Skip to main content

Discovering Probabilistic Causal Relationships: A Comparison Between Two Methods

  • Conference paper
Selecting Models from Data

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 89))

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison between two different approaches to statistical causal inference, namely Glymour et al.’s approach based on constraints on correlations and Pearl and Verma’s approach based on conditional independencies. The methods differ both in the kind of constraints considered while selecting a causal model and in the way they search for the model which better fits the sample data. Some experiments show that they are complementary in several aspects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, T.W. (1958) An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Glymour, C., Schemes, R., Spirtes, R and K. Kelly (1987) Discovering Causal Structure Academic Press, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pazzani, M.J. (1990) Creating a Memory of Causal Relationships: An Integration of Explanation-Based and Empirical Methods Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pearl, J. and T.S. Verma (1991) “A theory of Inferred Causation,” in Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Second International Conference, J.A. Allen, R. Fikes, and E. Sandewall, eds., 441–452, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quinlan, J. R. (1990) “Probabilistic Decision Trees,” in Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, vol III, Y. Kodratoff and R.S. Michalski, eds., 140–152, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reichenbach, H. (1956) The Direction of Time, University of California Press, Berkley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Steels, L. (1985) “Second Generation Expert Systems,” Future Generation Computer Systems 1, 213 - 221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Suppes, P. (1970) A Probabilistic Theory of Causation North Holland, Amsterdam, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Esposito, F., Malerba, D., Semeraro, G. (1994). Discovering Probabilistic Causal Relationships: A Comparison Between Two Methods. In: Cheeseman, P., Oldford, R.W. (eds) Selecting Models from Data. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 89. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2660-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2660-4_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-94281-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2660-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics