Abstract
The USA has accumulated a great deal of nuclear and chemical wastes as a result of the production of nuclear weapons and nuclear power. An unambiguous path to managing these legacy wastes, which continue to increase, has been blocked by science and engineering uncertainties, nuclear proliferation concerns, high costs, and compounded by the absence of a comprehensive national government policy framework and a clear public consensus about the issues. The public hears inconsistent and often contradictory messages from advocacy groups and the media, as well as from senior government elected officials and staff who have the responsibility to manage the wastes. In order to understand public preferences and perceptions about new nuclear missions at existing major DOE sites and public preferences for alternative electric energy fuel sources, CRESP surveyed US residents, disproportionately near six major DOE sites, in 2005, 2008, 2009, and 2010. In 2011, after the Fukushima events, another survey was conducted to determine the impacts of the Japanese events on the preferences and perceptions observed in the four earlier surveys.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ball M (2008) Clinton declares yucca mountain “will be off the table forever”. Las Vegas Rev J. http://www.lvrj.com/news/13860977.html. Accessed February 10, 2012
Belsey J (2008) Media exposure and core values. J Mass Commun Quart 85:311–330
Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future (2012) Final Commission Report. January 26
Caputo A (1996) A failed experiment. The environmental forum, January/February, 17–21.
Cawley K (2010) The federal government’s responsibilities and liabilities under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. Testimony for the Committee on the Budget US House of Representatives. July 27, 2010
Clinton WJ (2011) Back to work: why we need smart government for a strong economy. Alfred A Knopf, NY
Committee on Commerce, U.S. House of representatives (2000) Incinerating cash. U.S. Washington, DC, House of representatives
CNS News (2011) president Obama defends the use of nuclear energy after Fukushima. March 16, 2011. Cnsnews.com/news/article/presdeint-Obama-defends-nculear-ernergy. Accessed February 10, 2012
Deutsch J, Forsberg C, Kadak A, Kazimi M, Moniz E, Parsons J, Yangbo D, Pierpont L (2009) Update of the MIT 2003 future of nuclear power. MIT energy initiative
Domenici P (2009) Former Senator Pete Domenic delivers speech on future of global nuclear energy. http://crespupdates.blogspot.com. Accessed December 2, 2009
General Accounting Office (2001) Fundamental reassessment needed to address major mission, structure, and accountability problems. GAO-02-51. Washington DC, GAO
Gertner J (2006) Atomic balm? The New York Times Magazine. July 16, 56–64.
Graetz M (2011) The end of energy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Graetz M, Shapiro I (2005) Death by a thousand cuts: the fight over taxiing inherited wealth. Princeton University Press
Greenberg M (2009) NIMBY, CLAMP and the location of new nuclear-related facilities: U.S. National and Eleven Site-Specific Surveys. Risk Analysis, An International Journal 29:1242–1254
Greenberg M, Krueckeberg D, Kaltman M (1984) Population trends around nuclear power plants, pp 189–211. In: Pasqualetti M, Pijawka K (eds) Nuclear power: assessing and managing hazardous technology. Westview, Boulder, Colorado
Greenberg M, Krueckeberg D, Kaltman M, Metz W, Wilhelm C (1986) Local planning v. national policy: urban growth near nuclear power stations in the United States. Town Plan Rev 57:225–238
Greenberg M, Lewis D, Frisch M, Lowrie K, Mayer H (2002) The US Department of Energy’s regional economic legacy: spatial dimensions of a half century of dependency. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 36:109–125
Greenberg M, Miller KT, Frisch M, Lewis D (2003) Facing an uncertain economic future: environmental management spending and rural regions surrounding the U.S. DOE’s nuclear weapons facilities. Def Peace Econ 14:85–97
Greenberg M, West B, Lowrie K, Mayer H (2009) The Reporter’s handbook on nuclear materials, energy, and waste management. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, TN
Huizenga D (2012) WM symposia 2012 and FY 2013 budget overview. Paper copy received March 15, 2012
Inhofe J, et al. (2009) Letter to secretary Steven Chu, April 29. 202009.
Jenkins-Smith H, Silva C (1998) The role of risk perception and technical information in scientific debates over nuclear waste storage. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 59:107–122
Keller B (2002) Nuclear nightmares, New York Times. May 26, 22–29, 51, 54–55, 57.
Lindell M, Earle T (1983) How close is close enough: public perceptions of the risk of industrial facilities. Risk Analysis 3:245–253
MIT (2003) The future of nuclear power. Boston, MA, MIT. http://web.mit.edu/nuclearpower. Accessed January 15, 2004
MSNBC (2010) Obama renews commitment to nuclear energy. February 16, 2000 and http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35421517/ns/business-oil_and_energy.
NJ DEP news (2011) Christie Administration Challenges Rule on Nuclear Waste. http://www.nj.gov/dep/docs/nrcmotion20110315.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2011
Northey H (2011) Lawmakers bitterly divided over Jaczko’s future. http://www.eenews.net/public/EEDaily/2011/12/12. Accessed December 12, 2011
Nuclear Energy Institute (2002) President Bush OKs recommendation of York account mountain as disposal site for nuclear material. http://www.nei.org/newsandevents/bushokasrecomemndation. Accessed February 10, 2012
Nuclear Energy Institute (2003) Nuclear power plants vital element in President Bush’s greenhouse gas reduction initiative. http://www.nei.org/newsandevents/nuclearbush/initiative. Accessed February 10, 2012
Office of Environmental Management, DOE (1995) Closing the circle on the splitting of the atom. DOE, Washington, DC
Office of Environmental Management, DOE (1996) Estimating the cold war mortgage: the 1996 baseline environmental management report, 1996, DOE/EM-0290. DOE, Washington, DC
Pegg J (2005) Bush calls for development of more nuclear power. http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/apr2005/2005-04-28-10.asp. Accessed February 10, 2012
Pinto J (ed) (1998) The project management handbook. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Probst K, Lowe A (2000) Cleaning up the nuclear weapons complex: does anybody care? Center for risk management, resources for the future, Washington DC
Russell M (1997) Toward a productive divorce: separating DOE cleanups from transition assistance. Joint Institute for Energy and Environment, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Shanahan J (1995) Television viewing and adolescent authoritarianism. J Adolesc 18:271–288
Shrum L (2001) Mainstreaming, residents, and impersonal impact: testing moderators of the cultivation affects for estimates of crime risk. Hum Commun Res 27:187–215
Spangler M (1981) The role of syndrome management and the future of nuclear energy. Risk Analysis 1:179–188
Stewart R, Stewart J (2011) Fuel cycle to nowhere: U.S. law and policy on nuclear waste. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville TN
Top-to-Bottom Review Team (2002) A review of the environmental management program.
US DOE (2006) Accelerating cleanup: Focus on 2006. Washington, DC
US Department of Energy. Department of energy releases (2001) Strategic plan (2011) May 10, 2011. http://energy.gove/articles/department-energy-releaes-2011-stratgegci-plan. Accessed may 12, 20111
Von Hippel F, ed. (2010) The uncertain future of nuclear energy. International panel of fissile materials, Research Report Number 9. http://www.fissilematerials.org Accessed October 9, 2010
Wagner R, Arthur E, Cunningham P (1999) Plutonium, nuclear power, and nuclear weapons. Issue Sci Technol. Spring, 29–33
Wallenstein P, Lynn Yang J (2011) Obama support for nuclear power faces a test. Washington Post. March 18, 2011. http://www.Washngtonpost.com/politics/obmasas-support-for-nculear-power. Accessed February 10, 2012
Wilkinson H (2006) Schmidt considers nuke waste. The Enquirer. http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dII/article?AID=/20061029. Accessed November 1, 2006
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greenberg, M.R. (2013). Managing the Nuclear Legacies. In: Nuclear Waste Management, Nuclear Power, and Energy Choices. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 2. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4231-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4231-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4230-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4231-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)