Abstract
Various sensing mechanisms in nature can be described by the Weber–Fechner law stating that the response to varying stimuli is proportional to their relative rather than absolute changes. The chemotaxis of bacteria Escherichia coli is an example where such logarithmic sensing enables sensitivity over large range of concentrations. It has recently been experimentally demonstrated that under certain conditions E. coli indeed respond to relative gradients of ligands. We use numerical simulations of bacteria in food gradients to investigate the limits of validity of the logarithmic behavior. We model the chemotactic signaling pathway reactions, couple them to a multi-flagella model for propelling and take the effects of rotational diffusion into account to accurately reproduce the experimental observations of single cell swimming. Using this simulation scheme we analyze the type of response of bacteria subject to exponential ligand profiles and identify the regimes of absolute gradient sensing, relative gradient sensing, and a rotational diffusion dominated regime. We explore dependance of the swimming speed, average run time and the clockwise (CW) bias on ligand variation and derive a small set of relations that define a coarse grained model for bacterial chemotaxis. Simulations based on this coarse grained model compare well with microfluidic experiments on E. coli diffusion in linear and exponential gradients of aspartate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barkai N, Leibler S (1997) Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature 387:913–917
Kollmann M, Løvdok L, Bartholomé K, Timmer J, Sourjik V (2005) Design principles of a bacterial signalling network. Nature 438:504–507
Sourjik V, Berg HC (2002) Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis. PNAS 99(1):123–127
Cluzel P, Surette M, Leibler S (2000) An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells. Science 287:1652–1655
Bray D (1998) Receptor clustering as a mechanism to control sensitivity. Nature 393:85–88
Alon U, Surette MG, Barkai N, Leibler S (1999) Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 397:168–171
Hansen CH, Endres RG, Wingreen NS (2008) Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli: a molecular model for robust precise adaptation. PLOS Comp Biol 4(1):14–27
Kalinin YV, Jiang LL, Tu Y, Wu M (2009) Logarithmic sensing in Escherichia coli bacterial chemotaxis. Biophys J 96:2439
Matthäus F, Jagodić M, Dobnikar J (2009) E. coli superdiffusion and chemotaxis – search strategy, precision and motility. J Biophys 97(4):946–957
Strong SP, Freedman B, Bialek W, Koberle R (1998) Adaptation and optimal chemotactic strategy for E. coli. Phys Rev E 57(4):4604–4616
Emonet T, Macal CM, North MJ, Wickersham CE, Cluzel P (2005) Agent Cell: a digital single-cell assay for bacterial chemotaxis. Bioinformatics, 21(11):2714–2721
Bray D, Levin MD, Lipkow K (2007) The chemotactic behavior of computer-based surrogate bacteria. Curr Biol 17(4):R132–R134
Turner L, Ryu WS, Berg HC (2000) Real-time imaging of fluorescent flagellar filaments. J Bacteriol 182(10):2793–2801
Korobkova E, Emonet T, Park H, Cluzel P (2006) Hidden stochastic nature of a single bacterial motor. Phys Rev Lett 96(5):058105
Staropoli JF, Alon U (2000) Computerized analysis of chemotaxis at different stages of bacterial growth. Biophys J 78:513–519
Berg HC (2003) E. coli in motion. Biol Med Phys Biomed Eng. Springer, New York
Berg HC, Brown DA (1972) Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature 239(5374):500–504
Berg HC, Brown DA (1974) Temporal stimulation of chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Soc USA 71(4):1388
Tu Y, Shimizu TS, Berg HC (2008) Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to time-varying stimuli. PNAS, 105(39):14855–14860
Shimizu TS, Tu Y, Berg HC (2010) A modular gradient-sensing network for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli revealed by responses to time-varying stimuli. Mol Sys Biol 6:Art. no. 382
Jiang L, Ouyang Q, Tu Y (2010) Quantitative modeling of Escherichia coli chemotactic motion in environments varying in space and time. PLOS Comp Biol 6(4):e1000735
Vladimirov N, Løvdok L, Lebiedz D, Sourjik V (2008) Dependence of bacterial chemotaxis on gradient shape and adaptation rate. PLOS Comp Biol 4(12):e1000242
Block SM, Segall JE, Berg HC (1982) Impulse responses in bacterial chemotaxis. Cell 31:215
Kafri Y, daSilveira RA (2008) Steady-state chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. Phys Rev Lett 100:Art. no. 238101
de Gennes PG (2004) Chemotaxis; the role of internal delays. Eur Biophys J 33:691–693
Ahmed T, Shimizu TS, Stocker R (2010) Bacterial chemotaxis in linear and nonlinear steady microfluidic gradients. Nano Lett 10:3379
Berg HC, Turner L (1990) Chemotaxis of bacteria in glass capillary arrays. Biophys J hbox58:919–930
Cates ME, Marenduzzo D, Pagonabarraga I, Tailleur J (2010) Arrested phase separation in reproducing bacteria creates a generic route to pattern formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:11715–11720
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the support of the following funding agencies: the Center for Modeling and Simulation in the Biosciences (BIOMS) of the University of Heidelberg (FM), the German Ministry of Education and Research (grant Nr. 03BOPAL1) (MSM), the Slovenian Research Agency (P1-0055), the European Research Council (COLSTRUCTIION 227758), and the 7th Framework Programme (ITN-COMPLOIDS 234810) (JD, JBK & TC). JD wants to acknowledge the hospitality of the Aspen Center for Physics during the summer workshop programme in August 2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this paper
Cite this paper
Curk, T., Matthäus, F., Brill-Karniely, Y., Dobnikar, J. (2012). Coarse Graining Escherichia coli Chemotaxis: From Multi-flagella Propulsion to Logarithmic Sensing. In: Goryanin, I.I., Goryachev, A.B. (eds) Advances in Systems Biology. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 736. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7210-1_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7210-1_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7209-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7210-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)