Skip to main content

Informed Consent and Alzheimer Disease Research: Institutional Review Board Policies and Practices

  • Chapter
Alzheimer Disease

Part of the book series: Advances in Alzheimer Disease Therapy ((AADT))

  • 330 Accesses

Abstract

It is the nature of Alzheimer Disease (AD) that patients will suffer impaired memory, failure of the ability to reason, and loss of competency (Marson et al., 1994). Thus the question of whether or not AD patients may grant informed consent to participation in dementia research is a compelling consideration for clinical investigators as well as Institutional Review Boards (IRBs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • High DM, Whitehouse PJ, Post SG and Berg L (1994): Guidelines for addressing ethical and legal issues in Alzheimer Disease research. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 8 (Supp. 4):66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapp MB (1994): Proxy decision making in Alzheimer Disease research: durable powers of attorney, guardianship, and other alternatives. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 8 (Supp. 4):28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marson DC, Ingram KK, Cody HA and Harrell LE (1995): Assessing the competency of patients with Alzheimer’s Disease under different legal standards: a prototype instrument. Arch Neurol 52:949.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marson DC, Schmitt FA, Ingram KK and Harrell LE (1994): Determining the competency of Alzheimer patients to consent to treatment and research. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 8 (Supp. 4):5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore DL (1994): An IRB member’s perspective on access to innovative therapy. Albany L Rev 57:559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popp AJ and Moore DL (1994): Institutional review board evaluation of neuroscience protocols involving human subjects. Surg Neurol 41:162.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Resau LS (1995): Obtaining informed consent in Alzheimer’s research. J Neuroscience Nursing 27(1):57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs GA (1994): Advance consent for dementia research. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 8 (Supp. 4):19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs GA, Stocking CB, Stern R, Cox DM, Hougham G and Sachs RS (1994): Ethical aspects of dementia research: informed consent and proxy consent. Clinical Research 42:403.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

LeBlang, T.R., Kirchner, J.L. (1997). Informed Consent and Alzheimer Disease Research: Institutional Review Board Policies and Practices. In: Becker, R.E., Giacobini, E., Barton, J.M., Brown, M. (eds) Alzheimer Disease. Advances in Alzheimer Disease Therapy. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4116-4_81

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4116-4_81

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Boston

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8660-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4116-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics