Environmental crime: Guidance note to UNODC field offices—18 December 2008. Thailand: UNODC.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2008b). Building capacity to counter trafficking in illegal timber and timber products in East Asia and the pacific region. [Draft concept]. Thailand: UNODC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Schraaf, A. (2008). Capacity building in the Dutch inspectorate: Bridging the gap. In INECE 8th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement: 5–11 April 2008 Cape Town, South Africa. Proceedings (pp. 243–251). London: Cameron May.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2008). Crimes against nature: Environmental criminology and ecological justice. Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2010). Globalisation and environmental harm. In R. White (Ed.), Global environmental harm: Criminological perspectives (pp. 3–19). Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2011a). Transnational environmental crime: Toward an co-global criminology. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2011b). Environmental law enforcement: The importance of global networks and collaborative practices. Australasian Policing: A Journal of Professional Practice and Research, 3(1), 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijbenga, B., Ruessink, H., De Wit, A., & Kapitein, P. (2008). Environmental policing in the 21st century – Background, organisation and experience in the Netherlands. In INECE 8th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, 5–11 April 2008. Cape Town, South Africa. Proceedings (pp. 323–333). London: Cameron May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. (2006). The governance of sustainable development in Wales. Local Environment, 11(3), 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkworth, G. (2006). Ordinary officials – Building community capacity through cross-sectoral collaboration. Public Administration Today, 9 (October–December), 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Grant Pink or James Lehane .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: The Network Evaluation Matrix

Appendix: The Network Evaluation Matrix

Absent criteria

Members

Finances

Governance

Support

Deliverables

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Emerging criteria

Members

Finances

Governance

Support

Deliverables

Membership

Typically low within network’s sphere of influence

Restricted to core member agencies or individuals operating within network’s sphere of influence

Budget

Nonexistent or modest to initiate/commence the network

Access

Member access to foundational and guiding documents

No open source access to networks guiding documents

Liaison

Limited or no liaison with other networks

Events

A few events for members

Limited number of members working together on specific projects

Leadership

Few individuals/member agencies take lead role across network

Contributions

Limited in-kind contributions restricted to core member agencies or individuals

Review

Informal review by foundation members

Support base

Network effectiveness reliant on core members providing ad hoc coordination

Outcomes

Prospective members considering potential of network

Limited functionality within network to deliver outcomes

Value

Negligible or questionable value to non-core members

Core members only active participants with few benefits realised

Project funding

Non-existent or minimal

Structures

General Aims and Objectives laid down

Typically developing and fluid

No written procedures

Supporting functions

Base level administrative tasks undertaken for network A few key individuals maintain the network

Products

Low number of publications disseminated

Publication limited to contributions of members

Fragile criteria

Members

Finances

Governance

Support

Deliverables

Membership

Generally increasing across significant actors within network sphere of influence

Budget

Contributions are spasmodic and are made by small number of sources

Not sustainable

Access

Central repository of information and communiqués to members

Limited open source access to network’s guiding documents

Liaison

Emergent and exploratory liaison with other networks undertaken

Information sought from other networks

Events

Irregular events with increasing frequency

Preliminary attempts to undertake cooperative exercises

Leadership

Wider range of key individuals/member agencies taking on leadership roles across network

Contributions

Few core member agencies/individuals providing in-kind support

Review

Regular changing of operating rules, Constitutional documents, etc. to fit circumstances

Support base

Growing level of support base

Increasing numbers of interested individuals

Outcomes

Low level coordination to deliver outcomes

Members seeking benefits

Value

Tangible benefits available for active members

Most members inactive/passive and question value of network

Low level communications disseminated to members from core members

Project funding

Very limited, if available

Sourced from lead member in project team

Structures

Guiding documentation developed reactively to situations.

Clear Aims and Objects set out for network

Supporting functions

Central support function to support membership and administrative tasks only

Products

Infrequent publications being developed and disseminated

Range of network members contributing to publications

Maturing Criteria

Members

Finances

Governance

Support

Deliverables

Membership

Expanded to reach critical/core number of potential members within relevant network area of operation

Budget

Sufficient funding for network to continue for short to medium term (2–3 years)

Access

Increasing access of members to network steering/guiding documents

Open source access to limited network produced documents

Liaison

Interest by and liaison with other networks

Capacity and capability discussions to identify areas of commonality

Events

Held on semi-regular basis

Delivered across network

Range of events relevant to all members

Restricted range of members working conjointly

Leadership

Critical mass of individuals/member agencies take on leadership roles

Wide range of membership not represented in leadership roles

Contributions

In-kind support provided by central member agencies/individuals

Review

Third Party review of constitutional documents and guidance considered

Support base

Widening support base across network sphere of influence

Outcomes

Member agencies receiving identifiable benefits

Individuals professionally realise benefits

Value

Leading members displaying demonstrable benefits through active participation

Level of inactive/passive members reducing

Increasing engagement and communication between members

Project funding

Project funding—increasing but ad hoc

Project leaders are able to source limited funding to support project

Structures

Proactive development of guiding documentation with consultation across membership

Development of Operation and Strategic Plans to set direction of network

Supporting functions

Administrative tasks major part of function

Low level of coordination and project capacity

Products

Are of useable standard and considered as a step toward better practice across industry

Contributions from those outside of network being included

Well Established Criteria

Members

Finances

Governance

Support

Deliverables

Membership

Maximum or near maximum of possible members within relevant operation of network coverage

Budget

Secured on permanent basis

Sustainable arrangements

Access

Open and transparent access to network steering papers across membership and support base

Foundational and guiding documents available as open source

Liaison

Level of support from other networks seen through interaction and joint activities

Good working relationships between networks

Events

Held regularly and well attended

Coordinated centrally for delivery across membership

Members readily work collaboratively

Leadership

Large proportion of members taking leadership roles across network

Contributions

High proportion of members contributing in-kind support to projects, events and initiatives

Review

Governance structures reviewed and consistent with better practice

Subject to external scrutiny and review

Support base

Strong support and contribution base from practitioner and senior management alike

Outcomes

Delivering tangible benefits to members

Serve as attractor, drawing new members into network

Members overtly promoting the benefits of involvement

Value

Majority of members realise benefits of membership attained through active participation

Open communication across members

Project funding

Projects driven by/within network are readily funded

Projects undertaken by network bring in associated funding

Structures

Robust written governance structures in place

Membership well represented on guiding body

Supporting functions

Central function for coordinating network activities, project and events

Administrative tasks are a minor part of the function

Products

High standard and considered better practice across industry

Subject to review and improvement process

Wide range of contributors to network publications

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pink, G., Lehane, J. (2012). Environmental Enforcement Networks: Their Role in Climate Change Enforcement. In: White, R. (eds) Climate Change from a Criminological Perspective. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3640-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics