Abstract
In general, “marketing” of any product addresses problems of product acceptance, pricing, distribution, and advertising (Nelson 1982). Sweetness may be associated with pricing to the extent that various levels and types of sweetener affect production costs and acceptability. Sweetness can have a role in product distribution in cases where potential, geographically distinct markets showed large differences in preferred levels of product sweetness. However, the most significant incorporation of product sweetness into marketing can be broken down into (a) the use of sweetness in increasing the market of a given product without specific reference to sweetness itself (i.e., sweetness as a tool to increase product acceptance), and (b) explicit marketing of the sweetness of the product (e.g., use of sweetness of the product as an advertising element). The first is more an element of product development but some methodological similarities with marketing are noteworthy. Naturally, for a specific product both of these elements could be involved to a greater or lesser degree.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anonymous (1985) Healthy trends. Calorie Control Commentary 7(2): 3
Calorie Control Commentary (1986) Hotels catering to the calorie-conscious. Calorie Control Commentary 8(1): 5
Franta R (1985) Sugar and sweetener consumption trends and their significance. Presented at “Sugars and Other Sweeteners in Food Processing” Symposium, Michigan State University, October 1985 and excerpted in Food Technol 40(12): 116–128
Hall T (1985a) Consumers say they avoid sweet drinks, so why do they buy so many of them? Wall Street Journal, 3 July 1985, 1st page, Section 2
Hall T (1985b) What Americans eat hasn’t changed much despite healthy image. Wall Street Journal, 12 September 1985, p 1
Institute of Food Technology (1986) Sweeteners. 3. Alternatives to cane and beet sugar. Food Technol 40(12): 116–128
Kovach J (1984) The bitter truth. Industry Week Nov. 1984, p 28
Lowenberg ME, Todhunter EN, Wilson ED et al. (1979) Food and people, 3rd edn. John Wiley, New York
Mechling EW, Mechling J (1981) Sweet talk: the rhetorical drama of sugar. Culture and Communication Conference, San Diego State University
Moskowitz H (1985) Sensory preference segmentation and implications of product development. Presented at “Sugars and Other Sweeteners in Food Processing” Symposium, Michigan State University, October 1985
Nelson JE (1982) The practice of marketing research. Kent Publishing, Boston
Schutz HG (1983) Multiple regression approach to optimization. Food Technol 37(11): 46–49
Stone H, Sidel J, Lovier S, Woolsey A, Singleton R (1974) Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Technol 28: 24–34
USDA (1980) Nutrition and your health, dietary guidelines for Americans (Home and Garden Bull No. 232). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schutz, H.G., Judge, D.S. (1987). Sweetness in Marketing. In: Dobbing, J. (eds) Sweetness. ILSI Human Nutrition Reviews. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1429-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1429-1_16
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1431-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1429-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive