Skip to main content

Machine Learning for Development of an Expert System to Support Nurses’ Assessment of Preterm Birth Risk

  • Chapter
Nursing and Computers

Part of the book series: Computers and Medicine ((C+M))

Abstract

Early and accurate detection and treatment of preterm labor can prolong gestation with improved outcomes for both the infant and family. Review of the literature provided both theoretical and empirical support for research and development of an expert system to provide decision support for nurses’ assessment of preterm labor risk. Determining preterm labor risk in pregnant women and making decisions about interventions remain problematic in the clinical setting [1]. The problems related to preterm labor risk assessment include a poorly defined and complex knowledge base. The plethora of information about preterm labor risks remains disorganized and of little guidance to patients and providers of prenatal care. Review of the literature found no conceptual or theoretical models of preterm labor risk, which may account for poor reliability and validity of existing manual screening techniques [2]. Existing preterm labor risk screening instruments include factors that are not valid predictors of preterm labor and delivery risk, and fail to include factors reported in the literature that may be valid predictors of preterm labor [3,4,5]. Although existing instruments are only about 44% accurate, and are not adequately predictive of preterm delivery, current preterm labor prevention programs use these invalid, unreliable tools to intervene with pregnant women on a daily basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rosen M, Merkatz I, and Hill J. Caring for our future: a report of the expert panel on the content of prenatal care. Ob Gyn, 77 (5), 782 – 787, 1991

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Woolery L. Knowledge Acquisition for Assessment of Preterm Labor Risk. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Kansas, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  3. Keirse M. An evaluation of formal risk scoring for preterm birth. Am J Perinat, 6 (2), 226 – 233, 1989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alexander G, Weiss J, Hulsey T, and Papiernik E. Preterm birth prevention: an evaluation of programs in the United States. Birth, 18 (3), 160 – 169, 1991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. VanDyne M and Woolery L. An Expert System for Nurses’ Preterm Labor Risk Assessment. SBIR Phase I Summary Report, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  6. Forsyth R. Machine Learning: Principles and Techniques. New York: Chapman & Hall Publishers, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  7. Woolery L, Grzymala—Busse J, Summers S, and Budihardjo A. On the use of LERS—LB knowledge acquisition for expert system development in nursing. Comput Nurs, 9 (6), 227 – 234, 1991

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Holbrook R, Laros R, and Creasy R. Evaluation of a risk—scoring system for prediction of preterm labor. Am J Perinat, 6 (1), 62 – 68, 1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Keirse M. An evaluation of formal risk scoring for preterm birth. Am J Perinat, 6 (2), 226 – 233, 1989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lockwood C, Senyei A, Dische M, Casal D, Shah K, Thung S, Jones L, Deligdisch L, and Garite, T. Fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery. New Engl J Med, 315 (10). 669 – 674, 1991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McGregor J, French J, Richter R, Franco—Buff A, Johnson A, Hillier S, Judson F, and Todd, J. Antenatal microbiologic and maternal risk factors associated with prematurity. Am J Ob Gyn, 163 (5), 1465 – 1473, 1990

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grzymala-Busse J, Tsatsoulis C, VanDyne M, and Woolery L. Multiple articles in progress

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woolery, L.K., VanDyne, M., Grzymala-Busse, J., Tsatsoulis, C. (1998). Machine Learning for Development of an Expert System to Support Nurses’ Assessment of Preterm Birth Risk. In: Saba, V.K., Pocklington, D.B., Miller, K.P. (eds) Nursing and Computers. Computers and Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2182-1_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2182-1_60

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7448-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2182-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics