Skip to main content

Hybrid Rocket Engines

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Powered Flight

Abstract

The hybrid rocket engine utilizes a combination of solid rocket and liquid rocket technology to meet some flight mission applications. In terms of performance, cost, availability of materials and safety, the hybrid approach does potentially have some advantages. A number of design issues are covered in this chapter, including the implications of solid fuel regression rate and stoichiometric length on engine performance. Modeling of solid fuel surface regression as a function of mass flux is presented. The framework for steady and nonsteady internal ballistic analysis is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Trumpour AP, Greatrix DR, Karpynczyk J, Cherrington W (2010) Preliminary design of a university laboratory hybrid rocket engine. Can Aeronaut Space J 56:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chiaverini MJ (2007) Review of solid-fuel regression rate behavior in classical and nonclassical hybrid rocket motors. In: Chiaverini MJ, Kuo KK (eds) Fundamentals of hybrid rocket combustion and propulsion. AIAA, Reston (Virginia)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Greatrix DR, Gottlieb JJ (1987) Erosive burning model for composite-propellant rocket motors with large length-to-diameter ratios. Can Aeronaut Space J 33:133–142

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greatrix DR (2009) Regression rate estimation for standard-flow hybrid rocket engines. Aerosp Sci Technol 13:358–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sutton GP, Biblarz O (2001) Rocket propulsionRocket propulsion elements, 7th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karabeyoglu MA, Ziliac G, Cantwell BJ, De Zilwa S, Castelluci, P (2003) Scale-up tests of high regression rate liquefying hybrid rocket fuels.In: Proceedings of 41st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno (Nevada), January 6–9

    Google Scholar 

  7. Altman D, Humble RW (1995) Hybrid rocket propulsion systems. In: Humble RW, Henry GN, Larson WJ (eds) Space propulsion analysis and design. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Greatrix DR, Gottlieb JJ, Constantinou T (1987) Quasi-steady analysis of the internal ballistics of solid-propellant rocket motors. Can Aeronaut Space J 33:61–70

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karabeyoglu MA, De Zilwa S, Cantwell BJ, Zilliac G (2005) Modeling of hybrid rocket low frequency instabilities. J Propul Power 21:1107–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greatrix, D.R. (2012). Hybrid Rocket Engines. In: Powered Flight. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2485-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2485-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2484-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2485-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics