Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Progress in Mathematics ((PM,volume 161))

  • 631 Accesses

Abstract

We define a ‘unity’ as a preordered set with a certain separation property, imitating the preorder induced on the irreducible elements of a finite lattice. As proved in [C], any finite lattice L has a representation L2 I as the set of all maps from an appropriate preordered structure I, which we call the negation of the unity of irreducibles of L, into a small unity that we call 2. In this paper, we characterize unities of irreducibles of lattices, show how arbitrary unities can be constructed from such unities of irreducibles, and discuss possible definitions of maps between unities. In this way we lay some groundwork necessary for a categorical study of unities, of the negation operator, and of functors between the category u of unities, the category P of partially ordered sets, and the category L of lattices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Banaschewski and G. Bruns, Categorical characterization of the MacNeille completion, Arch. Math 18 (1967), 369–377.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Henry Crapo, Unities and Negation: representation of finite lattices, J. of Pure and Applied Algebra 23 (1982), 109–135.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Brian A. Davey and H. Werner, Dualities and equivalences: for varieties of algebras La Trobe University, Pure Maths Res Paper 81–1, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brian A. Davey and Dwight Duffus, Exponentiation and Duality, La Trobe University, Pure Maths Res Paper 81–12, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. William Lawvere, Continuously variable sets: Algebraic Geometry = Geometric Logic, in Logic Colloquium ‘73, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975, pages 135–156.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. George Markowsky, The factorization and representation of distributive lattices, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (1972), 507–530.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Priestley, Ordered topological spaces and representation of lattices, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (1975), 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. H. Stone, Topological characterization of distributive lattices and Brouwerian logics, Casopis Pest. Math. Fys. 67 (1937), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alisdair Urquhart, A topological representation for lattices, Algebra Universalis 8 (1978), 45–58.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Birkhäuser

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crapo, H., Le Conte de Poly-Barbut, C. (1998). Unities and Negation. In: Sagan, B.E., Stanley, R.P. (eds) Mathematical Essays in honor of Gian-Carlo Rota. Progress in Mathematics, vol 161. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4108-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4108-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Boston

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8656-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4108-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics