Definition
- 1.
(n.) An affordance is an action possibility formed by the relationship between an agent and its environment (Gibson 1977, 1979). For any combination of agent or environment, any given affordance either exists or does not exist. There is no middle ground. The most inclusive definition of affordances considers only the physical possibility of an action occurring. An agent does not need to be aware of the afforded action, such as the affordance of opening a secret door. This definition is rooted in perceptual psychology and its primary source is The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception by Gibson (1979).
- 2.
(n.) An affordance may refer to a perceived affordance. Perceived affordances are a subset of affordances. A perceived affordanceuses a more restrictive definition that requires an agent to be aware of the affordance, either through direct perception or experience. A...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15, 181–195.
Chemero, A., & Turvey, M. (2007). Gibsonian affordances for roboticists. Adaptive Behavior, 15, 473–480.
Gaver, W. (1991). Technology affordances (pp. 79–84). New York: ACM Press.
Gibson, E. J., & Pick, A. D. (2000). An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Holland, J. (1996). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Klein, E. D., & Zentall, T. R. (2003). Initation and affordance learning by pigeons (Columba livia). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117, 414–419.
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. London: Lund Humphires.
McGrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000, Montreal, pp. 179–186.
Michaels, C. F. (2003). Affordances: Four points of debate. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 135–148.
Norman, D. A. (1988). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.
Rock, I. (1997). Indirect perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sanders, J. T. (1997). N ontology of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 9(1), 97–112.
Silverman, B. G., Johns, M., Cornwell, J. B., & O’Brien, K. (2006). Human behavior models for agents in simulators and games: Part I: Enabling science with PMFServ. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 15(2), 139–162.
Steedman, M. (2002). Formalizing affordance. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 834–839.
Stoffregen, T. A. (2003). Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 115–134.
Von Uexküll, J. (1920). Kompositionslehre der Natur: Biologie als undogmatsche Naturwissenschaft. Ausgewählte Schriften. In T. Von Uexküll (Ed.), Frankfurt am Mail. Berlin: Propyläen-Verlag (reprinted 1980).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this entry
Cite this entry
Nye, B.D., Silverman, B.G. (2012). Affordance. In: Seel, N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_369
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_369
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1427-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1428-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law