Skip to main content

Overview of Crimes and Antiquities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Crime in the Art and Antiquities World

Abstract

In 1987, grave robbers in Peru stole the largest gold object ever found from an ancient royal tomb in the archeological site of Sipàn (Atwood 2004). Weighing in at just under 3 pounds, the piece was a backflap, ripped off the skeletal remains from the tomb of an important warrior–priest. Ten years later, the backflap was recovered in the parking lot of a hotel in Philadelphia as part of sting operation conducted on the part of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (FBI 2009). The undercover agents had offered $1.6 million for it (Brodie et al. 2000: 15). In 1998, the backflap was finally returned to Peru and is now on display in the Museo de la Nación in Lima (Rose 1998).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    With the advent of farming, for example, empires and cities largely replaced hunter–gatherer, pastoral, and nomadic ways of life (Stille 2002: xiv).

  2. 2.

    Moreover, the tangible remains of the past as they relate to collective cultural heritage are also essential elements in the perpetuation of a thriving tourist economy. Greece, for example, is a relatively poor country that relies heavily on tourism as a source of national income.

  3. 3.

    http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/arttheft/northamerica/us/isabella/isabella.htm.

  4. 4.

    At one point, for example, there was speculation that the heist had been perpetrated by individuals with ties to local organized crime groups and even the Irish Republican Army (Boston Globe 2004). See the full article online at http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2004/03/11/new_theory_airs_on_gardner_museum_theft/.

  5. 5.

    Many libraries have fallen vict im to theft of rare books and manuscripts. See, for example. Sandra Laville’s recent article in The Guardian on William Jacques, a thief who stole £1 million worth of rare and ancient texts from the British Library. (See at http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/feb/02/antiquarian-book-theft-library-crime.)

  6. 6.

    A more expansive definition of art vandalism could also include unintentional damage caused by thieves in the course of a theft; damage to an artwork caused by a neglectful caretaker; restorative efforts that instead mutilate an artwork; and damage to artworks caused during war or civil unrest (Conklin 1994: 227–228).

  7. 7.

    For example, a lawsuit involving the seizure of Egon Schiele’s Portrait of Wally, was initially commenced by the U.S. Government in 1999, claiming that the current holding institution knew that the painting had been stolen in 1938 from a Jewish owner’s private collection (Hoffman 2006). To this day, the painting is still tied up in litigation (Artinfo 2008).

  8. 8.

    While the art fraud discussed here is, for the sake of space, limited to a cursory discussion of fakes and forgeries, a broader examination of art fraud should include fraudulent activities committed on the part of dealers, collectors, auction houses, and museums. Such examples of art fraud include but are not limited to: insurance fraud, tax fraud, and investment fraud committed on the part of collectors; fraud committed on the part of dealers against artists, other dealers, collectors, auctions houses, museums; fraud committed on the part of auction houses (e.g., insider trading, the sale of stolen or counterfeit art); fraud committed on the part of museums (e.g., purchasing stolen or looted art for a collection; customs violations). For an excellent, in-depth discussion of such fraudulent activities, we refer the reader to John Conklin’s Art Crime (Praeger Press 1994).

  9. 9.

    http://www.spurlock.uiuc.edu/explorations/research/collecting.pdf.

  10. 10.

    Provenance refers to the previous ownership history of an object. The term is most frequently used in the art community to refer, in other words, to what has happened to an antiquity since it came out of the ground.

  11. 11.

    Since property varies from one legal framework to the next, so too do legal conceptualizations of ownership. Following the Anglo–American nemo dat rule, for example, a thief can neither convey good title nor can someone claim good title through a thief even if the property is transferred to a good faith purchaser (Gerstenblith 2004). Unlike common law countries such as the USA, however, good title to a stolen object can be conveyed in the bulk of European continental civil law countries if the object was purchased in good faith. This means that even if an antiquity was looted and illegally exported from its country of origin, if it was subsequently purchased in good faith in a civil country, then the good faith purchase is favored and the object is no longer legally construed as stolen (Brodie 2002). Civil countries, then – most famously, Switzerland – become transit ports in which antiquities change hands and title is obtained. With a good title secured, an antiquity can now obtain legal export documentation, be legally imported elsewhere, and thus begin to circulate freely and legally on the antiquities market (Alder and Polk 2002, 2005).

  12. 12.

    Legislative attempts to curb antiquities trafficking have in general identified the issue as one of theft or illicit export; that is, the enactment of national laws that vest ownership over antiquities to the State, in which case the removal of such objects constitutes theft; or, laws that attempt to prohibit exportation of such objects from national borders (Alder and Polk 2002). The salient difference between these two legislative efforts concerns its enforceability – market nations who top the list of antiquities importers have been reluctant to enforce other nations’ export laws, and source nations are more successful in pursuing legal recourse when such items are legally construed as stolen (ibidem).

  13. 13.

    Another figure often attributed to INTERPOL by scholars and journalists alike is that art crime is the third highest-grossing criminal industry, just behind drugs and arms. INTERPOL, on the other hand, has carefully and explicitly stated for years on its Web site that “We do not possess any figures which would enable us to claim that trafficking in cultural property is the third or fourth most common form of trafficking, although this is frequently mentioned at international conferences and in the media” (INTERPOL 2009). We suspect that this figure gets recycled over and over simply because it is sensational, not because it is necessarily based in fact.

References

  • Alder, C., Polk, K. (2002). Stopping this awful business: the illicit traffic in antiquities examined as a criminal market. Art, Antiquity, & Law, 7(1), 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alder, C., Polk, K. (2005). The illicit traffic in plundered antiquities. In Reichel, P. (ed.), Handbook of Transnational Crime and Justice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alva, W. (2001). Destruction of the archaeological heritage of Peru. In Brodie, N., Doole, J., Renfrew, C. (eds.), Trade in Illicit Antiquities: The Destruction of the World’s Archaeological Heritage (89–96). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. (2002). The international theft and illicit export of cultural property. New England Journal of International & Comparative Law, 8(2), 1–26. http://www.nesl.edu/intljournal/vol8/anderson_v8n2.pdf. Retrieved 20 December 2007.

  • Artdaily (2007). Guennol lioness sells for $57.2 million. Artnews, December 6. http://www.artdaily.com/indexv5.asp?int_sec=11int_new=22531. Retrieved 23 January 2008.

  • Athanassopoulos, E. (2002). An “ancient” landscape: European ideals, archaeology, and nation building in early modern Greece. Journal of Modern Greek Studies, 20(2), 273–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, R. (2004). Stealing History: Tomb Raiders, Smugglers, and the Looting of the Ancient World. New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bator, P. (1982). An essay on the international trade in art. Stanford Law Review, 34(2), 275–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beech, H. (2003). Asia’s looted treasures spirited away. Time Asia, October 13. http://www.time.com/time/asia/covers/501031020/story.html. Retrieved 20 December 2007.

  • Berdal, M., Serrano, M. (2002). Introduction. In Berdal, M., Serrano, M. (eds.), Transnational Organized Crime and International Security: Business as Usual? Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlen, C. (1996). Mafia and a lost Caravaggio stun Andreotti trial. New York Times, November 8. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9507E0DA163BF93BA35752C1A960958260. Retrieved 29 January.

  • Bowman, B. A. (2008). Transnational crimes against culture: looting at archaeological sites and the gray market in antiquities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 69(11A), 4517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, N. (2002). Introduction. In Brodie, N., Tubb, K. (eds.), Illicit Antiquities: The Theft of Culture and the Extinction of Archaeology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, N. (2006). An archaeologist’s view of the trade in unprovenanced antiquities. In Hoffman, B. (ed.), Art & Cultural Heritage: Law, Policy, & Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, N., Doole, J., Watson, P. (2000). Stealing History: The Illicit Trade in Cultural Material. Cambridge: The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, J. (1988). Faced with a shrinking supply of authentic art, African dealers peddle the illusion. New York Times, April 17, H51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, H. (2005). Message to the mafia: city wants its stolen Caravaggio returned. Telegraph, November 26. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/11/27/wmafia27.xml. Retrieved 29 January 2008.

  • Conklin, J. (1994). Art Crime. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordess, C., Turcan, M. (1993). Art vandalism. British Journal of Criminology, 33, 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, A. (1991). Michelangelo’s David is damaged. New York Times, 15 September 1991, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elia, R. (2001). Analysis of the looting, selling, and collecting of Apulian red-figure vases: a quantitative approach. In Brodie, N. et al. (eds.), Trade in Illicit Antiquities: The Destruction of the World’s Archaeological Heritage. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (2009). Art theft program. http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/arttheft/arttheft.htm. Retrieved 13 November 2009.

  • Francioni, F., Lenzerini, F. (2003). The destruction of the Buddhas of Bamiyan and international law. European Journal of International Law, 14(4), 619–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francioni, F., Lenzerini, F. (2006). The obligation to prevent and avoid destruction of cultural heritage: from Bamiyan to Iraq. In Hoffman, B. (ed.), Art & Cultural Heritage: Law, Policy & Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstenblith, P. (2004). Art, Cultural Heritage, and the Law: Cases & Materials. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D., Chippindale, C. (1993). Material and intellectual consequences of esteem for Cycladic figures. American Journal of Archaeology, 97(3), 602–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, D. (1970). Pots and Robbers. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. (2006). Introduction to parts II and III: cultural rights, cultural property, and international trade. In Hoffman, B. (ed.), Art & Cultural Heritage: Law, Policy & Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • INTERPOL (2005). 2003 statistics on stolen works of art by place of theft. http://www.interpol.int/Public/WorkOfArt/woafaq.asp. Retrieved 13 December 2005.

  • INTERPOL (2009). Stolen works of art: frequently asked questions. http://www.interpol.int/Public/WorkOfArt/woafaq.asp. Retrieved 20 December 2007.

  • Isman, F. (2001). For that stolen Vermeer, follow the art squad. UNESCO Courier. http://www.unesco.org/courier/2001_04/uk/doss24.htm. Retrieved 29 January 2008.

  • Joyce, E. (1999). Transnational criminal enterprise: the European perspective. In Farer, T. (ed.), Transnational Crime in the Americas. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, S. R. M. (2005). Going, Going, Gone: Regulating the Market in Illicit Antiquities. Leicester: Institute of Art and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, P. L. (1992). International art theft and the illegal import and export of cultural property: a study of relevant values, legislation, and solutions. Suffolk Transnational Law Journal, 15, 609–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCalister, A. (2005). Organized crime and the theft of Iraqi antiquities. Trends in Organized Crime, 9(1), 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, B. (2005). Mafia informer asked to solve mystery of stolen Caravaggio. The Guardian, November 28. http://www.guardian.co.uk/italy/story/0,12576,1652146,00.html. Retrieved 29 January 2008.

  • Mueller, G. (2001). Transnational crime: definitions and concepts. Transnational Organized Crime, 4, 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. (1995). Stealing China’s past. The People’s Republic reports a hemorrhage of artefacts. Archaeology, 48(6), 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, R. (2002). Wages of Crime: Black Markets, Illegal Finance, and the Underworld Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York AFP (2007). Mesopotamian sculpture sells for record 57 million dollars. The Carved Guennol Lioness, December 5. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1935404/posts. Retrieved 15 November 2009.

  • Nicholas, L. (1995). The Rape of Europa: The Fate of Europe’s Treasures in the Third Reich and the Second World War. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, P. (1997). Trade in Antiquities: Reducing Destruction and Theft. London: Archetype Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papa Sokal, M. (2006). Antiquities Collecting and the Looting of Archaeological Sites. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Ename International Colloquium, “Who Owns the Past? Heritage Rights and Responsibilities in a Multicultural World”, held at Ghent, Belgium, 22–25 March 2006. http://www.savingantiquities.org/pdf/PapaSokal_Antiquities.pdf. Retrieved 13 March 2008.

  • Passas, N. (1998). Globalization and transnational organized crime: the effects of criminogenic asymmetries. Transnational Organized Crime, 4(3, 4), 22–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passas, N. (1999). Globalization, criminogenic asymmetries and economic crime. European Journal of Law Reform, 1(4), 399–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passas, N. (2000). Global anomie, dysnomie, and economic crime: hidden consequences of globalization and neo-liberalism in Russia and around the world. Social Justice, 27(2), 16–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passas, N. (2002). Cross-border crime and the interface between legal and illegal actors. In van Duyne, P. C. et al. (eds.), Upperworld and Underworld in Cross-Border Crime. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passas, N. (2005). Global anomie theory and crime. In Henry, S., Lanier, M. (eds.), The Essential Criminology Reader (174–182). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platthy, J. (1993). UNESCO and trafficking in illicit treasures. Journal of Prehistoric Religion, 7, 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radnoti, S. (1999). The Fake: Forgery and Its Place in Art. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2000). The Merger: The Conglomeration of International Organized Crime. Woodstock, NY: Overlook Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M. (1998). Backflap sting. Archaeology, 51(5). http://www.archaeology.org/9809/newsbriefs/backflap.html. Retrieved 13 November 2009.

  • Ruggiero, V. (1998). Transnational criminal activities: the provision of services in the dirty economies. International Journal of Risk, Security, and Crime Prevention, 3(2), 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, V. (2000). Crime and Markets: Essays in Anti-criminology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin, S. (2001). Taliban atone for delay in destroying statues. Reuters, March 19. http://hss.fullerton.edu/comparative/b%C3%A2mi%C3%A2n_buddhas_exart.htm. Retrieved 13 March 2008.

  • Stanish, C. (2006). Forging ahead. Archaeology, 62(3). http://www.archaeology.org/0905/etc/insider.html. Retrieved 15 November 2009.

  • Stille, A. (2002). The Future of the Past. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tijhuis, E. (2006). Transnational Crime and the Interface Between Legal and Illegal Factors: The Case of the Illicit Art and Antiquities Trade. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Duyne, P. C. et al. (2002) (eds.), Upperworld and Underworld in Cross-Border Crime. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. (1999). Emerging issues: transnational crime and control. In Newman, G. (ed.), Global Report on Crime and Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. (1996). Globalization, convergence, and history. Journal of Economic History, 56(2), 103–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, N. (2000). The political economy of globalization. In Woods, N. (ed.), The Political Economy of Globalization. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikos Passas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Passas, N., Proulx, B.B. (2011). Overview of Crimes and Antiquities. In: Manacorda, S., Chappell, D. (eds) Crime in the Art and Antiquities World. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7946-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics