Skip to main content

Teachers’ Use of Assessment Data

  • Chapter

The emphasis has to be on development, and teachers need to be clear about the difference between deficit and developmental learning approaches. Clinical and deficit approaches sometimes focus on the things that people cannot do and hence develop a ‘fix-it’ approach. ‘It is a myth that intervention is only needed for the struggling student’ (Tayler, 2007, p. 4). Developmental models not only build on and scaffold existing knowledge bases of every student, but they also have to be clinical in that they focus on readiness to learn and follow a generic thesis of developing the student. They ought not entertain a deficit thesis of focusing on and emphasising ‘cures’ for learning deficits. In order to become a specialist in developmental learning, teachers need to have expertise in developmental assessment because it is integral to the formulation of personalised learning plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ACER (Australian Council for Educational Research). (1994). Developmental assessment resource for teachers. Melbourne: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. J., & Khoo, S. T. (1995). Quest: Interactive test analysis. Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes, & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Derry, S., Berliner, D., & Hammermass, K. (2005). Theories of learning and their role in teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond, & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 40–87). San Francisco: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Russo, M. J. (1999). Social experimentation. California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S., & Reise, S. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action. California: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1963). Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: Some questions. American Psychologist, 18(5), 19–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1981). The future of testing: A research agenda for cognitive psychology and psychometrics. American Psychologist, 36, 923–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1990). Expertise. In M. W. Evnsenk, A. N. Ellis, E. Hunt, & P. Johnson-Laird (Eds.), The Blackwell dictionary of cognitive psychology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaney, V. S. R., Khandker, S. R., & Alam, M. (1990). Bangladesh: Assessing basic learning skills. Bangladesk Development Series. Dhaka: University Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. (1997). Assessment in schools and workplace. Inaugural professorial lecture, University of Melbourne, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. (1998). Vietnamese national study of student achievement in mathematics and Vietnamese. Hanoi: National Institute for Education and Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. (2007). The comfort of competence and the uncertainty of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(1), 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P., & Forwood, A. (1990). The adult literacy and numeracy scales. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P., & Nix, P. (1990). Assessment and reporting: A new approach. Sydney: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halverson, R., Grigg, J., Prichett, R., & Thomas, C. (2005). The new instructional leadership: Creating data-driven instructional systems in schools (WCER Working Paper No. 2005–9). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Retrieved November 3, 2005, from <www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/Working_Paper_No_2005_9.pdf.

  • Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond, & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as a learning profession (pp. 127–150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development. In B. Joyce (Ed.), Designing training and peer coaching: Our needs for learning. VA, USA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 567–606). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G., & Gomez, M. L. (2001). Just showing up: Supporting early literacy through teachers’ professional communities. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(9), 675–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossensen, J., Hill, P., & Masters, G. (1993). Test of reading comprehension. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murimba, S., Nzomo, J., Keithele, M., Leste, A., Ross, K., & Saito, M., et al. (2002). Monitoring the quality of education for all: Some examples of different approaches used by The Southern Africa Consortium for monitoring educational quality. 20. Paris, France: IIEP, UNESCO (International Institute for Educational Planning).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N. 2005. Understanding, thinking, and education. Workshop held at Bialek College, Melbourne, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, G., McNaughton, S., & MacDonald, S. (2004). Managing the mismatch: Enhancing early literacy progress for children with diverse language and cultural identities in mainstream urban schools in New Zealand. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pool, B., Parkin, C., & Parkin, C. (2002). PROBE (2nd ed.). New Zealand: Triune Initiatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Paedaogiske Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher, 19(7), 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V., & Lai, M. K. (2006). Practitioner research for educators: A guide to improving classrooms and schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, K. J., & Hill, P. W. (1996). Assessing, recording and reporting students’ educational progress: The case for ‘Subject Profiles. Assessment in Education, 3(3), 309–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayler, C. (2007). Challenges for early learning and schooling. Education, Science & the Future of Australia: A public seminar series on policy. University of Melbourne, Woodward Centre, 23 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1959). The measurement of values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H. S., & Robinson, V. J. M. (2001). Achieving school improvement through challenging and changing teachers’ schema. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VCAA (Victoria Curriculum and Assessment Authority). (2003–2005). The Achievement Improvement Monitor. Melbourne: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B., & Masters, G. (1983). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Griffin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Griffin, P. (2009). Teachers’ Use of Assessment Data. In: Wyatt-Smith, C., Cumming, J.J. (eds) Educational Assessment in the 21st Century. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9964-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics