Abstract
The voice of watershed residents – whether in agreement or disagreement – is an essential part of the learning and negotiation process needed for internal change in beliefs and active engagement, which is the only route to sustainable adoption of appropriate conservation practices. While conflict is generally thought to be a barrier to community action, it can be used as an asset to strengthen local watershed councils and other community organizations. The underlying principle of local control and local leadership is central to leveraging conflict to achieve positive community watershed outcomes. During my 11 years as an extension community development specialist, I found that even when local leadership is inexperienced, under conditions of local control, conflict assumes a different character than when state and federal agencies attempt to drive change from the top down. In this chapter, I will discuss conflict and authority’s political dimensions, types of conflict, the importance of turmoil and conflict, and strategies to enhance the value of conflict as a community development asset. My community development work in Iowa’s Maquoketa watershed is used as a case study to illustrate these concepts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Plato. 1987. The Republic. London: Penguin.
Aristotle. 1996. The Politics and the Constitution of Athens, p. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, D. 1987. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Thought, p. 390. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Leftwich, A. 1984. What is Politics?, pp. 64–65. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Shepard, R. 1999. Making Our Nonpoint Source Pollution Education Programs Effective. Journal of Extension 37(5). (http://www.joe.org/joe/1999october/a2.html); Schilling, K. E. and C. F. Wolter. 2001. Contribution of Base Flow to Nonpoint Source Pollution Loads in an Agricultural Watershed. Groundwater 39(1):49–58.
Maquoketa Quarterly Reports. 1999. EPA Region VII Water Quality Cooperative Agreement, p. 1. Iowa State University, Ames, IA (October and December).
Christenson, J. A. and J. W. Robinson. 1989. Community Development in Perspective, p. 14. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
Zacharakis, J., L. W. Morton, and J. Rodecap. 2002. “Citizen-led Watershed Projects: Participatory Research and Environmental Adult Learning along Iowa’s Maquoketa River.” Adult Learning 13(2):19–23.
Leas, S. B. 1982. Leadership and Conflict, pp. 107–109. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.
Blackard, K. and J. W. Gibson. 2002. Capitalizing on Conflict: Strategies and Practices of Turning Conflict to Synergy in Organizations, p. ix. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
Acknowledgment
I would like to acknowledge the contributions of John Rodecap, Maquoketa Watershed Project Coordinator with Agronomy Extension, and Lois Wright Morton, Extension Sociologist, Iowa State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zacharakis, J. (2011). Turning Conflict into Citizen Participation and Power. In: Wright Morton, L., Brown, S. (eds) Pathways for Getting to Better Water Quality: The Citizen Effect. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7282-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7282-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7281-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7282-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)