Skip to main content

Abstract

In the 1960s Jerome Skolnick described the main problem of police in democratic society as one of effectively maintaining order while adhering to legal norms that emphasize constraint on the initiative of police authority. Contrary to what was and continues to be a common theme in American images of justice, that law and order are complementary, Skolnick argued that one necessarily is in conflict with the other. To emphasize the rule of law was to place the rights of citizens to be free from undue interference of public officials above society’s right to maintain order. To emphasize order was to place society’s need to be free from crime problems above the rights of individual citizens.

The police in democratic society are required to maintain order and to do so under the rule of law. As functionaries charged with maintaining order, they are part of the bureaucracy. The ideology of democratic bureaucracy emphasizes initiative rather than disciplined adherence to rules and regulations. By contrast, the rule of law emphasizes the rights of individual citizens and constraints upon the initiative of legal officials. This tension between the operational consequences of ideas of order, efficiency, and initiative, on the one hand, and legality on the other, constitutes the principle problem of police as a democratic legal organization.

(Skolnick, 1966:6)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Bar Association. (1973). Standards Relating to the Urban Police Function. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. (1971). A Typology of Police-Community Relations Programs. The Police Chief 38, No. 3, March: 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. (1985). Police-Community Power Sharing. In Geller W.A. (Ed.), Police Leadership in America: Crisis and Opportunity. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (1972). A Study of the New York City Police Department Anti-corruption Campaign State University of New York; NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cape, W.H. (1971). Policemen, Dissenters and Law-Abiding Citizens. The Police Chief 38, No. 11, November: 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevigny, P. (1969). Police Power: Police Abuses in New York City. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cizanckas, V. and C.W. Purviance. (1973). Changing Attitudes of Black Youths. The Police Chief 40, No. 3, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, T. (1973). Police Over-perception of Ghetto Hostility. Journal of Police Science and Administration 1, No. 2, June: 168–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culver, J.H. (1975). Policing the Police: Problems and Perspectives. Journal of Police Science and Administration 3, No. 2, June: 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, L.J. (1972). The Knapp Commission and You. The Police Chief 39, No. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, L.J. (1973). The Knapp Commission and You. The Police Chief 40, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. and W. Spelman. (1987). Who Ya Gonna Call? The Police as Problem Busters. Crime and Delinquency 33: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. (1988). The Development of the Community Patrol Officer Program: Community-Oriented Policing in the New York City Police Department. In Greene, J. and S. Mastrofski (Eds.), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feins, J.D. (1983). Partnership for Neighborhood Crime Prevention. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1975). Police Corruption: A Perspective on its Nature and Control. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1977). Policing A Free Society. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1979). Improving Police: A Problem-Oriented Approach. Crime and Delinquency 25, April: 236–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1987). Toward Community-Oriented Policing: Potential, Basic Requirements and Threshold Questions. Crime and Delinquency 33, No. 1: 6–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. (1987). Foot Patrol and Community Policing: Past Practices and Future Prospects. American Journal of Police 6, No. 1: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. and S. Mastrofski. (Eds.) (1988). Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. and R. Taylor. (1988). Community-Based Policing and Foot Patrol: Issues of Theory and Evaluation. In Greene, J. and S. Mastrofski (Eds.), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves W.E. and P.H. Rossi. (1970). Police Perceptions of a Hostile Ghetto: Realism or Projection. American Behavioral Scientist 13, No. 5 and 6: 727–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, C. (1974). Police Community Relations. Albany, NY: Delmar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanrahan, K. (1990). A Literature Review of Local Level Law Enforcement Strategies. Center for Crime Prevention Studies: Report Number 1. Newark, NJ Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanrahan, K. and L. Green. (1991). A Review of Local Level Law Enforcement Strategies: Crime Control vs Police Control. Center for Crime Prevention Studies. Internal correspondence, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, A. and D.C. Gibbons. (1984). Policing the Police, The Portland Experience. Journal of Police Science and Administration 12, No. 3 September: 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansas City Police Department. (1978). Response Time Analysis: Executive Summary. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelling, G.L. (1987). Acquiring a Taste for Order: The Community and Police. Crime and Delinquency 33, No. 1: 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Knapp Commission. (1973). The Knapp Commission Report on Police Corruption. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, J.D. and G.G.E. Misner. (1966). The Police and the Community: The Dynamics of Their Relationship in a Changing Society. A report prepared for the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, Vol. II. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. (March 1968). Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oettmeier, T.N. and L. Brown. (1988). Developing a Neighborhood-Oriented Policing Style. In Greene, J. and S. Mastrofski (Eds.), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oettmeier, T.N. and W.H. Bieck. (1986). Developing A Policing Style for Neighborhood Oriented Policing: Executive Session No. 1. Houston, TX: The Houston Police Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennsylvania Crime Commission. (1974). Report on Police Corruption and the Quality of Law Enforcement in Philadelphia. Saint Davids, PA: Pennsylvania Crime Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Criminal Justice. (1967a). The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Criminal Justice. (1967b). Task Force Report: The Police. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J. (1966). Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in a Democratic Society. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J. and D.H. Bayley. (1986). The New Blue Line: Police Innovation in Six American Cities. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelman, W. and D.K. Brown. (1984). Calling the Police: Citizen Reporting of Serious Crime. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trojanowicz, R. and B. Bucqueroux. (1990). Community Policing: A Contemporary Perspective. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trojanowicz, R. and D. Carter. (1988). The Philosophy and Role of Community Policing. Flint, MI: National Neighborhood Foot Patrol Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., J. McElroy and P. Hardyman. (1988). Challenges to Supervision in Community Policing: Observations on a Pilot Project. American Journal of Police 7, No. 2: 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.Q. and G.L. Kelling. (1982). Broken Windows. The Atlantic Monthly, March: 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weisburd, D., Uchida, C., Green, L. (1993). Raising Questions of Law and Order. In: Green, L., Weisburd, D., Uchida, C. (eds) Police Innovation and Control of the Police. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8312-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8312-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8314-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8312-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics