Skip to main content

Learning by Doing and Technology Sharing in Asymmetric Duopolies

  • Conference paper
Advances in Dynamic Games and Applications

Part of the book series: Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games ((AISDG,volume 1))

Abstract

The existence of an experience curve for the firm has theoretical foundation in Arrow’s pioneering work (Arrow, 1962). The study of the learning-curve effect was initiated, however, almost thirty years earlier by Wright (1936). It was further developed by Alchian (1959), Hirschleifer (1962), Hirschmann (1964), and by an important work by the Boston Consulting Group (1972). The learning-curve phenomenon appears to be related, in the first place, to the introduction of new products. It has been observed that a doubling in accumulated production of a new product can result in a decline of unit costs by a factor of 10 to 50 percent of their initial level (Teng and Thompson, 1983). Empirical documentation concerning the learning curve can be found in several papers that appeared in the period from the early sixties to more recent years (e.g., Lundberg, 1961; Alchian, 1963; Hollander 1965; Zimmerman, 1982; Lieberman, 1984; Alder and Clark, 1991). This literature considers cost reduction as an outcome of experience and cumulative output is the variable commonly chosen to represent that experience. The revival of interest in the study of the learning curve can be attributed to some important recent contributions that suggest the existence of a link between learning by firms and incremental innovations in both production processes and products (see in particular Rosenberg, 1976; Nelson and Winter, 1982).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adler, P.S. and K.B. Clark, 1991, Behind the learning curve: a sketch of the learning process, Management Science, 37, 264–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alchian, A., 1959, Costs and output, in: M. Abramovitz ed. The Allocation of Economic Resources (Stanford University Press, Stanford).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alchian, A., 1963, Reliability of progress curves in airframe production, Econometrica, 31, 679–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Allen, R.C., 1983, Collective invention, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 4, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arrow, K., 1962, The economic implications of learning by doing, The Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baumol, W.J., 1987, On formal dynamics: from Lundberg to chaos analysis, in: Jonung, L. ed. The Stockholm School of Economics Revisited (Cambridge University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baumol, W.J., 1992, Horizontal collusion and innovation, The Economic Journal, 102, 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dasgupta, P. and J. Stiglitz, 1988, Learning-by-doing, market structure and industrial and trade policies, Oxford Economic Papers, 40, 246–269.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Filar, J.A. and B. Tolwinski, 1990, On the Algorithm of Pollatschek and Avi-Itzhak, in: T.E.S. Raghavan, T.S. Ferguson, and O.J. Vrieze, eds., Stochastic Games and Related Topics (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman, J.W., 1991, Game Theory with Applications to Economics, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole, 1983, Learning-by-doing and market performance, Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 522–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole, 1986, Dynamic Models of Oligopoly (Harwood, Chur, Switzerland).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hirschleifer, J., 1962, The firm’s cost functions -A successful reconstruction, Journal of Business, 35, 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirschmann, W.P., 1964, Profit from the learning curve, Harvard Business Review, 42, 826–836.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hollander, S., 1965, The Sources of Increased Efficiency: A Study of Du Pont Rayon Plants (MIT Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lieberman, M.B., 1984, The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries, Rand Journal of Economics, 15(2), 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lundberg, E., 1961, Produktivitet och Rantabilitet (P.A. Norstedt and Soner, Stockholm).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nelson, R. and S. Winter, 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenberg, N., 1976, Perspectives on Technology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Scherer, F., 1980, Industrial Market Structure and Market Performance, 2nd ed. (Rand McNally, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Spence, A.M., 1981, The learning curve and competition, Bell Journal of Economics, 12, 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stokey, L.S., 1986, The dynamics of industrywide learning, in: W.P. Heller, R.M. Starr and D.A. Starrett eds., Equilibrium Analysis: Essays in Honour of Kenneth J. Arrow, vol. II (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Teng, J.T. and G.L. Thompson, 1983, Oligopoly models for optimal advertising when production costs obey a learning curve, Management Science, 29, 1087–1101.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. The Boston Consulting Group, 1972, Perspectives on Experience, The Boston Consulting Group, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tolwinski, B., 1989, Newton-type methods for stochastic games, in: T. Basar and P. Bernhard, eds., Differential Games and Applications Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wright, T.P., 1936, Factors affecting the cost of airplanes, Journal of Aeronautical Sciences, 3, 122–128.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zimmerman, MB., 1982, Learning effects and the commercialization of new energy technologies: the case of nuclear power, Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Petit, M.L., Tolwinski, B. (1994). Learning by Doing and Technology Sharing in Asymmetric Duopolies. In: Başar, T., Haurie, A. (eds) Advances in Dynamic Games and Applications. Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games, vol 1. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0245-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0245-5_23

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6679-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0245-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics