Skip to main content

Administrators’ Perceptions of Affirmative Action in Higher Education

  • Chapter
Affirmative Action in Perspective

Part of the book series: Recent Research in Psychology ((PSYCHOLOGY))

Abstract

The use of affirmative action programs to implement equal opportunity policies and end employment discrimination has created controversy from its inception. Debate over the necessity, advisability, impact, and effectiveness of such programs is a longstanding theme in both the popular and scholarly literature. As mandated by law, institutions of higher education have been among the earliest organizations to adopt formal affirmative action programs and to incorporate such policies as explicit goals of the organization. Additionally, higher education is often viewed both by members of the educational establishment and the public at large as the central societal institution implementing meritocratic norms and values of equal opportunity. Paradoxically, there is a clear history of failure to meet these standards. For all these reasons the university provides an ideal setting to study issues raised in the ongoing debate over affirmative action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abramson, J. (1975). The invisible women: Discrimination in the academic profession. San Francisco: Josey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, H., Carter, A., & Hirsh, W. (Eds.). (1977). Women — a challenge to higher education. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, H., & Snyder, M. (1982). Affirmative action 1972–1982: A decade of response. Change, 14, 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, A., & Astin, H. (1975). Sex differentials in the academic reward system. Science, 188, 796–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, E. (1976). The global macroproblem: Prospects for women and minorities. Liberal Education, 62,185–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, P. (1985). Discrimination, jobs, and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estler, E. (1975). Women as leaders in public education. Signs, 1, 363–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etaugh, C. (1985, April). Changes in the status of women faculty and administrators in higher education since 1972. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faia, M. (1977). Discrimination and exchange: Double burden of the female academic. Pacific Sociological Review, 20, 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, M., & Westmiller, A. (1976). Sex and race difference in nonacademic wages on a university campus. Journal of Human Resources, 11, 366–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkeistein, M. J. (1984). The status of academic women: An assessment of five competing explanations. Review of Higher Education, 7, 223–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gappa, J. (1977). Improving equity in postsecondary education. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittell, M. (1975). The illusion of AA. Change, 7, 39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. F. (1984). Women and minorities ACE fellows in the ascent toward administrative posts. Educational Record, 65, 46–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyer, P. B. (1984, April). A ten year progress report on women faculty at doctorate-granting universities. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. C., Miller, J., Miller, K., Schenbach, C., & Schoenberg, R. (1983) Work and personality: An inquiry into the impact of social stratification. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larwood, L., Gutek, B., & Gattiker, U. (1984). Perspectives on institutional discrimination and resistance to change. Group and Organization Studies, 9, 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, R. (1975). The equal pay boondoggle. Change, 7, 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. M. (1983). Leaders in transition: A national study of higher education administrators. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. M. (1984). Career in college and university administration: How are women affected? in A. Tinsley, C. Secor, & S. Kaplan (eds.) Women in Higher Education Administration. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, J., & Lorence, J. (1979). Occupational experience and the self-concept: A longitudinal study. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, B. Z., & Munson, J. M. (1981). Gender differences in managerial value systems. Psychological Report, 49, 867–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. Posner, B. Z., & Schmidt, W. H. (1984). Sex effects on managerial value systems. Human Relations, 37, 909–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickard, S. T. (1985). The chief student affairs officer: Progress toward equity. Journal of College Student Personnel, 26, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickard, S. T., & Clement, L. M. (1984). The director of admissions: Progress toward equity for women and minorities. Journal of College Admissions, 104, 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollay, S., Tickamyer, A., Bokemeier, J., & Wood, T. (1987). The impact of affirmative action in higher education: Perceptions from the front line. Paper presented at AERA Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, T. (1975). Affirmative action reconsidered: Was it necessary in academia? Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, T. (1978). Landmark or curiosity? Regulation, 2, 30–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. (1986, April). Minority (Black) faculty advancement: Recruitment, selection and promotion. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley, A., Secor, C., & Kaplan, S. (Eds.). (1984). Women in Higher Education, New Directions in Higher Education, No. 45. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touchton, J., & Shavlik, D. (1984). Senior women administrators in higher education: A decade of change, 1975–1983. Preliminary report. Washington, D.C.: Office of women in Higher Education, American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk, T. G. (1981). Women faculty in higher education. Pacific Sociological Review, 24, 212–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, B. (1985). Number of women college presidents has doubled in decade, study finds. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 31, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yount, K. (1986). A theory of productive activity: The relationships among self-concept, gender, sex role stereotypes, and work-emergent traits. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10, 63–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tickamyer, A., Scollay, S., Bokemeier, J., Wood, T. (1989). Administrators’ Perceptions of Affirmative Action in Higher Education. In: Affirmative Action in Perspective. Recent Research in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9639-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9639-0_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-96971-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9639-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics