Skip to main content

Field-Based Research on Production Control

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Planning Production and Inventories in the Extended Enterprise

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 151))

  • 3593 Accesses

Abstract

Field-based research is a form of empirical research and involves actual experiments or observations. The experiments and observations are often used to support or test scientific claims. They are also often used to generate insights about a phenomenon or possible research topics for further analysis (e.g., find a suitable topic for a graduate student). Although we perform field-based research for a number of reasons, we hope that the results we obtain are sound, scientifically valid, and provide value to both the field and science. Through field research, we endeavor to understand and model the business process, or capture the important and salient characteristics of the problem so that we can include them in modeling and analysis. We might hope to incorporate findings from field research in automated tools and advanced algorithms, making them more realistic and useful. In the best situation we can hope for scientific results that can predict or guide processes to the best possible outcome. This might be the lowest inventory levels possible, highest quality, least scrap, the most nimble and responsive reaction to a change in demand, or the quickest completion of an order. Strong, rigorous science is often associated with characteristics such as awareness and minimization of bias, inclusion of the necessary and sufficient aspects of the problem, ability to be replicated, evidence-based reasoning, careful and supported lines of causality, consistency in the use of terms and definitions, and the ability to be generalized in different ways. The science can take different forms: descriptive, prescriptive, predictive, or normative. Each type of science has assumptions and limitations. Each type also has recognized methods and tests of scientific quality. This chapter discusses various types of field research and presents ideas and methods for the sound undertaking of each type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Argyris C, Putnam R, McLain Smith D (1985) Action science. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne MN, Keeley SM (2004) Asking the right questions. A guide to critical thinking, 7th edn. Pearson, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer CF, Johnson EJ (1991) The process-performance paradox in expert judgment – how can experts know so much and predict so badly. In: Ericsson KA, Smith J (eds) Toward a general theory of expertise – prospects and limits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 195–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi MTH, Glaser R, Farr MJ (eds) (1988) The nature of expertise. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Colley AM, Beech JR (eds) (1989) Acquisition and performance of cognitive skills. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford S (2000) A field study of schedulers in industry: understanding their work, practices and performance. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford S, Wiers VCS (2001) From anecdotes to theory: reviewing the knowledge of the human factors in planning and scheduling. In: MacCarthy BL, Wilson JR (eds) Human performance in planning and scheduling. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 15–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney C (2004) Investigating culture, an experiential introduction to anthropology. Blackwell, Malden, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith M, Thorpe R, Lowe A (1991) Management research – an introduction. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA, Smith J (1991) Toward a general theory of expertise – prospects and limits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR (2006) The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galotti KM (2004) Cognitive psychology in and out of the laboratory, 3rd edn. Thomson, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Grills S (ed) (1998) Doing ethnographic research – fieldwork settings. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson E (1988) Qualitative methods in management research. Chartwell-Bratt, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen DL (1989) Participant observation: a methodology for human studies. Sage Publications, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kempf K, Uzsoy R, Smith S, Gary K (2000) Evaluation and comparison of production schedules. Comput Ind 42:203–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavrakas PJ (1993) Telephone survey methods, sampling, selection, and supervision, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKay KN (1987) Conceptual framework for job shop scheduling. MASc Dissertation, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay KN (1992) Production planning and scheduling: a model for manufacturing decisions requiring judgement. PhD thesis, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay T (2000) Reasons, explanations, and decisions – guidelines for critical thinking. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay KN, Buzacott JA (2000) The application of computerized production control systems in job shop environments. Comput Ind 42:79–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay KN, Buzacott JA, Charness N, Safayeni FR (1992) The scheduler’s predictive expertise: an interdisciplinary perspective. In: Doukidis GI, Paul RJ (eds) Artificial intelligence in operational research. Macmillan Press, London, pp 139–150

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKay KN, Safayeni F, Buzacott JA (1995) Schedulers & planners: what and how can we learn from them. In: Brown DE, Scherer WT (eds) Intelligent scheduling systems. Kluwer Publishers, Boston, pp 41–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKay KN, Wiers VCS (2004) Practical production control: a survival guide for planners and schedulers. J.R. Ross & APICS Co-publishers, Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachmias D, Nachmias C (1987) Research methods in the social sciences, 3rd edn. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson JR, Biolsi KJ (1991) Techniques for representing expert knowledge. In: Ericsson KA, Smith J (eds) Toward a general theory of expertise – prospects and limits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson PM (1989) The human planning and scheduling role in advanced manufacturing systems: an emerging human factors domain. Hum Factors 31(6):635–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schensul SL, Schensul JJ, LeCompte MD (1999) Essential ethnographic methods. Altamira Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley JP (1979) The ethnographic interview. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart CJ and Cash WB (2003) Interviewing principles and practices, 10th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss JF, Post TA (1988) On the solving of ill-structured problems. In: Chi MTH, Glaser R, Farr MJ (eds)The nature of expertise. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 261–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (1989) Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth N. McKay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McKay, K.N. (2011). Field-Based Research on Production Control. In: Kempf, K., Keskinocak, P., Uzsoy, R. (eds) Planning Production and Inventories in the Extended Enterprise. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 151. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6485-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics