Skip to main content

Is the Trashcan Being Ironic? Analysing Direct Manipulation User Interfaces Using a Contemporary Theory of Metaphor

  • Conference paper
Visual Representations and Interpretations

Abstract

One approach adopted in the design of graphical user interfaces is to create icons and dialogue structures, and to consider the tasks supported by interactive systems, according to a consistent theme. By making the theme some aspect of the real world, or a task domain with which the user is assumed to be familiar, it is said that some metaphor or analogy has been adopted in the design of the user interface’s model world. It is also suggested that by adopting an analogy in the appearance and behaviour of the on-screen objects that make up the model world, users’ existing knowledge can be carried over and the novel interactive system will be easier to learn and use than if new knowledge structures have to be acquired.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Halasz F, Moran TP. Analogy Considered Harmful. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, New York, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith RB. Experiences with the Alternate Reality Kit: An Example of the Tension Between Literalism and Magic. In: Proceedings of CHI’87 Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson B, Smyth M, Knott RP, Bergan M, Bergan J, Alty JL. Minimising Conceptual Baggage: Making Choices about Metaphor. In: Cockton G, Draper SW, Weir GRS (eds) People and Computers IX. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  4. French RM. The Suability of Sameness: A Theory and Computer Model of Analogy-Making. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  5. Winograd T, Flores F. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts., 1986

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Suchman, LA. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1987S

    Google Scholar 

  7. Agre PE. Computation and Human Experience. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 1997

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Clancey WR. Situated Cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  9. Putnam H. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1981

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Lakoff G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press, London, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lakoff G, Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rohrer T. Feeling Stuck in a GUI Web: Metaphors, Image-schemas and Designing the Human Computer Interface. Available from University of Oregon WWW Site. http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~rohrer/gui4web.htm

  13. Johnson M. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily BaSsis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harnad S. The Symbol Grounding Problem. Physica D 1990; 42:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lakoff G. What is Metaphor? In: Barnden JA, Holyoak KJ (eds) Advances in Connectionist and Neural Computation Theory Volume 3 Analogy, Metaphor, and Reminding. Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  16. Benyon D, Davies G, Keller L, Preece J, Rogers Y. A Guide to Usability, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  17. Laurel B. Computers as Theater. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Treglown M. Qualitative Models of User Interfaces. In: Cockton G, Draper SW, Weir GRS (eds) People and Computers IX. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gibbs RW. Process and Products in Making Sense of Tropes. In: Ortony A (ed) Metaphor and Thought 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Treglown, M. (1999). Is the Trashcan Being Ironic? Analysing Direct Manipulation User Interfaces Using a Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In: Paton, R., Neilson, I. (eds) Visual Representations and Interpretations. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0563-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0563-3_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-082-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0563-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics