Abstract
This research considers decision situations in which a portfolio of individuals is to be selected. Criteria relative to quality of individuals conflict with constraints on the composition of the group. This work applies to student selection problems in which the group criteria conflict with the constraints relative to the student portfolio. In this chapter, we propose an innovative methodology to support such a decision. In the first step, the Electre Tri method sorts students into ordered predefined categories according to how each student individually fulfills the selection requirements; in a second analysis, a mathematical programming formulation combines the results of the first step with the requirements on the student group to select a group of students who are individually good and satisfactory as a group. The methodology identifies a portfolio of students that is a good compromise between group constraints and the Electre Tri student classification. Although this new methodology is applied in the context of student selection, it can be applied widely in other multicriteria portfolio decision contexts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Archer N, Ghasemzadeh F (1999) An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. Int J Proj Manag 17(4):73–88
Bafail A, Moreb A (1993) Optimal allocation of students to different departments in an engineering college. Comput Ind Eng 25(1–4):295–298
Bouyssou D, Marchant T (2007a) An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, i: The case of two categories. Eur J Oper Res 178(1):217–245
Bouyssou D, Marchant T (2007b) An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, ii: More than two categories. Eur J Oper Res 178(1):246–276
Dias L, Climaco J (1999) On computing ELECTRE’s credibility indices under partial information. J Multicrit Decis Anal 8(2):74–92
Dias L, Mousseau V, Figueira J, Clímaco J (2002) An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI. Eur J Oper Res 138(2):332–348
Figueira J, Mousseau V, Roy B (2005) ELECTRE methods. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys, Springer Verlag, Boston, Dordrecht, London, pp 133–162
Ghasemzadeh F, Archer NP (2000) Project portfolio selection through decision support. Decis Support Syst 29(1):73–88
Keisler J (2008) The value of assessing weights in multi-criteria portfolio decision analysis. J Multicrit Decis Anal 15(5–6):111–123
Kuncel N, Hezlett L, Ones D (2001) Assigning students to academic majors. Psychol Bull 127(1):162–181
Leyva Lopez JC (2005) Multicriteria decision aid application to a student selection problem. Pesquisa Operacional 25(1):45–68
Liesiö J, Mild P, Salo A (2008) Robust portfolio modeling with incomplete cost information and project interdependencies. Eur J Oper Res 190(3):679–695
Miyaji I, Ohno K, Mine H (1988) Solution method for partitioning students into groups. Eur J Oper Res 33(1):82–90
Montibeller G, Franco LA, Lord E, Iglesias A (2009) Structuring resource allocation decisions: a framework for building multi-criteria portfolio models with area-grouped options. Eur J Oper Res 199(3):846–856
Mousseau V, Dias L (2004) Valued outranking relations in ELECTRE providing manageable disaggregation procedures. Eur J Oper Res 156(2):467–482
Mousseau V, Slowinski R (1998) Inferring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples. J Global Optim 12(2):157–174
Mousseau V, Slowinski R, Zielniewicz P (2000) A user-oriented implementation of the ELECTRE TRI method integrating preference elicitation support. Comput Oper Res 27(7–8):757–777
Mousseau V, Dias L, Figueira J (2003a) On the notion of category size in multiple criteria sorting models. Dimacs research report 2003-02, Rutgers Univerity
Mousseau V, Dias L, Figueira J, Gomes C, Clímaco J (2003b) Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model. Eur J Oper Res 147(1):72–93
Mousseau V, Dias L, Figueira J (2006) Dealing with inconsistent judgments in multiple criteria sorting models. QJ Oper Res 4(3):145–158
Philips L, Bana e Costa C (2007) Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing. Ann Oper Res 154:51–68
Polyashuk A (2006) Formulation of portfolio selection problem with multiple criteria. JMCDA 13(2–3):135–145
Reeves G, Hickman E (1992) Assigning MBA students to field study project teams: A multicriteria approach. Interfaces 22(5):52–58
Roy B (1991) The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory Decis 31:49–73
Saber H, Ghosh J (2001) Assigning students to academic majors. Omega 29(6):513–523
Weitz R, Jelassi M (1992) Assigning students to groups: A multi-criteria decision support system approach. Decis Sci 23(3): 746–757
Yeh H (2003) The selection of multiattribute decision making methods for scholarship student selection. Int J Sel Assess 11(4):289–296
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the editors for their fruitful comments and remarks on the initial draft, which greatly improved the final version of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cardinal, J.SL., Mousseau, V., Zheng, J. (2011). An Application of Constrained Multicriteria Sorting to Student Selection. In: Salo, A., Keisler, J., Morton, A. (eds) Portfolio Decision Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 162. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9943-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9943-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9942-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9943-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)