Skip to main content

Molecular and Cellular Aspects of the Interaction of Benzimidazole Carbamate Pesticides with Microtubules

  • Chapter
The Cytoskeleton

Abstract

For about twenty years, benzimidazole drugs have enjoyed wide commercial applications as systemic fungicides, as broad spectrum anthelmintics against cestode and nematode infections, and as antitumoral agents. The range of benzimidazole derivatives that became available was limited only by the resources of the drug firms, and the skill of the organic chemists. The effectiveness of these drugs is well established: they have performed well in field and clinical trials, and are commercially successful. However, it is only recently, and certainly within the last ten years that the mechanism of their action has been studied in any systematic way. Basic science is now catching up to commercial pragmatism!!

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, C., Newsam, R. J. and Gull, K., 1980, Influence of the anti-microtubule agent, mebendazole, on the secretory activity of intestinal cells of Ascaridia galli, Protoplasma, 105: 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burland, T. G. and Gull, K., 1984, Molecular and cellular aspects of the interaction of benzimidazole fungicides with tubulin and microtubules, in: “Mode of Action of Antifungal Agents,” A.P.J. Trinci and J.P. Ryley Teds.), British Mycological Symposium, pp. 299–320, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burland, T. G., Schedl, T., Gull, K. and Dove, W. E., 1984, Genetic analysis of resistance to benzimidazoles in Physarum: differential expression of 8-tubulin genes, Genetics, 108: 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabral, F., Sobel, M. E. and Gottesman, M. M., 1980, CHO mutants resistant to colchicine, colcemid, or griseofulvin have an altered B-tubulin, Cell, 20: 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappucinelli, P., Fighetti, M. and Rubino, S., 1979, Amitotic inhibitor for chromosomal studies in slime molds, FEMS Microbiol Letters, 5: 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, L., Quinlan, R. A., Roobol, A., Pogson, C. I. and Gull, K., 1980, A comparison of tubulins from mammalian brain and Physarum polycephalum using SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and peptide mapping, FEBS Lett., 115: 301–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, A. C., 1970, Benlate-induced instability of Aspergillus diploids, Nature, 266: 771–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoebeke, J., Van Nijen, G. and DeBrabander, M., 1976, Tnteraction of oncadazole (R17934), a new anti-tumoral drug, with rat brain tubulin, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 69: 319–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. J. and Aist, J. R., 19/7, Effects of MBC on hyphal tip organisation growth and mitosis of Fusarium acuminatum, and their antagonism by D20, Protoplasma, 92: 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, C. M., Clayton, L. Gutteridge, W. E., Pogson, C. I. and Gull, K., 1982, Identification and drug binding capabilities of tubulin in the nematode Ascaridia galli, Molec. Biochem. Parasitol., 6: 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilmartin, J. Y., 1981, PurificationlvF yeast tubulin by self-assembly in vitro, Biochemistry 20: 3629–3633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mareel, M., Storme, G., Debrijyne, G. and Van Cauwenberge, R., 1980, Anti-invasive effect of microtubule inhibitors in vitro, in: “Microtubules and Microtubule Inhibitors 1980,”H.UeSrabander and J. DeMey (eds.), pp. 534–544, Elsevier North-Holland, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, N. R., 1980, The genetics of microtubule polymerization and the mechanism of action of antimicrotubule drugs in Aspergillus nidulans, in: “Microtubules and Microtubule Inhibitors 1980,” M. DeBrabander and TT DeMey (eds.), pp. 511–521, Elsevier North-Holland, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styles, J. A. and Garner, R., 1974, Benzimidazole carbamate methyl ester- evaluation of effects in vivo and in vitro, Mutation Res., 26: 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, E. D. and Chavarria, A. P., 19/4, In vivo effects of a new anthelmintic, mebendazole (R-17635), on the eggs of Trichuris trichiura and hookworm, Ann. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.,, 23:151–159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Byard, E.H., Gull, K. (1986). Molecular and Cellular Aspects of the Interaction of Benzimidazole Carbamate Pesticides with Microtubules. In: Clarkson, T.W., Sager, P.R., Syversen, T.L.M. (eds) The Cytoskeleton. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2161-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2161-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9274-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2161-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics