Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prognostic Factors of Distal Tubal Occlusion

  • Chapter
Pelvic Surgery

  • 92 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter defines the prognostic factors associated with successful tubal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swolin K. Electromicrosurgery and salpingostomy: long-term results. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975; 121: 418–419.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gomel V. Salpingostomy by microsurgery. Fertil Steril. 1978; 34: 380–385.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Winston RML. Microsurgery of the fallopian tube: from fantasy to reality. Fertil Steril. 1980; 46: 521–530.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gomel V. Salpingostomy by laparoscopy. J Reprod Med. 1977; 18: 265–267.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Daniell JF, Herbert CM. Laparoscopic salpingostomy utilizing the CO2 laser. Fertil Steril. 1984; 41: 558–563.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Donnez J, Nisolle M, Casanas-Roux F. CO2 laser laparoscopy in infertile women with adnexal adhesions and women with tubal occlusion. J Gynecol Surg. 1989; 5: 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubuisson JB, de Jolinière JB, Aubriot FX, Darai E, Foulot H, Mandelbrot L. Terminal tuboplasties by laparoscopy: 65 consecutive cases. Fertil Steril. 1990; 54: 401–403.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mettler LR, Irani S, Kapamadzija A, Semm K. Pelviscopic tubal surgery: the acceptable vogue. Hum Reprod. 1990; 5: 971–974.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Canis M, Mage G, Pouly JL, Manhes H, Wattiez A, Bruhat MA. Laparoscopie distal tuboplasties: reports of 87 cases and a 4-year experience. Fertil Steril. 1991; 56: 616–621.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Donnez J. La trompe de Fallope: Histophysiologie Normale et Pathologique. Louvain, France: Université Catholique de Louvain; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Afzelius BA, Camner P, Mossberg B. On the function of the cilia in the female reproductive tract. Fertil Steril. 1978; 29: 72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Donnez J, Caprasse J, Casanas-Roux F, Ferin J, Thomas K. Loss of adrenergic innervation in rabbit induced hydrosalpinx. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1986; 21: 213–216.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. No Spécial Congrès Vichy-IFFS 1995, References en Gynecologie Obstetrique. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gomel V, Taylor PJ. In vitro fertilization versus reconstructive tubal surgery. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1992; 9: 306–309.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gomel V, Yarali H. Infertility surgery: microsurgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 4: 390–399.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Donnez J, Casanas-Roux F. Prognostic factors of fimbrial microsurgery. Fertil Steril. 1986; 46: 200–204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Singhal V, Li TC, Cooke ID. An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of 232 consecutive tubal microsurgery cases. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991; 98: 628–636.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. American Fertility Society. The American Fertility Society Classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian abnormalities and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988; 49: 944–955.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vasquez G, Boeckx W, Brosens I. Prospective study of tubal mucosal lesions and fertility in hydrosalpinges. Hum Reprod. 1995; 10: 1075–1078.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mage G, Pouly JL, Bouquet de Jolinière J, Chabran S, Riouallon A, Bruhat MA. A preoperative classification to predict the intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates after distal microsurgery. Fertil Steril. 1986; 46: 807–810.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Atri M, Tran CN, Bret PM, Aldis AE, Kintzen GM. Accuracy of endovaginal sonography for the detection of fallopian tube blockage. J Ultrasound Med. 1994; 13: 429–434.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schlief R, Deichert U. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography of the uterus and fallopian tube: results of a clinical trial of a new contrast medium in 120 patients. Radiology. 1991; 178: 213–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Peters AJ, Coulam CB. Hysterosalpingography with color Doppler ultrasonography. Am JObstet Gynecol. 1991; 164: 1530–1534.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stern J, Peters AJ, Coulam CB. Color Doppler ultrasonography assessment of tubal patency: a comparison study with traditional techniques. Fertil Steril. 1992; 58: 897–900.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kerin J, Daykhovsky L, Grundfest W, Surrey E. Falloposcopy. A microendoscopic transvaginal technique for diagnosing and treating endotubal disease incorporating guide wire cannulation and direct balloon tuboplasty. JReprod Med. 1990; 35: 606–612.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dunphy BC. Office falloposcopic assessment in proximal tubal occlusive disease. Fertil Steril. 1994; 61: 168–170.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kerin JF, Williams DB, San Roman GA, Pearlstone AC, Grundfest WS, Surrey ES. Falloposcopic classification and treatment of fallopian tube lumen disease. Fertil Steril. 1992; 57: 731–741.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cornier E, Feintuch MJ, Bouccara L. Ampullafibrotuboscopy. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1985; 14: 459–466.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brosens IA, Boeckx W, Delattin P, Puttemans P, Vasquez G. Salpingoscopy: a new preoperative diagnostic tool in tubal infertility. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987; 94: 768–773.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Schlaff WD, Hassiakos DK, Damewood MD, Rock JA. Neosalpingostomy for distal tubal obstruction: prognostic factors and impact of surgical technique. Fertil Steril. 1990; 54 (6): 984–990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Boer-Meisel ME, Te Velde ER, Habbema JDF, Kardaum JWPF. Predicting the pregnancy outcome in patients treated for hydrosalpinx: a prospective study. Fertil Steril. 1986; 45: 23–29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dubuisson JB, Chapron C, Morice P, Aubriot FX, Foulot H, Bouquet de Jolinière J. Laparoscopic salpingostomy: fertility results according to the tubal mucosal appearance. Hum Reprod. 1996; 9: 334–339.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Marana R, Muscatello P, Muzii L, Vanzetto M, Dell’Acqua S, Mancuso S. Perlaparoscopic salpingoscopy in the evaluation of the tubal factor in infertile women. Int J Fertil. 1990; 35: 211–214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Herschlag A, Seifer DB, Carcangiu ML, Patton DL, Diamond MD, DeCherney AH. Salpingoscopy: light microscopic and electron microscopic correlations. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77: 399–405.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Donnez J, Nisolle M, Casanas-Roux F, Anaf V, Bassil S. CO2 laser laparoscopie surgery: adhesiolysis, salpingostomy and fimbrioplasty. In: Donnez J, Nisolle M, eds. Atlas of Laser Operative Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy. Fort Myers, FL: Parthenon; 1994; 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  36. De Bruyne F, Puttemans P, Boeckx W, Brossens I. The clinical value of salpingoscopy in tubal infertility. Fertil Steril. 1989; 51: 339–340.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Marana R, Muzii L, Rizzi M, Luciano A, Dell’Acqua S, Mancuso S. Salpingoscopy in patients with contralateral ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1991; 55: 838–840.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Brosens IA, Vasquez G. Fimbrial microbiopsy. J Reprod Med. 1976; 16: 171.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. No Spécial Congrès Vichy-IFFS 1995, References en Gynecologie Obstetrique. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Strandell A, Waldenstrom U, Nilsson L, Hamberger L. Hydrosalpinx reduces in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod. 1994; 9: 861–863.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Dubuisson JB, Aubriot FX, Mathieu L, Foulot H, Mandelbrot L, Bouquet de Jolinière JB. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in 556 pregnancies after in vitro fertilization: implications for preventive management. Fertil Steril. 1991; 56 (4): 686–690.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Laatikainen TJ, Tenhumen AK, Venesmaa PK, Apter DL. Factors influencing the success of microsurgery for distal tubal occlusion. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1988; 243: 101–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Dlugi AM, Reddy S, Saleh WA, Mersol-Barg MS, Jacobsen G. Pregnancy rates after operative endoscopic treatment of total (neosalpingostomy) or near total (salpingostomy) distal tubal occlusion. Fertil Steril. 1994; 62: 913–920.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Donnez J. CO2 laser laparoscopy in infertile women with endometriosis and women with adnexal adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1987; 48: 390.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Nezhat F, Winer WK, Nezhat C. Fimbrioscopy and salpingoscopy in patients with minimal to moderate pelvic endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 75: 15–17.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. No Spécial Congrès Vichy-IFFS 1995, References en Gynecologie Obstetrique. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Jacques Donnez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roland Polet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michele Nisolle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Livingston Laboratories, University of Southern California, 90033, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Gere S. diZerega M.D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Donnez, J., Polet, R., Nisolle, M. (1997). Prognostic Factors of Distal Tubal Occlusion. In: diZerega, G.S., et al. Pelvic Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1864-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1864-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7316-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1864-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation