Abstract
The authors discuss two ethical problems encountered by applicants when applying for dermatology residency using the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). In the first scenario, a dermatology applicant is being pressured by a program director to reveal how she plans to rank individual programs. How should she respond? The authors discuss the NRMP’s communication policy and conclude that there is no ethically satisfying way to answer a program director’s questions about rank lists. The authors suggest that a change of NRMP policy to limit the communications that occur between applicants and program directors after the interview is the best way to combat this type of pressure. In the second scenario, a dermatology applicant is being asked about her marriage and her intention to have children during an interview for dermatology residency. The authors discuss what kinds of questions regarding marriage and family can and cannot be asked by interviewers according to federal statutes. They discuss ways an applicant could reply to the program director in this situation. The authors draw from classical medical ethics, the law, and their own experience researching the integrity of the dermatology match in order to discuss these two scenarios.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sbicca JA, Gorell ES, Kanzler MH, Lane AT. The integrity of the dermatology National Resident Matching Program: results of a national study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63(4):594–601.
Teichman JMH, Anderson KD, Dorough MM, et al. The urology residency matching program in practice. J Urol. 2000;163:1878–87. Reproduction with permission from the publisher.
National Resident Matching Program. Charting outcomes in the match. Characteristics of applicants who matched to their preferred specialty in the 2009 main residency match, 3rd edn. 2009. http://www.nrmp.org/data/chartingoutcomes2009v3.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2011.
Match Participation Agreement for Applicants and Programs for the 2009 Main Residency Match. 2008. http://www.nrmp.org/res_match/about-res/ensuring. Accessed 23 Oct 2011.
Abbasi K, Smith R. No more free lunches. BMJ. 2003;326:1155–6.
Anderson KD, Jacobs DM, Blue AV. Is match ethics an oxymoron? Am J Surg. 1999;177:237–9.
Miller JB, Schaad DC, Crittenden RA, Oriol NE, MacLaren C. Communication between programs and applicants during residency selection: effects of the match on medical students’ professional development. Acad Med. 2003;78:403–11.
Legal/illegal interview questions. Office of Human Resources Management. University of Albany. http://hr.albany.edu/content/legalqtn.asp. Accessed 26 Jan 2011.
Acknowledgements
We thank Lisa Martin, B.A. (Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA) for providing information about national industry hiring standards.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sbicca, J.A., Lane, A.T. (2012). Tales from the Residency Interview Trail. In: Bercovitch, L., Perlis, C. (eds) Dermatoethics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2191-6_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2191-6_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2190-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2191-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)