Abstract
Early and accurate detection and treatment of preterm labor can prolong gestation with improved outcomes for both the infant and family. Review of the literature provided both theoretical and empirical support for research and development of an expert system to provide decision support for nurses’ assessment of preterm labor risk. Determining preterm labor risk in pregnant women and making decisions about interventions remain problematic in the clinical setting [1]. The problems related to preterm labor risk assessment include a poorly defined and complex knowledge base. The plethora of information about preterm labor risks remains disorganized and of little guidance to patients and providers of prenatal care. Review of the literature found no conceptual or theoretical models of preterm labor risk, which may account for poor reliability and validity of existing manual screening techniques [2]. Existing preterm labor risk screening instruments include factors that are not valid predictors of preterm labor and delivery risk, and fail to include factors reported in the literature that may be valid predictors of preterm labor [3,4,5]. Although existing instruments are only about 44% accurate, and are not adequately predictive of preterm delivery, current preterm labor prevention programs use these invalid, unreliable tools to intervene with pregnant women on a daily basis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Rosen M, Merkatz I, and Hill J. Caring for our future: a report of the expert panel on the content of prenatal care. Ob Gyn, 77 (5), 782 – 787, 1991
Woolery L. Knowledge Acquisition for Assessment of Preterm Labor Risk. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Kansas, 1992
Keirse M. An evaluation of formal risk scoring for preterm birth. Am J Perinat, 6 (2), 226 – 233, 1989
Alexander G, Weiss J, Hulsey T, and Papiernik E. Preterm birth prevention: an evaluation of programs in the United States. Birth, 18 (3), 160 – 169, 1991
VanDyne M and Woolery L. An Expert System for Nurses’ Preterm Labor Risk Assessment. SBIR Phase I Summary Report, 1993
Forsyth R. Machine Learning: Principles and Techniques. New York: Chapman & Hall Publishers, 1989
Woolery L, Grzymala—Busse J, Summers S, and Budihardjo A. On the use of LERS—LB knowledge acquisition for expert system development in nursing. Comput Nurs, 9 (6), 227 – 234, 1991
Holbrook R, Laros R, and Creasy R. Evaluation of a risk—scoring system for prediction of preterm labor. Am J Perinat, 6 (1), 62 – 68, 1989
Keirse M. An evaluation of formal risk scoring for preterm birth. Am J Perinat, 6 (2), 226 – 233, 1989
Lockwood C, Senyei A, Dische M, Casal D, Shah K, Thung S, Jones L, Deligdisch L, and Garite, T. Fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery. New Engl J Med, 315 (10). 669 – 674, 1991
McGregor J, French J, Richter R, Franco—Buff A, Johnson A, Hillier S, Judson F, and Todd, J. Antenatal microbiologic and maternal risk factors associated with prematurity. Am J Ob Gyn, 163 (5), 1465 – 1473, 1990
Grzymala-Busse J, Tsatsoulis C, VanDyne M, and Woolery L. Multiple articles in progress
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Woolery, L.K., VanDyne, M., Grzymala-Busse, J., Tsatsoulis, C. (1998). Machine Learning for Development of an Expert System to Support Nurses’ Assessment of Preterm Birth Risk. In: Saba, V.K., Pocklington, D.B., Miller, K.P. (eds) Nursing and Computers. Computers and Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2182-1_60
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2182-1_60
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7448-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2182-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive