Abstract
Considerable effort1 has been directed toward obtaining an understanding of the observed variation of the superconducting transition temperature of a metal on the addition of impurities in terms of the details of their magnetic character. Technetium would appear to be an interesting and experimentally convenient superconducting transition metal solvent for comparison with theory. It has both a high transition temperature (7.8°K), thus making unnecessary the very low-temperature techniques needed to study such solvents as ruthenium and iridium, and an apparently high mutual solubility with the “magnetic” 3d elements.2 The 3d elements are not expected to possess well-defined local moments in solution in technetium due to technetium’s position in group VII of the periodic table,3,4 but we are unable to anticipate how closely they will approach the nonmagnetic limit.
Research sponsored jointly by the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission under contract with the Union Carbide Corporation.
AERE, Harwell, England.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
G. Gladstone, M.A. Jensen, and J.R. Schrieffer, in Superconductivity, R.D. Parks, ed., Marcel Dekker, New York (1968);
M.B. Maple, AIP Conf. Proc. 4, AIP, New York (1972), p. 175.
F.A. Shunk, Constitution of Binary Alloys, McGraw-Hill, New York (1969), 2nd Suppl.
A. M. Clogston, B.T. Matthias, M. Peter, H.J. Williams, E. Corenzwit, and R.C. Sherwood, Phys. Rev. 125, 541 (1962).
B.T. Matthias, IBM J. Res. Develop. 6, 250 (1962).
C.C. Koch and G.R. Love, J. Less Common Metals 12, 29 (1967).
W.E. Gardner and T.F. Smith, Progr. Vacuum Microbalance Tech. 1, 155 (1972).
C.C. Koch, R. Kernohan, and S.T. Sekula, J. Appl. Phys. 38, 4359 (1967).
V.B. Compton, E. Corenzwit, J.P. Maita, B.T. Matthias, and F.J. Morin, Phys. Rev. 123, 1567 (1961).
A.L. Giorgi and E.G. Szklarz, J. Less Common Metals 20, 173 (1970).
D.O. Van Ostenburg, D.J. Lam, M. Shimizu, and A. Katsuki, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 18, 1744 (1963).
D.O. Van Ostenburg, D.J. Lam, H.D. Trapp, and D.E. MacLeod, Phys. Rev. 128, 1550 (1962).
D.J. Lam, D.O. Van Ostenburg, and D.W. Pracht, J. Appl. Phys. 35, 976 (1964).
L.L. Isaacs and D.J. Lam, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 31, 2581 (1970).
J.C. Ho and R. Viswanathan, J. Phys. Chem Solids 30, 169 (1969).
K. Andres, E. Bucher, J.P. Maita, and R.C. Sherwood, Phys. Rev. 178, 702 (1969).
G. Riblet, Phys. Rev. B 3, 91 (1971).
G. Riblet and M.A. Jensen, Superconductivity (Proc. Intern. Conf. Science of Superconductivity, Stanford, 1969), F. Chilton, ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam (1971), p. 622.
A.B. Kaiser, J. Phys. C 3, 409 (1970).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1974 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koch, C.C., Gardner, W.E., Mortimer, M.J. (1974). The Effects of Some 3d and 4d Solutes on the Superconductivity of Technetium. In: Timmerhaus, K.D., O’Sullivan, W.J., Hammel, E.F. (eds) Low Temperature Physics-LT 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4520-6_105
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4520-6_105
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4522-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-4520-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive