Skip to main content

Multidisciplinary Practice in Requirements Engineering: Problems and Criteria for Support

  • Conference paper
People and Computers XV—Interaction without Frontiers

Abstract

This paper is concerned with multidisciplinary practice (MDP) in the emerging field of requirements engineering (RE). It is argued that multidisciplinary requirements engineering practice is ineffective. MDP in RE is introduced, exemplified, and problems identified. The incommensurability of conflicting paradigms may be a possible underlying cause of such problems. Accommodation of alternative paradigms is discussed, and criteria for support to overcome the problems of MDP are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Austin, A. E. (1990), Discussion on Accommodation, in E. G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrel, G. & Morgan, G. (1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1981), Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley&Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, W. (1986), “Radical Developments in Accounting Thought”, Accounting Review 61(4), 601–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, D. (1990), Peering at Paradigms through the Prism of Practice Improvement, in E. G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denley, I. (1999), Dialectic Approach to Multidisciplinary Practice in Requirements Engineering, PhD thesis, University College London, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, W. (1990), Accommodation: Towards a Paradigm-Praxis Dialectic, in E. G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog, Sage Publications, pp. 105–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasson, S. (1995), User Involvement in Decision Making in Information Systems Development, in B. Dahlbom, F. Kämmerer, F. Ljundberg, J. Stage & C. Sørensen (eds.), Proceedings of IRIS 18, Gothenberg Studies in Informatics, Report 7. http://iris.informatik.gu.se/conference/iris18/iris1826.html.

  • Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989), Fourth Generation Evaluation, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994), Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research, in N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), The Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, chapter 6, pp. 105–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J., Randall, D. & Shapiro, D. (1993), “From Ethnographic Records to System Design: Some Experiences from the Field”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1(3), 123–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N. & Carter, P. (1991), “In Defence of Paradigm Incommensurability”, Organization Studies 12, 109–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchener, R. (1986), Piaget’s Theory of Knowledge, Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolution, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolution, second edition, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M. D. (1990), Emergent Paradigms: How New? How Necessary, in E. G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog, Sage Publications, pp. 167–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. (1990), The Making of a Constructivist, in E. G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog, Sage Publications, pp.67–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. & Dowell, J. (1989), Conceptions of the Discipline of HCI: Craft, Applied Science and Engineering, in A. Sutcliffe & L. Macaulay (eds.), People and Computers V (Proceedings of HCI’89), Cambridge University Press, pp.9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, L. A. (1996), Requirements Engineering, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. (1981), Implementing New Paradigm Research: A Model for Training and Practice, in P. Reason & J. Rowan (eds.), Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research, John Wiley&Sons, pp.415–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankey, H. (1994), The Incommensurability Thesis, Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaife, M., Curtis, E. & Hill, C. (1994), “Interdisciplinary Collaboration: A Case Study of Software Development for Fashion Designers”, Interacting with Computers 6(4), 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1983), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals think in Action, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrtic, T. M. (1990), Social Accommodation: Towards a Dialogical Discourse in Educational Inquiry, in E. G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog, Sage Publications, pp. 125–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville, I., Rodden, T., Sawyer, P., Bentley, R. & Twidale, M. (1993), Integrating Ethonography into the Requirements Engineering Process, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE’93), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville, I., Sawyer, P. & Viller, S. (1998), Viewpoints for Requirements Elicitation: A Practical Approach, in Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE’98), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp.74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamper, R. (1994), Social Norms in Requirements Analysis—An Outline of MEASUR, in M. Jirotka & J. Goguen (eds.), Requirements Engineering: Social and Technical Issues, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A. G. (1997), A Technique Combination Approach to Requirements Engineering, in J. Mylopoulos (ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE’97), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp.65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. & Gioia, D. (1995), “Paradigms Lost: Incommensurability vs. Structurationist Inquiry”, Organization Studies 15(4), 565–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Denley, I., Long, J. (2001). Multidisciplinary Practice in Requirements Engineering: Problems and Criteria for Support. In: Blandford, A., Vanderdonckt, J., Gray, P. (eds) People and Computers XV—Interaction without Frontiers. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0353-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0353-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-515-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0353-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics