Skip to main content

Interior—Point Algorithms for Dantzig and Wolfe Decomposition Principle

  • Chapter
Advances in Convex Analysis and Global Optimization

Part of the book series: Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications ((NOIA,volume 54))

  • 666 Accesses

Abstract

We present algorithms to solve the problems originated from the application of the Dantzig and Wolfe decomposition principle to linear programming problems. One algorithm requires the sub-problems (slaves) completely solved at each iteration and the other uses sub-optimal solutions. All algorithms partially solve the master problem at each iteration. Also, we present a two-cut approach to save the excessive computation time in the restarting phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, D. S. and Vaidya, P. (1995). A cutting plane algorithm for convex programming that uses analytic centers. Mathematical Programming, (69):1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bahn, O., Merle O. du, Goffin, J. L., and Vial, J. P. (1995). A cutting plane method from analytic centers for stochastic programming. Mathematical Programming, (69):45–73.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dantzig, G. B. and Wolfe, P. (1960). The decomposition algorithm for linear programs. Operations Research, (8):101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dantzig, G. B. and Ye, Y. (1990). A build-up interior method for linear programming: affine scaling form. Technical Report Sol 90–4, Dept. of Operations Research, Stanford, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Den Hertog, D. (1992). Interior point approach to linear, quadratic and convex programming: algorithms and complexity. PhD thesis, University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Den Hertog, D., Roos, C., and Terlaky, T. (1992). A build-up variant of the path following method for 1p. Operations Research Letters, (12):181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feijoo, B., Sanchez, A., and Gonzaga, C. C. (1997). Maintaining closedness to the analytic center of a polytope by perturbing added hyperplanes. Applied Mathematics and Optimization,2(35):139–144.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Goffin, J. L.,, Gondzio, J., R., S., and Vial, J. P. (1994). Solving nonlinear multicommodity flow problems by the analytic center cutting plane method. Technical Report LOGILAB 1994. 21, GERARD, Faculty of management, McGill University.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goffin, J. L., Haurie, A., and Vial, J. P. (1992). Decomposition and nondifferentiable optimization with the projective algorithm. Management Science, (38):284–302.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goffin, J. L. and Vial, J. P. (1990). Cutting planes and column generation techniques with projective algorithm. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, (65):409–429.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coffin, J. L. and Vial, J. P. (1997). A two-cut approach in the analytic center cutting plane method. Technical Report LOGILAB 97–20, Department of Management Studies, University of Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goffin, J. L. and Vial, J. P. (1998). Multiple cuts in the analytic center method. Working Paper Logilab 98. 10, Department of Management Studies, University of Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huard, P. (1967). Resolution of mathematical programming problems with nonlinear constraints by the method of centres. In Abadie, J., editor, NonLinear Programming,pages 207–21. North Holland Publishing Co. and Amsterdan.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kelley, J. E. (1960). The cutting plane method for solving convex programming. J. Soc. Indus. Appl. Math., VIII (4): 703–712.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kiwel, K. C. (1996). Complexity of some cutting plane methods that use analytic centers. Mathematical Programming, (74):47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mitchell, J. E. (1988). Karmakar“s algorithm and combinatorial optimization problems. PhD thesis, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nesterov, Y. (1995). Complexity estimates of some cutting plane methods based on analytic barrier. Mathematical Programming, (69):149–176.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oliveira, P. R. and Santos, M. A. d. (2000). Using analytic center and cutting planes methods for nonsmooth convex programming. In Nguyen, V., Strodiot, J., and Tossings, P., editors, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems-Optimization,number 481, pages 339–356. Springer-Verlag Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roos, C. and Vial, J.-P. (1988). Analytic centers in linear programming. Report. 88–68, Delft University of Technology. Delft, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Santos, M. A. d., Lemos, A., and Oliveira, P. R. (2000). A multicut approach to the linear algebraic feasibility problem. Working paper, DCC-ICEx-UFMG, Belo Horizonte/MG, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Santos, M. A. d. and Oliveira, P. R. (2000). Interior-point algorithms in decomposition schemes. Working paper, DCC-ICExUFMG, Belo Horizonte/MG,Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sapatnekar, S. S., Rao, V. B., and Vaidya, P. M. (1991). A convex optimization approach to transistor sizing for cmos circuits. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Aided Design, pages 482–485, Los Alamitos, CA. IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sonnevend, G. (1985). An analytical centre for polyhedrons and new classes of global algorithms for linear (smooth, convex) programming. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, (84):866–876.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tone, K. (1991). An active-set strategy in interior point methods for linear programming. Working paper, Graduate school, Saita University, Urawa, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ye, Y. (1992). A potential reduction algorithm allowing column generation. SIAM Journal of Optimization, (2):7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ye, Y. (1997). Complexity analysis of the analytic center cutting plane method that uses multiple cuts. Mathematical Programming, (78):85–104.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

dos Santos, M.A., Oliveira, P.R. (2001). Interior—Point Algorithms for Dantzig and Wolfe Decomposition Principle. In: Hadjisavvas, N., Pardalos, P.M. (eds) Advances in Convex Analysis and Global Optimization. Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol 54. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0279-7_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0279-7_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6942-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0279-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics