Abstract
Background: Videoconference technology has substantially improved making surgical telementoring more feasible. However, evidence of potential benefits is missing.
Objective: To present evidence of benefits and highlight major barriers, as well as reporting own experience.
Methods: A systematic review was performed; studies were classified as technology-driven, clinical, or educational.
Results: Three hundred and ninety-two surgical procedures were performed by 179 surgeons in 11 surgical specialties. The most common telementored procedure was laparoscopic cholecystectomy (56 cases, 14%), endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysm (48 cases, 12%), and laparoscopic colectomy (24 cases, 6%). One hundred and eleven (27%) cases had a laparoscopic approach; 6 cases (5%) were converted to open surgery. Ten complications (2%) were reported (liver bleeding, trocar port bleeding, bile collection, postoperative ileus, wound infection, serosal tears, iliac artery rupture). Seven surveys (27%) focus on education of surgeons; all these report improved surgical performance. Sixty-three medical students, 48 general surgeons, and 24 surgical residents participated. Telementoring was combined with simulator training in two cases and robotics in three cases. Thirteen surveys (50%) were cross institutional and 7 surveys (27%) were intercountry or intercontinental. Perceived usefulness of surgical telementoring was high among 83% of surgeons; however, only 5 (19%) surveys had a systematic evaluation of surgeon’s technology satisfaction.
Conclusion: There is an acceptable rate of conversion and complications. Surgical telementoring is commonly used for education of surgeons and has huge potential to offer patients the best expertise despite long distances.
*Knut Magne Augestad, M.D. (Norwegian Center for Telemedicine and Integrated Care, University Hospital North Norway, Tromsø, Norway), Taridzo Chomutare, M.Sc. (Norwegian Center for Telemedicine and Integrated Care and Tromsø Telemedicine Labaratory, University Hospital North Norway, Tromsø, Norway), Johan Gustav Bellika M.Sc., Ph.D. (Medical Informatics and Telemedicine Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway), Rolf Ole Lindsetmo M.D., MPH, Ph.D. (Professor and Chief, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital North Norway, Tromsø, Norway), Gunnar Hartvigsen Ph.D. (Professor, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, University of Tromsø, Norway), Per Hasvold M.Sc. (Research Fellow, Norwegian Centre for Telemedicine and Integrated Care, Tromsø, Norway), Richard Wootton D.Sc., Ph.D. (Editor in Chief Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare and Head of Research Norwegian Centre for Telemedicine and Integrated Care, Tromsø, Norway), Stig Muller M.D., Ph.D. (Consultant, Department of Surgery, University Hospital North Norway, Tromsø; Norway), Hiten Patel BMSc.Hons, BM, BCh, MRCS, PhD, FRCS (Urol), FRCS (Eng). (Professor of Surgery & Urology, University of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway), Conor Delaney M.D., Ph.D. (Professor of Surgical Education and Chief Division of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA), Alexander Horsch Ph.D. (Professor Institute for Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Technology, Munich, Germany), Ole Edvard Gabrielsen M.D. (Consultant, Department of Surgery, Narvik Local Hospital, University Hospital North Norway), Kim Mortensen M.D., Ph.D. (Consultant, Department of Surgery, University Hospital North Norway, Tromsø Norway), Sture Pettersen M.Sc. (Head Tromsø Telemedicine Laboratory, Norwegian Centre for Telemedicine and Integrated Care, Tromsø, Norway)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aucar JA, Doarn CR, Sargsyan A, Samuelson DA, Odonnell MJ, DeBakey ME. Use of the Internet for long-term clinical follow-up. Telemed J. 1998;4(4):371–4.
DeBakey ME. Telemedicine has now come of age. Telemed J. 1995;1(1):3–4.
Merrell RC, Doarn CR. In Memoriam Michael E. DeBakey, MD. 1908–2008. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14(6):503–4.
Jarvis-Selinger S, Chan E, Payne R, Plohman K, Ho K. Clinical telehealth across the disciplines: lessons learned. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14(7):720–5.
Doarn CR. The power of video conferencing in surgical practice and education. World J Surg. 2009;33(7):1366–7.
Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Ni M, Darzi AW, Hanna GB. Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2010;252(6):943–51.
Doarn CR. Telemedicine in tomorrow’s operating room: a natural fit. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2003;10(3):121–6.
Rothenberg SS, Yoder S, Kay S, Ponsky T. Initial experience with surgical telementoring in pediatric laparoscopic surgery using remote presence technology. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19 Suppl 1:S219–22.
Damore LJ, Johnson JA, Dixon RS, Iverson MA, Ellison EC, Melvin WS. Transmission of live laparoscopic surgery over the Internet2. Am J Surg. 1999;178(5):415–7.
Matsumoto E, Lee L, Warren J, Caumartin Y, Shetty A, Touma N, et al. Long-distance tele-mentoring: prospective trial in training laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2009;181(4, Supplement 1):822–3.
Agarwal R, Levinson AW, Allaf M, Markov D, Nason A, Su LM. The RoboConsultant: telementoring and remote presence in the operating room during minimally invasive urologic surgeries using a novel mobile robotic interface. Urology. 2007;70(5):970–4.
Anvari M. Telesurgery: remote knowledge translation in clinical surgery. World J Surg. 2007;31(8):1545–50.
Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(10):1389–402.
Augestad KM, Lindsetmo RO. Overcoming distance: video-conferencing as a clinical and educational tool among surgeons. World J Surg. 2009;33(7):1356–65.
Merrell RC, Doarn CR. Is it time for a telemedicine breakthrough? Telemed J E Health. 2008;14(6):505–6.
Lim EC, Seet RC. In-house medical education: redefining tele-education. Teach Learn Med. 2008;20(2):193–5.
Dickson-Witmer D, Petrelli NJ, Witmer DR, England M, Witkin G, Manzone T, et al. A statewide community cancer center videoconferencing program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(11):3058–64.
Wood D. No surgeon should operate alone: how telementoring could change operations. Telemed J E Health. 2011;17(3):150–2.
Friedman CP. Where’s the science in medical informatics? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1995;2(1):65–7.
Vuolio S, Winblad I, Ohinmaa A, Haukipuro K. Videoconferencing for orthopaedic outpatients: one-year follow-up. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9(1):8–11.
Wallace P, Haines A, Harrison R, Barber J, Thompson S, Jacklin P, et al. Joint teleconsultations (virtual outreach) versus standard outpatient appointments for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9322):1961–8.
Ohinmaa A, Vuolio S, Haukipuro K, Winblad I. A cost-minimization analysis of orthopaedic consultations using videoconferencing in comparison with conventional consulting. J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8(5):283–9.
Camara JG, Zabala RR, Henson RD, Senft SH. Teleophthalmology: the use of real-time telementoring to remove an orbital tumor. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(8):1468–71.
Schulam PG, Docimo SG, Saleh W, Breitenbach C, Moore RG, Kavoussi L. Telesurgical mentoring. Initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(10):1001–5.
Rosser JC, Wood M, Payne JH, Fullum TM, Lisehora GB, Rosser LE, et al. Telementoring. A practical option in surgical training. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(8):852–5.
Augestad KM, Chomutare T, Bellika G, Patel HRH, Lindsetmo RO, Delaney CP, Mobile Medical Mentor Group (M3). Education of Surgeons and Risk of Complications During Surgical Telemetoring. Surgical Innovation 2011.
Rodas EB, Latifi R, Cone S, Broderick TJ, Doarn CR, Merrell RC. Telesurgical presence and consultation for open surgery. Arch Surg. 2002;137(12):1360–3; discussion 1363.
Bauer J. International surgical telementoring using a robotic arm: our experience. Telemed J. 2000;6(1):25–31.
Bruschi M, Micali S, Porpiglia F, Celia A, De Stefani S, Grande M, et al. Laparoscopic telementored adrenalectomy: the Italian experience. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(6):836–40.
Byrne JP, Mughal MM. Telementoring as an adjunct to training and competence-based assessment in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2000;14(12):1159–61.
Challacombe B, Kandaswamy R, Dasgupta P, Mamode N. Telementoring facilitates independent hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Transplant Proc. 2005;37(2):613–6.
Ereso AQ, Garcia P, Tseng E, Gauger G, Kim H, Dua MM, et al. Live transference of surgical subspecialty skills using telerobotic proctoring to remote general surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(3):400–11.
Ewers R, Schicho K, Wagner A, Undt G, Seemann R, Figl M, et al. Seven years of clinical experience with teleconsultation in craniomaxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(10):1447–54.
Gambadauro P, Magos A. NEST (network enhanced surgical training): a PC-based system for telementoring in gynaecological surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;139(2):222–5.
Gandsas A, McIntire K, Montgomery K, Bumgardner C, Rice L. The personal digital assistant (PDA) as a tool for telementoring endoscopic procedures. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;98:99–103.
Mendez I, Hill R, Clarke D, Kolyvas G. Robotic long-distance telementoring in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(3):434–40; discussion 434–40.
Rodrigues Netto Jr N, Mitre AI, Lima SV, Fugita OE, Lima ML, Stoianovici D, et al. Telementoring between Brazil and the United States: initial experience. J Endourol. 2003;17(4):217–20.
Panait L, Rafiq A, Tomulescu V, Boanca C, Popescu I, Carbonell A, et al. Telementoring versus on-site mentoring in virtual reality-based surgical training. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(1):113–8.
Rafiq A, Moore JA, Zhao X, Doarn CR, Merrell RC. Digital video capture and synchronous consultation in open surgery. Ann Surg. 2004;239(4):567–73.
Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC. Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(2):217–22.
Sawyer MA, Lim RB, Wong SY, Cirangle PT, Birkmire-Peters D. Telementored laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000;70:302–8.
Schlachta CM, Lefebvre KL, Sorsdahl AK, Jayaraman S. Mentoring and telementoring leads to effective incorporation of laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(4):841–4.
Schlachta CM, Sorsdahl AK, Lefebvre KL, McCune ML, Jayaraman S. A model for longitudinal mentoring and telementoring of laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(7):1634–8.
Sebajang H, Trudeau P, Dougall A, Hegge S, McKinley C, Anvari M. Telementoring: an important enabling tool for the community surgeon. Surg Innov. 2005;12(4):327–31.
Sebajang H, Trudeau P, Dougall A, Hegge S, McKinley C, Anvari M. The role of telementoring and telerobotic assistance in the provision of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in rural areas. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(9):1389–93.
Schneider A, Wilhelm D, Doll D, Rauschenbach U, Finkenzeller M, Wirnhier H, et al. Wireless live streaming video of surgical operations: an evaluation of communication quality. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(8):391–6.
Sereno S, Mutter D, Dallemagne B, Smith CD, Marescaux J. Telementoring for minimally invasive surgical training by wireless robot. Surg Innov. 2007;14(3):184–91.
Snyder CW, Vandromme MJ, Tyra SL, Hawn MT. Proficiency-based laparoscopic and endoscopic training with virtual reality simulators: a comparison of proctored and independent approaches. J Surg Educ. 2009;66(4):201–7.
Tamariz F, Merrell R, Popescu I, Onisor D, Flerov Y, Boanca C, et al. Design and implementation of a web-based system for intraoperative consultation. World J Surg. 2009;33(3):448–54.
Di Valentino M, Alerci M, Bogen M, Tutta P, Sartori F, Marty B, et al. Telementoring during endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a prospective study. J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12(2):200–5.
Parker A, Rubinfeld I, Azuh O, Blyden D, Falvo A, Horst M, et al. What ring tone should be used for patient safety? Early results with a Blackberry-based telementoring safety solution. Am J Surg. 2010;199(3):336–40; discussion 340–1.
Seemann R, Guevara G, Undt G, Ewers R, Schicho K. Clinical evaluation of tele-endoscopy using UMTS cellphones. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(11):2855–9.
Bauer JJ, Lee BR, Stoianovici D, Bishoff JT, O’Kelley S, Cadeddu JA, et al. Remote Telesurgical Mentoring: Feasibility and Efficacy. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-Volume 5—Volume 5: IEEE Computer Society, 2000.
Etzioni DA, Finlayson SR, Ricketts TC, Lynge DC, Dimick JB. Getting the science right on the surgeon workforce issue. Arch Surg. 2011;146(4):381–4.
Etzioni DA, Liu JH, O’Connell JB, Maggard MA, Ko CY. Elderly patients in surgical workloads: a population-based analysis. Am Surg. 2003;69(11):961–5.
Etzioni DA, Liu JH, Maggard MA, Ko CY. The aging population and its impact on the surgery workforce. Ann Surg. 2003;238(2):170–7.
Williams Jr TE, Satiani B, Thomas A, Ellison EC. The impending shortage and the estimated cost of training the future surgical workforce. Ann Surg. 2009;250(4):590–7.
Demartines N, Mutter D, Marescaux J, Harder F. Preliminary assessment of the value and effect of expert consultation in telemedicine. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190(4):466–70.
Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Fallowfield L. Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(11):935–43.
Demartines N, Mutter D, Vix M, Leroy J, Glatz D, Rosel F, et al. Assessment of telemedicine in surgical education and patient care. Ann Surg. 2000;231(2):282–91.
Demartines N, Otto U, Mutter D, Labler L, von Weymarn A, Vix M, et al. An evaluation of telemedicine in surgery: telediagnosis compared with direct diagnosis. Arch Surg. 2000;135(7):849–53.
Holland AJ, Soundappan SV, Oldmeadow W. Videoconferencing surgical tutorials: bridging the gap. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78(4):297–301.
Hadley GP, Mars M. Postgraduate medical education in paediatric surgery: videoconferencing – a possible solution for Africa? Pediatr Surg Int. 2008;24(2):223–6.
Stain SC, Mitchell M, Belue R, Mosley V, Wherry S, Adams CZ, et al. Objective assessment of videoconferenced lectures in a surgical clerkship. Am J Surg. 2005;189(1):81–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Augestad, K.M. et al. (2012). Clinical and Educational Benefits of Surgical Telementoring. In: Patel, H., Joseph, J. (eds) Simulation Training in Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2930-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2930-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2929-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2930-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)