Skip to main content

Recent Developments in Abortion Law

  • Chapter
Genetics and the Law II
  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

At the First Symposium on Genetics and the Law held in May 1975 there was no paper presented whose sole purpose was to discuss abortion laws. Roe v. Wade 1 and Doe v. Bolton 2 were sufficiently new so that little legislative and judicial action had been taken. Since then there has been an outpouring of both legislative and judicial activity. Legislation has, for the most part, focused on ways to limit the impact of Roe and Doee, while the judiciary has been concerned with assuring that legislation not invade the zone of privacy created by Roe, as well as by previous and subsequent cases. Legislative activity can be described as ingenious at times and lawless at other times. The tension that exists between prochoice and antichoice (or prolife/antilife or proabortion/antiabortion, depending on which side of the issue you stand) factions is amply reflected in the tension between legislatures and the courts. Individual legislators feeling the pressure from well-organized antiabortion groups may vote for legislation they do not personally believe in, or that they know will be struck down in the courts.3 The situation we find is that the prochoice viewpoint is litigated with scant private funds, while the antiabortion point of view is litigated with state funds through attorneys-general offices. Given this, the American Civil Liberties Union, Planned Parenthood, and other groups have amassed a remarkable record of successful litigation in defense of the rights of individuals to make procreative decisions without undue state interference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Notes

  1. U.S. 113 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. 179 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See the remarks of Massachusetts state senator Louis Bertonazzi in Dilemmas of Dying: Policies and Procedures for Decisons Not to Treat, G. K. Hall, Boston (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. U.S. at 160.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H.C.S. House Bill No. 1211 $2(2).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Planned Parenthood of Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. U.S. 379, 47 U.S. Law Week 4094 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pa. Stat. Ann., Tit. 35 J6605(a).

    Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. at 163.

    Google Scholar 

  10. U.S. Law Week at 4096.

    Google Scholar 

  11. U.S. Law Week at 4097.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Supra note 6 at fn. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. La. R.S. 40: 1299. 35. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fight brewing over louisiana abortion law, Medical World News, p. 42, Sept. 4 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wynn v. Scott, 449 F. Supp. 1302, 1316 (N.D. 111. 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. U.S. 132 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid, at 145.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rev. St. Ch. 38, $ 81-51 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wynn v. Carey, 582 F. 2d 1375 (7 Cir. 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  20. U.S. 438, 45 U.S. Law Week 4781 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  21. U.S. Law Week 4781 n. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Citing, Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179, 192.

    Google Scholar 

  23. U.S. 464, 45 U.S. Law Week 4787 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  24. U.S. Law Week at 4790.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Poelker v. Doe, 45 U.S. Law Week 4794 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chapter 367, J2, Item 4402-5000 of the Massachusetts Acts of 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  28. No. 78-1324 (U.S. Court of Appeals, 1st Cir. 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  29. C.F.R. J440.230(c) 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Supra note 28 at 10.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Section 209 of Pub. L. 95-205; 91 Stat. 1460 (Dec. 9, 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  32. House Rule XXI (2).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zbaraz v. Quern, Cir. No. 77C 4522 (N.D. 111. May 15, 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  34. But see Woe v. Califano, 460 F. Supp. 234 (S.D. Ohio 1978), holding an earlier and more restrictive version of the Hyde Amendment to the constitutional. The short opinion appears to base its holding on lack of violation of due process, and does not discuss the equal protection issue.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Supra note 28 at 21.

    Google Scholar 

  36. La. R.S. 14:88.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Preterm, Inc. v. MBTA, Civ. No. 74-159-M (D.C. Mass. 1974), discussed in Fam. Plann./Popul. Rep. 3:76 (August, 1974 ).

    Google Scholar 

  38. U.S. 748 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  39. U.S. 678 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  40. New York Education Law $6811(8).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Framingham Clinic v. Bd. of Selectmen of Southborough, 367 N.E. 2d 606 (Mass., 1977); and see Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. Citizens for Community Action, 538 F.2d 861 (8th Cir. 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  42. West Side Women’s Serv. v. City of Cleveland, 450 F. Supp. 796.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Planned Parenthood v. Danforth, supra note 6.

    Google Scholar 

  44. See Freiman v. Ashcroft, 584 F.2d 247 (8th Cir. 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  45. La. R.S. 40:1299.35.17 ($1000 per year for each facility plus an additional fee of $500 per year for each physician who performs abortions).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glantz, L.H. (1980). Recent Developments in Abortion Law. In: Milunsky, A., Annas, G.J. (eds) Genetics and the Law II. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3078-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3078-3_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3080-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3078-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics