Abstract
This paper proposes a methodology to evaluate organizational performance. Developed system defines workers, facilities, activity models and production strategy. Evaluation of organizational performance is done through the following processes: (1) create the enterprise model and strategy, (2) calculate work plan by optimizing the weights of each strategy, (3) compare the basic scenario to the scenario when a situation changes. The system proposes a work plan by genetic algorithm. The plan minimizes the total cost in doing the work activities considering the weight of each production strategy. The proposed methodology is applied to some sample scenarios in a fabrication shop. Results show that the methodology can evaluate organizational performance successfully by analyzing the work plan. In addition, the methodology also evaluates the effect of improving organization and sudden trouble quantitatively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Evans JR, Dean JW, Jr. (2002) Total quality management, organization, and strategy. 3rd ed. South-Western College Pub.
Hattan M, Ichikawa K, Kokubun M (1994) Task-oriented QC application case stories: new challenges for the QC circle. Tokyo: JUSE Press, Ltd.
Komiya K (2008) the training course for the business people to elaborate the solving capability. Discover Twenty-One.
Suzuki Y, Jin Y, Koyama H, Kang G (2010) An Application of Simulation Based Process Design”, Proceedings of 17th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering, September 8-12, 2010, Krakow, Poland.
IBM, ‘FileNet Business Process Manager’, http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/content-management/filenet-business-process-manager/simulator.html.
Luh P B, Liu F, and Moser B, (1999) Scheduling of design projects with uncertain number of iterations,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 575-592, Mar, 1999.
Levitt R E, Thomsen J, Christiansen T R et al (1999), Simulating project work processes and organizations: Toward a micro-contingency theory of organizational design, Management Science, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1479-1495, Nov, 1999.
Yamato H, Hiekata K, Mitsuyuki T (2009) A Study on Evaluation and Improvement of Organizational Performance in Fabrication Shops,” International Conference on Computer Applications in Shipbuilding.
Sadowski D, Bapat V (1999) ‘THE ARENA PRODUCT FAMILY: ENTERPRISE MODELING SOLUTIONS’, Proceedings of the I999 Winter Simulation Conference, p159-p166,
Hiekata K, Yamato H, Oishi W, Sasaki Y, Sato K (2007) A Knowledge Management Framework for Marine Propeller Design’, International Conference on Computer Applications in Shipbuilding,
BPMN ver1.0, 2004. http://www.diveintobpm.org/
Blackstone, J.H., Phillips, D.T. and Hogg, G.L. (1982) A state-of-the-art survey of dispatching rules for manufacturing job shop operations,” International Journal of Production Research, 20(1), 27-45, 1982
Hartmann S (1998) A competitive genetic algorithm for resource-constrained project scheduling, Naval Research Logistics, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 733-750
Kolisch R, and Hartmann S (2006) Experimental investigation of heuristics for resource-constrained project scheduling: An update, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 23-37.
Merkle D, Middendorf M, Schmeck H, (2002) Ant colony optimization for resource-constrained project scheduling,” Ieee Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 333-346, Aug.
Bean.J.C (1994) Genetics and random keys for sequencing and optimization, ORSA Journal on Computing, 6, p154-160,
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mitsuyuki, T., Hieketa, K., Yamato, H., Haijima, K. (2013). A Study on Evaluation of Organizational Performance Considering the Workers and Facilities. In: Stjepandić, J., Rock, G., Bil, C. (eds) Concurrent Engineering Approaches for Sustainable Product Development in a Multi-Disciplinary Environment. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4426-7_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4426-7_46
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4425-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4426-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)