Skip to main content

Assembling and Monitoring the Extracorporeal Circuit

  • Chapter
Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) began as a groundbreaking but unpredictable adjunct to cardiac surgery that often resulted in additional trauma to already debilitated patients. Over the last 40 years, it has evolved into an indispensable and efficient process with a reliability that often exceeds 99.9%. This remarkable evolution is evidenced by the fact that hundreds of patients can now undergo operations without major mishaps caused by CPB. In the early 1980s, at Emory University, coronary artery bypass patients with single- and double-vessel disease were reviewed, using three of the criteria from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS): age ≤65, ejection fraction > 35%, and no history of congestive heart failure. Over 1300 such patients were identified who had undergone operations in the previous 5 years. In this series of routine coronary bypass patients, only one death had occurred, a 0.07% mortality.1 This is a remarkable accomplishment for perfusion technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arcidi JM Jr, Powelson SW, King SB, et al. Trends in invasive treatment of single-vessel and double-vessel coronary disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1988; 95: 773–781.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crane TN, Keen WR Jr, Spiller CE, et al. A prebypass checklist–Why aren’t you using one? Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perf1986; 7: 98–100.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hill AG, Groom RC, Aid BF, et al. 1990 pediatric perfusion survey II: expanded multivariate data analysis. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perf 1991; 12: 96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Webster JG, ed. Medical Instrumentation Application and Design. New York: Houghton-Mifflin Co; 1978: 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Webster JG, ed. Medical Instrumentation Application and Design. New York: Houghton-Mifflin Co; 1978: 70–73.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vinansky RP, Hill AG, Groom RC, et al. Pressure measurement and safety with a self-contained device. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perf1986; 7: 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

  7. American Bentley. In–vitro, ex–vivo and in–vivo performance characteristics of the Bentley® BOS–CM40 and BOSCM50 capillary fiber membrane oxygenators. Irvine, Calif: American Bentley; 1984 (PN Q83280–184–3PG).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Justison GA, Lewis HD, Hamilton DG, et al. A comparison of a heparin-coated and a non-coated ECC arterial line blood filter. JExtracorp Tech 1986; 18: 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pfaender LM. Hemodynamics in the extracorporeal aortic cannula: review of factors affecting choice of the appropriate size. J Extracorp Tech 1981; 13: 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grover FL, Fewel JG, Ghidoni JJ, et al. Comparison of roller pump versus pressurized bag administration of potassium cardioplegia solution. Ann Thorac Surg1982; 34: 278–287.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Webster JG, ed. Medical Instrumentation Application and Design. New York: Houghton-Mifflin Co; 1978:86,93–94.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lautier A, Gaillard D, Juvin AM, et al. Monitoring of blood gases during extracorporeal circulation with an artificial lung. Int JArtif Organs1990; 13: 117–124.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Meyerhoff ME. New in vitro analytical approaches for clinical chemistry measurements in critical care. Clin Chem1990; 36: 1557–1572.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mansouri S, Mitsuhashi A. A new blood gas and electrolyte analyzer for point-of-care use. Presented at the 13th International Symposium on Methodology and Clinical Applications of Blood Gases, pH, Electrolytes and Sensor Technology; October 6–9, 1991; Hakone, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kurusz M, Conti VR, Arens JF, et al. Perfusion accident survey. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perf1986; 7: 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kurusz M, Faulkner SC. Follow-up comments from the 1985 perfusion accident survey. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perf1987; 8: 210–212.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vivian WA, Stander KH, Smith RG. An air embolism detection device for use with a non-occlusive arterial pump head. J Extracorp Tech1987; 19: 406–407.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lewis GS, Czaplicka C. In vitro comparison tests of three LV vent valves. J Extracorp Tech1990; 22: 125–131.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davis, R.B., Kauffman, J.N., Cobbs, T.L., Mick, S.L. (1995). Assembling and Monitoring the Extracorporeal Circuit. In: Mora, C.T., Guyton, R.A., Finlayson, D.C., Rigatti, R.L. (eds) Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2484-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2484-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7557-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2484-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics