Skip to main content

Properties Evaluation of an Approach Based on Probability-Possibility Transformation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovations and Advances in Computer, Information, Systems Sciences, and Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 152))

  • 899 Accesses

Abstract

The recent research on classification problems, in fields where vague concepts have to be considered, agree on the utility of fuzzy logic. An important step of inference engines preparation is the definition of fuzzy sets. When probability distributions of concerned variables are known, they can be used to define fuzzy sets, and different methods allow to perform this transformation. A method recently proposed by authors is compared here with other existing methods, in terms of assumptions and properties about the obtained fuzzy set, also considered with respect to the probability distribution it was calculated from. The best existing transformation in terms of compromise between consistency and specificity results to be a particular case of the proposed transformation, which can therefore be considered a more general method. Moreover, it enables, with a small loss of consistency, to find more interpretable fuzzy sets, while the case of less specific fuzzy sets is comprised and justified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Axer H, Jantzen J, Berks G, Keyserlingk DGV (2000) Aphasia classification using neural networks. In: Proceedings of European Symposium on Intelligent Techniques, Aachen, pp 111–115

    Google Scholar 

  2. Axer H, Jantzen J, Keyserlingk DGV (2000) An aphasia database on the internet: a model for computer assisted analysis in aphasiology. Brain Lang 75:390–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berks G, Keyserlingk DGV, Jantzen J, Dotoli M, Axer H (2000) Fuzzy clustering—a versatile mean to explore medical databases. In: Proceedings of European Symposium on Intelligent Techniques

    Google Scholar 

  4. Castellano G, Fanelli AM, Mencar C (2003) A fuzzy clustering approach for mining diagnostic rules. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jantzen J, Axer H, Keyserlingk DGV (2000) Diagnosis of aphasia using neural and fuzzy techniques. In: Proceedings Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Learning

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tsakonas A et al (2004) Evolving rule-based systems in two medical domains using genetic programming. Artif Intell Med 32:195–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsakonas A (2006) A comparison of classification accuracy of four genetic programming-evolved intelligent structures. Inform. Sci. 176:691–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Esposito M, De Falco I, De Pietro G (2010) An evolutionary-fuzzy approach for supporting diagnosis and monitoring of Multiple Sclerosis. In: 5th Cairo International Biomedical Engineering Conference, Dec 2010, 108–111

    Google Scholar 

  9. Akbarzadeh-T M-R, Moshtagh-K M (2007) A hierarchical fuzzy rule-based approach for aphasia diagnosis J. Biomedical Inform 40:465–475

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schuerz M, Adlassnig K.-P, Lagor C, Scheider B, Grabner G (1999) http//www.erudit.de/erudit/events/esit99/12568_p.pdf

  11. Pota M, Esposito M, De Pietro G (2011) Transformation of probability distribution into a fuzzy set interpretable with likelihood view. In: IEEE 11th International Conference on Hibrid Intelligent Systems (HIS 2011), Malacca, Malaysia ( in press)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inform. Control. 8:338–353

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. d’Acierno A, De Pietro G, Esposito M (2010) Data driven generation of fuzzy systems: an application to breast cancer detection. In: Proceedings of CIBB

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dubois D, Prade H (1993) Fuzzy sets and probability: Misunderstandings, bridges and gaps. In: Second IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, San Francisco 2:1059–1068

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bilgic T, Türksen IB Measurement of membership functions: Theoretical and empirical work. In: Dubois D, Prade H (eds) Handbook of fuzzy sets and systems vol 1, Fundamentals of fuzzy sets, Kluwer, Dordrecht 195–232

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zadeh L (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:3–28

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Dubois D, Foulloy L, Mauris G, Prade H (2004) Probability-Possibility transformations, triangular fuzzy sets, and probabilistic inequalities. Reliable Comput 10:273–297

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Dubois D, Prade H (1986) Fuzzy sets and statistical data. Eur J Oper Res 25:345–356

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Yager R, Kreinovich V (2004) Entropy conserving probability transforms and the entaiment principle, Technical Report, MII-2518. Machine Intelligence Institute, Iona College

    Google Scholar 

  20. Klir GJ (1990) A principle of uncertainty and information invariance. Int. Journal of General Systems 17:249–275

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Dubois D, Prade H (1982) On several representations of uncertain body of evidence. In: In Fuzzy Informatics and Decision Processes, Gupta M.M, Sanchez E (eds), North-Holland Pub., Amsterdam 167–181

    Google Scholar 

  22. Geer JF, Klir G (1992) A mathematical analysis of information-preserving transformations between probabilistic and possibilistic formulations of uncertainty. Int J Gen Syst 20:361–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton Univerasity Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Dubois D, Prade H (1980) Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applicatios. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yamada K (2001) Probability-Possibility transformation based on evidence theory. In: IFSA World Congress and 20th NAIPS International Conference, 2001, Joint 9th, 70–75

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Pota .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pota, M., Esposito, M., De Pietro, G. (2013). Properties Evaluation of an Approach Based on Probability-Possibility Transformation. In: Elleithy, K., Sobh, T. (eds) Innovations and Advances in Computer, Information, Systems Sciences, and Engineering. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 152. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3535-8_87

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3535-8_87

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3534-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3535-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics