Skip to main content

Long-Term Verifiability of Remote Electronic Elections

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical Studies in E-Government
  • 1047 Accesses

Abstract

Retention of election documents is essential for verifying the proper conduct of an election ex post. The documents retained provide for later review in case an election contest is filed. Moreover, the principle of public elections laid down in German basic law implies the need for public verifiability. This applies to remote electronic voting in particular as physical observation is not achievable in this case.

Although the retention obligations on paper-based elections are governed by electoral law, specifications for e-voting are still an open issue. We therefore address the following questions. With which existing legal obligations on retention of election data is it necessary to comply? How can they be transferred to the scenario of remote electronic elections?

We approach the issue as follows. Based on an analysis of the retention obligations specified in German electoral law, we identify the conditions that must be documented and are thus subject to long-term verifiability. Then we investigate how they can be adapted to the scenario of remote electronic elections. We also recommend how to conclusively document that these conditions have been met.

Our work contributes to establishing the basis for legally binding e-voting in Germany. As electoral law in Europe is rather consistent, this contribution might be useful to other countries as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Any laws and regulations are henceforth referred to by their official abbreviations.

  2. 2.

    For example, in the 2007 Estonian parliamentary elections, voters could change their electronic vote either by voting again electronically or by voting with a ballot paper (Riigikogu Election Act §44 (6)). English version available at http://www.iuscomp.org/gla/statutes/BWG.htm.

  3. 3.

    For example, in the 2007 Estonian parliamentary elections, voters could change their electronic vote either by voting again electronically or by voting with a ballot paper (Riigikogu Election Act §44 (6)). English version available at http://www.iuscomp.org/gla/statutes/BWG.htm.

  4. 4.

    However, the approach of using two or more separate individuals or entities operating together (commonly referred to as dual control) is an important method to enhance the security of an online voting system. It should be adhered to where appropriate, for example, when starting or closing the poll is initiated by the Electoral Board.

References

  1. Burmester, M. and Magkos, E., “Towards secure and practical e-elections in the new era”, Secure Electronic Voting, Advances in Information Security, Vol. 7, pp. 63–76, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Council of Europe, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocol No. 11, September 2003, http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/D5CC24A7-DC13-4318-B457-5C9014916D7A/0/EnglishAnglais.pdf [7 April 2009].

  3. COU05 Council of Europe. Recommendation on legal, operational and technical standards for e-voting, Rec(2004)11. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg Cedex, France, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Wahlordnung für die Wahl der Mitglieder der Fachkollegien der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), 2006, available in German only: http://www.dfg.de/forschungsfoerderung/formulare/download/70_01.pdf [7 April 2009].

  5. European Commission. Online Availability of Public Services: How Is Europe Progressing? Web Based Survey on Electronic Public Services Report of the 6th Measurement, June 2006, http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/docs/benchmarking/online_availability_2006.pdf [8 April 2009].

  6. Federal Constitutional Court. Press release no. 19/2009 of 3 March 2009, http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/pressemitteilungen/bvg09-019en.html [9 April 2009].

  7. Grimm, R., Krimmer, R., Meißner, N., Reinhard, K., Volkamer, M. and Weinand, ­ M., Security Requirements for Non-political Internet Voting, [online], Arbeitsberichte des Fachbereichs Informatik, Nr. 06/2007, Universität Koblenz-Landau, Koblenz, Germany, 2007, http://www.uni-koblenz.de/∼aggrimm/arbeitsberichte/arbeitsberichte_6_2007.pdf [10 April 2009].

  8. Kunz, T., Okunick, S. and Viebeg, U., “Long-term security for signed documents: services, protocols, and data structures”, in Schmidt, A. U., Kreutzer, M. and Accorsi, R., (Eds.), Long-term and dynamical aspects of information security: emerging trends in information and communication security, pp. 125–139, Nova Publishers, New York, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lambrinoudakis, C., Gritzalis, D., Tsoumas, V., Karyda, M. and Ikonomopoulos, S., “Secure electronic voting: the current landscape”, Secure Electronic Voting, Advances in Information Security, Vol. 7, pp. 101–124, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meißner, N., Hartmann, V. and Richter, D., “Verifiability and Other Technical Requirements for Online Voting Systems”, Electronic Voting in Europe, Lecture Notes in Informatics, Vol. 47, pp. 101–109, GI, 2004, http://www.e-voting.cc/static/evoting/files/meissner_hartmann_richter_p101-109.pdf [10 April 2009].

  11. Mitrou, L., Gritzalis, D., Katsikas, S. and Quirchmayr, G., “Electronic voting: Constitutional and legal requirements, and their technical implications”, Secure Electronic Voting, Advances in Information Security, Vol. 7, pp. 43–60, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. OSCE/ODIHR Discussion Paper in Preparation of Guidelines for the Observation of Electronic Voting, Warsaw, 24 October 2008, http://www.osce.org/documents/odihr/2008/10/34647_en.pdf [7 April 2009].

  13. Schreiber, W., Handbuch des Wahlrechts zum Deutschen Bundestag: Kommentar zum Bundeswahlgesetz, Heymann, Köln, Germany, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucie Langer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Langer, L. (2011). Long-Term Verifiability of Remote Electronic Elections. In: Assar, S., Boughzala, I., Boydens, I. (eds) Practical Studies in E-Government. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7533-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7533-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7532-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7533-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics