Abstract
Threshold and suprathreshold vision. The human luminance spatial frequency contrast sensitivity function (CSF) has been well studied using psychophysical measurements by detecting spatial frequency (SF) grating patterns at threshold [1], [2]. Threshold CSFs at different eccentricities have proven to be quite useful in both basic and clinical vision research. However, near threshold, the CSF is measured at a linear area of the saturating contrast-response curve. In contrast, most of our everyday vision may be at suprathreshold levels, and thus may function most of the time at the nonlinear area of the contrast-response curve. Furthermore, since the CSF is measured near threshold, it is quite possible that only the most sensitive retinal or LGN cells may contribute to the measured CSF. Since the M (magnocellular) cells in retina and LGN are about 10 times more sensitive than the P (parvocellular) cells at low to medium spatial frequencies [3], [4], the measured threshold CSF may reflect more M cell contributions. There have been recent attempts to measure suprathreshold contrast responses using contrast matching techniques [5], [6], [7]. These results show that the contrast response functions at suprathreshold levels are flatter than CSF curves measured at threshold. However, whether the results from contrast matching reflect the spatial frequency tuning functions at suprathreshold for human vision is still unclear since contrast matching is quite different from threshold measurements [4].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rovamo, J., Virsu, V. and Nasanen, R. Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision. Nature, 1978, 271:54–56.
Kelly, D.H. Retinal inhomogeneity. I. Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1984, Al:107–113.
Kaplan, E. and Shapley, R.M. The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1986, 83:2755–2757.
De Valois, R. and De Valois, K. Spatial Vision. Oxford Univ. Press, 1988.
Georgeson, M.A., and Sullivan, G.D. Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. J. Physiol., 1975, 252:627–656.
Bowker, D.O. Suprathreshold spatiotemporal response characteristics of the human visual system. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1983, 73:436–440.
Davis, E.T. Modeling shifts in perceived spatial frequency between the fovea and the periphery. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1990, A7:286–296.
Sclar, G., Maunsell, J.H.R. and Lennie, P. Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey. Vision Res., 1990, 30:1–10.
Regan, D. Human Brain Electrophysiology-Evoked Potential and Evoked Magnetic Fields in Science and Medicine. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., 1989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chen, HW., Aine, C.J., Flynn, E.R., Wood, C.C. (2000). Spatial Frequency tuning functions and Contrast Sensitivity at Different Eccentricities in the Visual Field. In: Aine, C.J., Stroink, G., Wood, C.C., Okada, Y., Swithenby, S.J. (eds) Biomag 96. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1260-7_177
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1260-7_177
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7066-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1260-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive