Abstract
Climate change regulation, like all forms of regulation, requires allegations of non-compliance to be investigated. Enforcing climate change law and regulations is already sufficiently challenging given a myriad of social, economic and environmental issues. However, climate change regulation is further complicated due to cross-jurisdictional issues, transnational factors and its intersection with traditional and crossover crimes such as fraud and money laundering. It is anticipated that both non-compliant entities and organised criminal enterprises will challenge and frustrate the efforts of government regulators as they attempt to enforce climate change legislation. Therefore climate change regulators have much to learn from the experiences of other enforcement and regulatory agencies that have cooperated and worked collaboratively through various Environmental Enforcement Networks to advance and maximise their enforcement effort. This chapter considers the opportunities for cooperation, it recommends the establishment of a Climate Change Enforcement Network, and provides information for consideration if such a network was established.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Asian Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Network (AECEN). (2010). Nepal and Malaysia Finalize Twinning Partnership Work Program. Website – News release, 5 May 2010. Retrieved 2011, July 18 from http://www.aecen.org/nepal-and-malaysia-finalize-twinning-partnership-work-program.
Association of Southeast Asian Nations Wildlife Enforcement Network (ASEAN-WEN). (n.d). Wildlife Enforcement Network: Action Update July-September 2010. Retrieved 2011, July 18 from http://www.asean-wen.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid= 45&Itemid = 96.
Atkins, P. (2005). Developing transformational leadership capability in the public service. Public Administration Today, 3, 11–17.
Australasian Environmental Law Enforcement and Regulators neTwork (AELERT). (2011a). Background. Retrieved 2011, January 06 from http://www.aelert.com.au/?page_id=5.
Australasian Environmental Law Enforcement and Regulators neTwork (AELERT). (2011b). Australian-Vietnamese Twinning Program—Phase 2. Website – News Release, 24 March 2011. Retrieved 2011, July 18 from http://www.aelert.com.au/?p=1274.
Australian Public Service Commission. (2007). Tackling wicked problems—A policy perspective. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Bartel, R. (2008, April). The formal and informal orders in land clearance regulation in Australia. Paper presented in International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement (INECE), 8th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Proceedings. Cape Town, South Africa (pp. 435–443). London: Cameron May.
Bates, G. (2006). Environmental law in Australia (6th ed.). Chatswood, New South Wales: LexisNexis Butterworths.
Braithwaite, V. (2006). Ten things you need to know about regulation but never wanted to ask. [Occasional Paper 10] Regulatory Institutions Network, Canberra: Australian National University.
Bricknell, S. (2010). Environmental crime in Australia. In AIC Reports: Research and public policy series 109. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
Briggs, L. (2006). Project management and organisational change, speech delivered at the Australian New Zealand School of Government - Prime Minister and Cabinet conference, 21 February 2006. Retrieved 2008, October 1 from http://www.apsc.gov.au/media/briggs210206.htm.
Carnegie Mellon University. (2011). Capability maturity model: Integration. Retrieved 2011, March 14 from http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/.
Du Rées, H. (2009). Can criminal law protect the environment? In R. White (Ed.), Environmental crime: A reader (pp. 638–655). Devon: Willan Publishing.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.
Epstein, J. (1998). State and local environmental enforcement. In M. Clifford (Ed.), Environmental crime: enforcement, policy and social responsibility. Maryland: Aspen Publishers.
Farmer, A. (2007). Handbook of environmental protection and enforcement: Principles and practice. London: Earthscan.
Fleming, J., & Wood, J. D. (Eds.). (2006). Fighting crime together: The challenges of policing and security networks. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Limited.
Gerardu, J. J. A., & Zaelke, D. (2005). The importance of international environmental enforcement networks. Environmental Law Network International, 2, 3–7.
Government of Victoria. (2007). Victorian approaches to joined up government: An overview. Melbourne: Government of Victoria.
Heiss, R., Ruessink, H., Isarin, N., Koparova, M., & Grabiel, D. (2011). International hazardous waste inspection project at seaports: results and recommendations. In INECE 9th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, Conference Proceedings, 20–24 June 2011, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada (pp. 192–203). Washington: International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement.
Himmelman, A. T. (2001). On coalition and the transformation of power relationships: Collaborative betterment and collaborative empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 277–284.
Himmelman, A. T. (2002). Collaboration for a change: Definitions, decision-making models, roles, and collaboration process guide. Minneapolis: Himmelman Consulting.
Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2004). Doing things collaboratively: realizing the advantage or succumbing to inertia? Organizational Dynamics, 33(3), 190–201.
Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Law (IMPEL). (2009). Enforcement of EU Waste Shipment Regulation: “Learning by doing”. Interim Project Report, 12 October 2009. Retrieved 2011, January 18 from http://www.vrominspectie.nl/Images/Interim%20%20Report%20IMPEL%20TFS_tcm293-273297.pdf.
International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL). (2009a). Environmental crime. Retrieved 2011, September 14 from http://www.interpol.int/content/download/793/6403/version/14/file/PST03.pdf [Fact Sheet].
International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL). (2009b). Electronic waste and organised crime assessing the links: Phase II report for the Interpol pollution crimes working group. France: Interpol.
International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL). (2010). INTERPOL co-ordinated operation targeting illegal trade in endangered reptiles leads to arrests and seizures worldwide Retrieved 2011, December 14 from http://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/Photos [Media Release].
International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL). (n.d.). The INTERPOL global complex for innovation. Retrieved 2011, December 6 from http://www.interpol.int/About-INTERPOL/The-INTERPOL-Global-Complex-for-Innovation.
International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement (INECE). (n.d.). Raising awareness, developing networks, strengthening capacity. [Brochure].
International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement—Seaport Environmental Security Network (INECE-SESN). (2010). International hazardous waste inspection project at seaports: results and recommendations. Retrieved 2011, June 18 from http://www.inece.org/seaport/exercise/INECE_SeaportInspectionProjectOutcomes_22dec.pdf.
Jones, D. (2002). Summary of plenary session #9: Reports of regional meetings and workshops. In INECE 6th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, April 15–19, 2002 San Jose, Costa Rica, Proceedings Volume 2. (pp. 457–465). Washington: International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement (INECE).
Lehane, J., & Pink, G. (2011). Evolution of a regional environmental enforcement network: The Australasian Environmental Law Enforcement and Regulators neTwork (AELERT). In INECE 9th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, Conference Proceedings, 20–24 June 2011, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada (pp. 765–778). Washington: International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement.
Macken, K. (2011). Strengthening credibility in the EU ETS following security and fraud related incidents. In INECE 9th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, Conference Proceedings, 20–24 June 2011, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada (pp. 284–289). Washington: International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement.
Moore, D. (2012). State and local environmental enforcement. In M. Clifford & T. D. Edwards (Eds.), Environmental crime (2nd ed., pp. 183–214). Louisville: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
National Association of Attorneys General & United States Department of Justice—environment and natural resources division. (2003). Guidelines for joint state/federal civil environmental enforcement litigation. Retrieved 2011, August 22 from http://www.justice.gov/enrd/ENRD_Assets/Guidelines-for-joint-state-federal-civil-environmental-enforcement-litigation.pdf.
O’Flynn, J. (2008). Elusive appeal or aspirational ideal? The rhetoric and reality of the ‘collaborative turn’ in public policy. In J. O’Flynn & J. Wanna (Eds.), Collaborative governance: A new era of public policy in Australia (pp. 181–195). Canberra: The Australian National University, ANU E-Press, Australia and New Zealand School of Government.
O’Leary, G., & Lynott, D. (2011). The effective use of environmental enforcement network in Ireland. In INECE 9th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, Conference Proceedings, 20–24 June 2011, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada (pp. 756–764). Washington: International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2005). Funding environmental compliance assurance: Lessons learned from international experience. Paris: OECD.
Pink, G. (2008). Building regulatory capacity in environmental agencies: Through tailored training. In INECE 8th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement: 5–11 April 2008, Cape Town, South Africa, Proceedings (pp. 225–233). London: Cameron May.
Pink, G. (2010a). Government co-ordination to enforce environmental laws: The experiences of an Australian environmental regulator. Canberra: Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Compliance and Enforcement Branch.
Pink, G. (2010b). Environmental enforcement networks: A qualitative analysis. (December 7, 2010). Available at Social Science Research Network. Retrieved 2011, April 14 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1803179.
Pink, G. (2011). Assessing the utility of environmental enforcement networks: Maximising benefits to members. In INECE 9th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, Conference Proceedings, 20–24 June 2011, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada (pp. 797–804). Washington: International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement.
Pink, G., & Lehane, J. (2011). Environmental enforcement networks: Development of a network evaluation matrix. In INECE 9th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, Conference Proceedings, 20–24 June 2011, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada (pp. 805–821). Washington: International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement.
Reeve, R. (2002). Policing international trade in endangered species: The CITES treaty and compliance. London: Earthscan.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2006). The sour laws of network governance. In J. Fleming & J. D. Wood (Eds.), Fighting crime together: The challenges of policing and security networks (pp. 15–34). Sydney: UNSW Press.
Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 413–439.
Royal Institute of International Affairs. (2008). The growth and control of international environmental crime: Chatham House workshop, 10–11 December 2007. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Scanlon, J. (2010). Speech delivered to be 79th Interpol General Assembly, 8 November, Doha, Qatar. Retrieved 2011, June 22 from http://www.cites.org/eng/news/SG/2010/SG_statement_interpol_doha.shtml.
Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Socioeconomic Data Application Center (SEDAC). (n.d). Environmental Treaties and Resources Indicators (ENTRI) Website. Retrieved 2011, August 22 from http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/entri/.
Sparrow, M. K. (2008). The character of harms: Operational challenges in control. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Speth, J. G., & Haas, P. M. (2006). Global environmental governance. Washington: Island Press.
Steiner, A. (2007). Foreword. In United Nations Environment Programme. Networking Counts: Combating illegal trade in ozone depleting substances. Paris: UNEP.
Suggett, D., & Goodsir, B. (2002). Triple bottom line measurement and reporting in Australia: Making it Tangible. Melbourne, Victoria: The Allen Consulting Group. Retrieved 2011, August 22 from http://www.environment.gov.au/sustainability/industry/publications/triple-bottom/index.html.
Taschereau, S., & Bolger, J. (2006). Networks and capacity. Maastricht: European Centre for Development Policy Management.
The Harvard Project on Climate Agreements. (2010). Institutions for international climate governance. Policy Brief 2010-1. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Project on Climate Agreements.
Tiernan, A., & Althaus, C. (2005). Managing out: The public sector in the community. PSM Program 2006. Canberra: Australian Public Service Commission.
Tomkins, K. (2009). Police, law enforcement and the environment. In Environmental Crime: a reader (pp. 515–527). Devon: Willan Publishing.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2007). Networking counts: Combating illegal trade in ozone depleting substances. Paris: UNEP.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2008a). Environmental crime: Guidance note to UNODC field offices—18 December 2008. Thailand: UNODC.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2008b). Building capacity to counter trafficking in illegal timber and timber products in East Asia and the pacific region. [Draft concept]. Thailand: UNODC.
Van der Schraaf, A. (2008). Capacity building in the Dutch inspectorate: Bridging the gap. In INECE 8th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement: 5–11 April 2008 Cape Town, South Africa. Proceedings (pp. 243–251). London: Cameron May.
White, R. (2008). Crimes against nature: Environmental criminology and ecological justice. Devon: Willan Publishing.
White, R. (2010). Globalisation and environmental harm. In R. White (Ed.), Global environmental harm: Criminological perspectives (pp. 3–19). Devon: Willan Publishing.
White, R. (2011a). Transnational environmental crime: Toward an co-global criminology. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
White, R. (2011b). Environmental law enforcement: The importance of global networks and collaborative practices. Australasian Policing: A Journal of Professional Practice and Research, 3(1), 16–22.
Wijbenga, B., Ruessink, H., De Wit, A., & Kapitein, P. (2008). Environmental policing in the 21st century – Background, organisation and experience in the Netherlands. In INECE 8th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, 5–11 April 2008. Cape Town, South Africa. Proceedings (pp. 323–333). London: Cameron May.
Williams, P. (2006). The governance of sustainable development in Wales. Local Environment, 11(3), 253–267.
Winkworth, G. (2006). Ordinary officials – Building community capacity through cross-sectoral collaboration. Public Administration Today, 9 (October–December), 31–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: The Network Evaluation Matrix
Appendix: The Network Evaluation Matrix
Absent criteria | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Members | Finances | Governance | Support | Deliverables |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Emerging criteria | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Members | Finances | Governance | Support | Deliverables |
Membership Typically low within network’s sphere of influence Restricted to core member agencies or individuals operating within network’s sphere of influence | Budget Nonexistent or modest to initiate/commence the network | Access Member access to foundational and guiding documents No open source access to networks guiding documents | Liaison Limited or no liaison with other networks | Events A few events for members Limited number of members working together on specific projects |
Leadership Few individuals/member agencies take lead role across network | Contributions Limited in-kind contributions restricted to core member agencies or individuals | Review Informal review by foundation members | Support base Network effectiveness reliant on core members providing ad hoc coordination | Outcomes Prospective members considering potential of network Limited functionality within network to deliver outcomes |
Value Negligible or questionable value to non-core members Core members only active participants with few benefits realised | Project funding Non-existent or minimal | Structures General Aims and Objectives laid down Typically developing and fluid No written procedures | Supporting functions Base level administrative tasks undertaken for network A few key individuals maintain the network | Products Low number of publications disseminated Publication limited to contributions of members |
Fragile criteria | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Members | Finances | Governance | Support | Deliverables |
Membership Generally increasing across significant actors within network sphere of influence | Budget Contributions are spasmodic and are made by small number of sources Not sustainable | Access Central repository of information and communiqués to members Limited open source access to network’s guiding documents | Liaison Emergent and exploratory liaison with other networks undertaken Information sought from other networks | Events Irregular events with increasing frequency Preliminary attempts to undertake cooperative exercises |
Leadership Wider range of key individuals/member agencies taking on leadership roles across network | Contributions Few core member agencies/individuals providing in-kind support | Review Regular changing of operating rules, Constitutional documents, etc. to fit circumstances | Support base Growing level of support base Increasing numbers of interested individuals | Outcomes Low level coordination to deliver outcomes Members seeking benefits |
Value Tangible benefits available for active members Most members inactive/passive and question value of network Low level communications disseminated to members from core members | Project funding Very limited, if available Sourced from lead member in project team | Structures Guiding documentation developed reactively to situations. Clear Aims and Objects set out for network | Supporting functions Central support function to support membership and administrative tasks only | Products Infrequent publications being developed and disseminated Range of network members contributing to publications |
Maturing Criteria | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Members | Finances | Governance | Support | Deliverables |
Membership Expanded to reach critical/core number of potential members within relevant network area of operation | Budget Sufficient funding for network to continue for short to medium term (2–3 years) | Access Increasing access of members to network steering/guiding documents Open source access to limited network produced documents | Liaison Interest by and liaison with other networks Capacity and capability discussions to identify areas of commonality | Events Held on semi-regular basis Delivered across network Range of events relevant to all members Restricted range of members working conjointly |
Leadership Critical mass of individuals/member agencies take on leadership roles Wide range of membership not represented in leadership roles | Contributions In-kind support provided by central member agencies/individuals | Review Third Party review of constitutional documents and guidance considered | Support base Widening support base across network sphere of influence | Outcomes Member agencies receiving identifiable benefits Individuals professionally realise benefits |
Value Leading members displaying demonstrable benefits through active participation Level of inactive/passive members reducing Increasing engagement and communication between members | Project funding Project funding—increasing but ad hoc Project leaders are able to source limited funding to support project | Structures Proactive development of guiding documentation with consultation across membership Development of Operation and Strategic Plans to set direction of network | Supporting functions Administrative tasks major part of function Low level of coordination and project capacity | Products Are of useable standard and considered as a step toward better practice across industry Contributions from those outside of network being included |
Well Established Criteria | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Members | Finances | Governance | Support | Deliverables |
Membership Maximum or near maximum of possible members within relevant operation of network coverage | Budget Secured on permanent basis Sustainable arrangements | Access Open and transparent access to network steering papers across membership and support base Foundational and guiding documents available as open source | Liaison Level of support from other networks seen through interaction and joint activities Good working relationships between networks | Events Held regularly and well attended Coordinated centrally for delivery across membership Members readily work collaboratively |
Leadership Large proportion of members taking leadership roles across network | Contributions High proportion of members contributing in-kind support to projects, events and initiatives | Review Governance structures reviewed and consistent with better practice Subject to external scrutiny and review | Support base Strong support and contribution base from practitioner and senior management alike | Outcomes Delivering tangible benefits to members Serve as attractor, drawing new members into network Members overtly promoting the benefits of involvement |
Value Majority of members realise benefits of membership attained through active participation Open communication across members | Project funding Projects driven by/within network are readily funded Projects undertaken by network bring in associated funding | Structures Robust written governance structures in place Membership well represented on guiding body | Supporting functions Central function for coordinating network activities, project and events Administrative tasks are a minor part of the function | Products High standard and considered better practice across industry Subject to review and improvement process Wide range of contributors to network publications |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pink, G., Lehane, J. (2012). Environmental Enforcement Networks: Their Role in Climate Change Enforcement. In: White, R. (eds) Climate Change from a Criminological Perspective. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3640-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3640-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3639-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3640-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)