Abstract
In the evolution of the epidemiological profile of present day communities, the phenomena of “chronicity” and “disability” are more and more important. These phenomena find a natural place for their manifestation and for the research of their solution in the family context. The health of some members, in a family context, proves to be an experience which affects the whole family unit and the more the condition of the individual is one of suffering, the greater the hardship the family finds itself having to face. We can therefore talk of “family hardship” as the adverse condition, perceived by the family in various ways, which directly (e.g. due to the sudden onset of critical events) and/or indirectly (due to structural conditions of the family or the context of family life) prevents the carrying out of the functions necessary for the optimal achievement of expected objectives such as a better quality of life (Bolzan, M., 2002; Pless, I. B., 1984). However, an initial definition of family hardship stands on the three-dimensional level of: i) main family functions; ii) resources the family have at their disposal for the reaching of their own objectives; iii) the system of institutions and services in which the policies and interventions on health and care operate. On this level all the exchanges of relationships — between people united by a history of behaviours and by a dominant culture in which the social unity is linked to other social unities — commonly known as the “social network”, are activated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernardo, J. M., Smith, A. F. M. (1994), Bayesian Theory, Wiley and Sons, New York.
Binda, W. (1994), La famiglia come risorsa nella salute e nella malattia. In L’arco di Giano, rivista di medical humanities, 5, Angeli, Mi.
Bolzan, M., Frigo, A. C., Fabbris, M. L., Rausa, G. (1998), Qualità espressa dai pazienti sui servizi igienici ospedalieri in Italia. In L’Igiene Moderna, 109: 681–690.
Bolzan, M. (2001), Nuove misure del disagio familiare e di accesso ai servizi socio-sanitari per condizione di salute. In LA SALUTE IN FAMIGLIA. Per un sistema statistico Informativo in grado di valutare la salute nella famiglia, Atti del Convegno (a cura di M. Bolzan), Padova 6 Aprile: 113–126.
Bolzan, M. (2002), Le famiglie valutano l’accessibilità ai servizi socio-sanitari. Risultati di un’analisi in Italia e nel Triveneto, Argomenti 4: 101–118.
Buntine, W. (1991), Theory refinement on Bayesian networks. In Proceedings of Seventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles, CA. Morgan Kaufmann.
Bragatta, G., Arcaleni, E, (2000) La tipologia familiare per nuclei e per generazioni. In SIS, Atti dalla XL Riunione Scientifica, Firenze 26–28 Aprile 2000.
Chickering, D. (1996), Learning equivalence classes of Bayesian network structures. In Proceedings of Twelth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Portland, OR. Morgan Kaufmann.
Cioni, E. (1997), Il sistema di parentela. In Lo stato delle famiglie in Italia, Barbagli M., Saraceno C. (a cura di), il Mulino, Bologna.
Cooper, G., Herskovits, E. (1992), A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data, Machine learning, 9: 309–347.
De Finetti, B. (1937), La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. In Ann. Inst. N. Poincaré, 7:1–68 (trad. In ( 1964 ) Studies in Subjective Probability. Kyburg, H. E., Smokier, H. E., Wiley, New York)
Deming, W. E., (1982), Out of the crisis, Cambridge Univ. Press.
Donabedian, A., (1980), Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. In The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment, Vol. 1, Ann Arbor, Michigan, University of Michigan
Donabedian, A., (1988), The quality of care. How can it be assessed?, Jama
Donati, P., (1991), Famiglia, servizi e reti informali in Italia. In La famiglia nella società relazionale: nuove reti e nuove regole, Ed. F. Angeli, Milano.
Eurostat, (1999), European Community Household Panel: selected indicators from the 1995 wave, Eurostat, Luxemburg.
Good, I., (1965), The Estimation of Probability, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Facchini, C., (1997), Gli anziani e la solidarietä tra le generazioni. In Lo stato delle famiglie in Italia, Barbagli, M., Saraceno, C., (a cura di), il Mulino, Bologna.
Heckerman, D., Geiger, D., Chickering, D. (1995), Learning Bayesian Networks: The combination of knowledge and statistical data, Machine Learning, 20: 197–243.
Heckerman, D., Meek, C., Cooper, G., (1997), A Bayesian Approach to Causal Discovery. Technical report, Technical report MSR-TR-97–05, Microsoft Research.
Heckerman, D., (1995), A Bayesian Approach to learning Causal Networks. Technical report, Technical report MSR-TR-95–04, Microsoft Research.
Heckerman, D., (1998), A tutorial on learning with Bayesian networks. In M.I. Jordan (ed): Learning in Graphical models, Dordrecht, Netherlands, Kluwer.
Jensen, F. V., (1996), An Introduction to Bayesian Networks, London, UK: University College London Press.
Istat (1994b), Condizioni di salute e ricorso ai servizi sanitari. Collana indagine multiscopo sulle famiglie. 10, Roma.
Istat (2000a), Rapporto annuale. La situazione del Paese nel 1999. Istat, Roma
Istat(2000b), Le strutture familiari. Indagine Multiscopo sulle famiglie “Famiglie, soggetti sociali e condizioni dell’infanzia”. 1998, Istat, Roma.
Madigan, D., Garvin, J., Raftery, A., (1995), Eliciting prior information to enhance the predictive performance of Bayesian graphical models. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 24: 2271–2292.
Øvretveit, J., (1992), Health service quality. Blackwell Scientific Pubblication.
Pearl, J., (1988), Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent System: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
Pearl, J, Verma, T., (1990), Equivalence and synthesis of causal models. In Proceedings of Sixth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Boston, MA, Morgan Kaufmann
Pless, I. B., (1984), The family as a resource unit in health care: changing patterns. In Soc. Sci. Med. 19, 4: 385–389.
Ross, C. K., Steward, C. A., Sinacore, J. M., (1983), The importance of patient preference in the measurement of the health care satisfaction, In Medical care, 31–12
Ramoni, M., Sebastiani, P., (1999), Bayesian Methods for Intelligent Data Analysis. In M. Berthold and D.J. Hand (eds): Intelligent Data Analysis: An Introduction, Springer, New York, NY.
Saraceno, C., (1998), Mutamenti della famiglia e politiche sociali in Italia, Il Mulino, Bologna.
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Lauritzen, S. L., (1990), Sequential updating of Conditional Probabilities on Directed Graphical Structures, In Network, 20: 579–605
Spirits, P., Meek, C., (1995), Learning Bayesian networks with discrete variables from data. In Proceedings of First International Conference on Knowledge and Data Mining. Montreal, QU, Morgan Kaufmann.
Ware, J. E., (1978), A taxonomy of patient satisfaction. In Health and Medical Care Service Review, 1: 2–15
Ware, J. E, (1981), How to survey patient satisfaction. In Drug International and Clinical Pharmacy, 15: 892–899.
Ware, J. E., Hays, R. D., (1988), Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters, In Medical care, 26–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brogini, A., Bolzan, M., Slanzi, D. (2004). Identifying a Bayesian Network for the Problem “Hospital and Families: The Analysis of Patient Satisfaction with Their Stay in Hospital”. In: Di Bacco, M., D’Amore, G., Scalfari, F. (eds) Applied Bayesian Statistical Studies in Biology and Medicine. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0217-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0217-9_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7946-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0217-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive